OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Honolulu Government Efficiency Committee Meeting - May 1, 2026

City CouncilFriday, May 1, 2026
BodyHonolulu, Hawaii
SessionCity Council
DateFriday, May 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 34:23
Transcript — Verbatim
2:32

All right, aloha and good afternoon, everyone.

2:34

It's Thursday, April 30th, 2026, and the time is two thirty-eight p.m.

2:38

Will the Committee on Government Efficiency and Customer Services please come to order.

2:42

I'd like to welcome committee members Cordero and Nishimoto, as well as Councilmember Okimoto.

2:47

Committee Vice Chair Wire is excused today.

2:50

Pursuant to section ninety-two-three point seven of the Hawaii revised statutes, this meeting will be conducted as a remote meeting by interactive conference technology with the following procedures in effect for the meeting.

2:59

Members of the public will be allowed to provide oral testimony on all items on the agenda in person in the council chamber and remotely via video conference or phone when each agenda item is taken up.

3:08

Before testifying, each person shall state their name for the record.

3:11

Each speaker may not have anyone else read their statement and will be limited to a one-minute presentation on each item.

3:16

As both English and Hawaiian are official languages of state of Hawaii pursuant to Article 15, section four of the Hawaii State Constitution and HRS section one-thirteen.

3:42

Persons who have not registered will be given an opportunity to testify following the registered testifiers.

5:00

If she'd like to say any words about this bill or the amendments.

5:05

Hi, so good afternoon, Chair Dos Santos Tamman members.

5:08

Kim Hashiro, Director for the Department of Customer Services.

5:12

As we submitted in our written testimony, we do support this bill, and we appreciate consideration regarding our comments and revised language.

5:33

Thank you, members.

5:34

Any questions for the director of customer services?

5:37

Okay.

5:38

Hearing none, um I'd like to call upon testifiers who we have online, Stephanie Kendrick from the Hawaiian Humane Society.

5:52

Please proceed.

5:55

Oh, there we go.

5:56

Sorry, it wasn't letting me unmute, Chair.

5:58

Um, uh Chair Dos Santos TAM, members of the committee, and uh council member Okimoto, Stephanie Kendrick with the Hawaiian Humane Society.

6:08

As director mentioned, we're in strong support of this measure and really uh value all of the conversations that we've had with council members about improving enforcement for animal nuisance issues.

6:20

Uh we did suggest amendments to the new proposed section seven, uh, which at this point seems to um assume that all of the provisions of this of the animal nuisance statute of chapter 12 article two are enforced by the county animal control contractor, and that's not the case.

6:41

Um different agencies have different roles to play in enforcement of these rules as we outline in our written testimony.

6:47

So I'd be happy to answer any questions the committee has.

6:51

Um, and I hope we'll see this bill move forward.

6:54

Thank you.

6:54

Okay, thank you, members.

6:55

Any questions for the Hawaiian Humane Society?

6:59

Okay, hearing none, thank you.

7:01

Clerks, is there anyone else standing by, either here in the chambers or remotely to testify?

7:05

Chair, there are none.

7:06

Okay, there being none.

7:08

Um members, we're in discussion.

7:09

Councilmember Okamoto's introducer of the measure.

7:12

Would you like to offer comments?

7:13

I appreciate you hearing this measure and taking the journey with us on this bill and its life.

7:18

Um, I I again thank you so much for hearing the bill.

7:20

I we my team and I work really closely.

7:22

One of Director Hashiro from the Department of Um Customer Services and as well as the Humane Society.

7:30

This the process of this was to come up with a to craft a good bill that would address the community concerns for public safety.

7:36

And the key change that we mentioned was to make this bill um to make it so that the civil penalties are easier to enforce.

7:44

I thank you again for hearing it.

7:45

I hope that we can pass it.

7:46

Um I I think that it's a happy, it's been a collaborative piece to make sure that we have all the voices heard and keep our community safe.

7:54

So Mahalo again.

7:55

No, thank you.

7:56

And I thank you for your um leadership in this issue.

7:58

I know that this is something that's an issue island wide, and uh I appreciate you taking it on.

8:03

Um members, any other discussion?

8:06

Okay, if not, um the chair recommends the Bill 8 of 2025 CD1 be amended to a CD two that incorporates the following amendments.

