OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Honolulu, Hawaii/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Honolulu Food Security Charter Amendment Overview – 2026-10-21

City Council — Wednesday, October 21, 2026
BodyHonolulu, Hawaii
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:13

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Should the charter require annual funding for a food security fund without having to simultaneously increase real property tax rates to fund the appropriation to support programs and grants that provide locally grown or produced food to Oahu residents, as well as non-local food only in an emergency?

0:20

What does this charter amendment

Unassigned speaker

0:22

do?

Speaker 2

0:23

Charter Amendment number one is about food.

0:26

Each year the city sets aside a small slice of its property tax money for a few special causes.

0:32

Right now, that slice is two and a half cents of every dollar.

0:36

This measure would raise it to three cents and send half a cent of every dollar to a new fund that helps Oahu residents afford healthy food with a focus on food grown, raised, and caught in Hawaii.

0:51

Why is this on the ballot?

0:54

Many families struggle to afford healthy food, while local farmers and fishers don't always have an easy way to reach them.

1:01

Some local food goes to waste.

1:13

The money is always there when you need it, but it's money you can't spend on anything else?

1:19

Why do people support this?

1:22

Supporters like having a steady, dependable money for hunger relief and local farming.

1:28

Unspent money stays in the jar.

1:30

So it can build up for bigger projects like food storage or delivery.

1:35

Why do some people have concerns about this amendment?

1:39

This doesn't raise your property taxes by itself, but it locks up more of the city's existing money, leaving less room for other needs.

1:48

Also, food from outside Hawaii could be bought only during a declared emergency and only with about 10% of the fund?

1:58

Some worry that that's too tight in a real crisis.

2:01

What are the key takeaways?

2:03

The bottom line is should a permanent food commitment be written into the city's charter, or should leaders decide the amount each year in the budget.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Food Security█████████████████████████████████████████████70%
Real Property Taxation███████████████████30%
Summary of Proceedings

Honolulu Food Security Charter Amendment Overview (2026-10-21)

On 2026-10-21 at 22:06:30 UTC, the available transcript provided an informational overview of Charter Amendment No. 1, a ballot measure concerning a food security fund on Oahu. No agenda or minutes were available, and no actual board/council deliberation or public testimony was recorded.

Discussion Items

  • The transcript framed the ballot question as whether the city charter should require annual funding for a food security fund without having to simultaneously increase real property tax rates to support programs and grants that provide locally grown or produced food to Oahu residents, with non-local food allowed only in an emergency.
  • Charter Amendment No. 1 would increase the city's annual property tax set-aside for special causes from 2.5 cents per dollar to 3 cents per dollar, directing half a cent of every dollar to a new food security fund.
  • The fund would focus on helping Oahu residents afford healthy food, with an emphasis on food grown, raised, and caught in Hawaii. Non-local food could be purchased only during a declared emergency and with about 10% of the fund.
  • The narrator explained that the measure does not by itself raise property taxes, but it would lock up more of the city's existing money and leave less room for other budget needs.
  • Supporters were described as favoring a steady, dependable funding source for hunger relief and local farming, with unspent money staying in the fund and building up for larger projects such as food storage or delivery.
  • Concerns highlighted included the reduced flexibility for other city needs and the tight restriction on using non-local food during an emergency, with some worrying that the roughly 10% cap would be too limited in a real crisis.
  • The key takeaway was framed as a choice between writing a permanent food commitment into the city charter or letting elected leaders decide the amount each year through the budget process.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes, decisions, or official recommendations were recorded in the available transcript; it served as an informational summary of the amendment for voters.

Meeting Transcript

Should the charter require annual funding for a food security fund without having to simultaneously increase real property tax rates to fund the appropriation to support programs and grants that provide locally grown or produced food to Oahu residents, as well as non-local food only in an emergency? What does this charter amendment do? Charter Amendment number one is about food. Each year the city sets aside a small slice of its property tax money for a few special causes. Right now, that slice is two and a half cents of every dollar. This measure would raise it to three cents and send half a cent of every dollar to a new fund that helps Oahu residents afford healthy food with a focus on food grown, raised, and caught in Hawaii. Why is this on the ballot? Many families struggle to afford healthy food, while local farmers and fishers don't always have an easy way to reach them. Some local food goes to waste. The money is always there when you need it, but it's money you can't spend on anything else? Why do people support this? Supporters like having a steady, dependable money for hunger relief and local farming. Unspent money stays in the jar. So it can build up for bigger projects like food storage or delivery. Why do some people have concerns about this amendment? This doesn't raise your property taxes by itself, but it locks up more of the city's existing money, leaving less room for other needs. Also, food from outside Hawaii could be bought only during a declared emergency and only with about 10% of the fund? Some worry that that's too tight in a real crisis. What are the key takeaways? The bottom line is should a permanent food commitment be written into the city's charter, or should leaders decide the amount each year in the budget.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com