8:14

First, the one recommended by the Department of Customer Services in Departmental Communication 292 of 2026, as well as inserting the following language in section seven, chapter 12-2 enforcement A, to read quote, require the animal control contractor to enforce the provisions of this article as it pertains to the animals identified within the executed contract.

8:41

Um, this language is may also be amended as OCS seems appropriate.

8:46

Um and in section seven uh chapter 12-2 enforcement subpoint B to read animal control contractor or sorry to read animal control contractor to determine compliance with the provisions of this article as it pertains to the animals identified within the executed contract, similar to what was suggested for subpoint A.

9:09

Um, we also recommend other technical unsubstantive amendments.

9:16

Okay.

9:17

Any objections or reservations to the recommendation to amend.

9:21

There being none, the bill's been amended to CD2.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Technology and Innovation█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Procedural██████████████17%
Animal Welfare█████████████16%
Homelessness██████████12%
Summary of Proceedings

Honolulu Government Efficiency and Customer Services Committee Meeting - May 1, 2026

Note on Date Discrepancy: The transcript indicates the meeting occurred on Thursday, April 30, 2026, at 2:38 p.m., but the official metadata provided states the meeting took place on 2026-05-01 00:35:56+00:00. This summary uses the provided exact date.

The Committee on Government Efficiency and Customer Services, chaired by Chair Dos Santos Taman, convened remotely to discuss Bill 8 (2025) CD1 regarding animal nuisance civil penalties and to receive an informational briefing from the city’s Chief Data Officer on data initiatives. Councilmembers Cordero, Nishimoto, and Okimoto were present; Vice Chair Wire was excused. Public testimony was limited to one minute per speaker.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kim Hashiro (Director, Department of Customer Services) expressed support for Bill 8, noting appreciation for consideration of their comments and revised language.
  • Stephanie Kendrick (Hawaiian Humane Society) expressed strong support for the measure and highlighted concerns about Section 7, which appeared to assume all enforcement of the animal nuisance statute (Chapter 12, Article 2) falls under the county animal control contractor. She noted different agencies have distinct roles and suggested amendments, as detailed in written testimony.

Discussion Items

  • Bill 8 (2025) CD1 – Animal Nuisance Civil Penalties: Introduced by Councilmember Okimoto to improve enforcement of civil penalties for animal nuisance. The measure was collaboratively developed with the Department of Customer Services and the Humane Society. The chair recommended amendments to create a CD2 version:
    • Incorporate amendments from Departmental Communication 292 (2026) recommended by the Department of Customer Services.
    • Insert language in Section 7 (Chapter 12-2 enforcement): Subpoint A: “Require the animal control contractor to enforce the provisions of this article as it pertains to the animals identified within the executed contract.” Subpoint B: “Animal control contractor to determine compliance with the provisions of this article as it pertains to the animals identified within the executed contract.”
    • Additional technical, non-substantive amendments. No objections were raised; the bill was amended to CD2 and reported out for third reading.
  • Informational Briefing – Mayor’s Message 63 (2026) – Key Data Initiatives: Chief Data Officer Kira Chucham presented updates on the city’s data strategy since April 2025. Highlights included:
    • Delivery of the City Data Plan (published April 2025) with a biennial refinement cycle.
    • Data governance framework nearly complete; rollout of data governance and stewardship programs in progress.
    • Development of a citywide AI policy with a working group of 20+ individuals from multiple departments; expected to be issued as a mayor’s directive before the end of the fiscal year.
    • Team expansion: two new positions (data governance analyst and data scientist) approved by council; the data scientist position is vacant after the hire departed.
    • A data integration platform procured and operational, enabling cross-departmental data integration.
    • Open data portal administration transferred from DIT to her team; active enhancement and governance underway.
    • Data Community of Practice established (January 2025) with ~50 members meeting biweekly; training on data management, AI, and best practices.
    • Innovative applications deployed or in development:
      • KOCO Command Center (homeless bed availability for HPD, CORE, nonprofits) – active since June 2025.
      • MH3 Tracking (for individuals taken into custody as a danger to self or public) – tracks from street to mental health facility.
      • CORE (Crisis Outreach Response) engagement tracking application – in prototype.
      • City Property Data Inventory – expected to launch by end of May 2026, published on open data portal.
    • Councilmember Okimoto asked about office size (3 staff, 1 vacancy) and praised collaboration with DIT.
    • Chair Dos Santos Taman asked about progress on data standards (identified as “severely lacking” in the data plan). Chucham responded that standards will be set collaboratively through the data governance program, socialized at upcoming cabinet meeting and shared with council.
    • Chair asked about review of open data policies by end of FY26 (two months remaining). Chucham confirmed target date of July, with active administration transferred to her team.
    • Chair asked about department goals for posting data; Chucham noted some departments are ahead, and data community of practice is working to enable regular uploads.
    • Chair questioned prioritization of AI use across departments (e.g., DTS for traffic). Chucham stated engagement with HPD, Fire, DTS among others, but solutions listed are those already delivered.

Key Outcomes

  • Bill 8 (2025) CD1 was amended to CD2 with unanimous approval and reported out for third reading (no objections).
  • The informational briefing on data initiatives was received; no formal action was taken.
  • The committee adjourned at 3:10 p.m. (per transcript).

Meeting Transcript

All right, aloha and good afternoon, everyone. It's Thursday, April 30th, 2026, and the time is two thirty-eight p.m. Will the Committee on Government Efficiency and Customer Services please come to order. I'd like to welcome committee members Cordero and Nishimoto, as well as Councilmember Okimoto. Committee Vice Chair Wire is excused today. Pursuant to section ninety-two-three point seven of the Hawaii revised statutes, this meeting will be conducted as a remote meeting by interactive conference technology with the following procedures in effect for the meeting. Members of the public will be allowed to provide oral testimony on all items on the agenda in person in the council chamber and remotely via video conference or phone when each agenda item is taken up. Before testifying, each person shall state their name for the record. Each speaker may not have anyone else read their statement and will be limited to a one-minute presentation on each item. As both English and Hawaiian are official languages of state of Hawaii pursuant to Article 15, section four of the Hawaii State Constitution and HRS section one-thirteen. Persons who have not registered will be given an opportunity to testify following the registered testifiers. If she'd like to say any words about this bill or the amendments. Hi, so good afternoon, Chair Dos Santos Tamman members. Kim Hashiro, Director for the Department of Customer Services. As we submitted in our written testimony, we do support this bill, and we appreciate consideration regarding our comments and revised language. Thank you, members. Any questions for the director of customer services? Okay. Hearing none, um I'd like to call upon testifiers who we have online, Stephanie Kendrick from the Hawaiian Humane Society. Please proceed. Oh, there we go. Sorry, it wasn't letting me unmute, Chair. Um, uh Chair Dos Santos TAM, members of the committee, and uh council member Okimoto, Stephanie Kendrick with the Hawaiian Humane Society. As director mentioned, we're in strong support of this measure and really uh value all of the conversations that we've had with council members about improving enforcement for animal nuisance issues. Uh we did suggest amendments to the new proposed section seven, uh, which at this point seems to um assume that all of the provisions of this of the animal nuisance statute of chapter 12 article two are enforced by the county animal control contractor, and that's not the case. Um different agencies have different roles to play in enforcement of these rules as we outline in our written testimony. So I'd be happy to answer any questions the committee has. Um, and I hope we'll see this bill move forward. Thank you. Okay, thank you, members. Any questions for the Hawaiian Humane Society? Okay, hearing none, thank you. Clerks, is there anyone else standing by, either here in the chambers or remotely to testify? Chair, there are none. Okay, there being none. Um members, we're in discussion. Councilmember Okamoto's introducer of the measure. Would you like to offer comments? I appreciate you hearing this measure and taking the journey with us on this bill and its life. Um, I I again thank you so much for hearing the bill. I we my team and I work really closely. One of Director Hashiro from the Department of Um Customer Services and as well as the Humane Society. This the process of this was to come up with a to craft a good bill that would address the community concerns for public safety. And the key change that we mentioned was to make this bill um to make it so that the civil penalties are easier to enforce. I thank you again for hearing it. I hope that we can pass it. Um I I think that it's a happy, it's been a collaborative piece to make sure that we have all the voices heard and keep our community safe. So Mahalo again. No, thank you. And I thank you for your um leadership in this issue.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com