Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The City and County of Honolulu held a meeting on October 26, 2026, to receive a presentation and discuss Charter Amendment No. 2, a ballot measure proposing to rewrite the preamble of the city charter. The proposed new language seeks to recognize the relationship between the people and the ʻāina (land), honor kupuna (elders) and Prince Jonah Kūhiō Kalanianaʻole, and affirm commitments to transparent, accountable government and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources.
Should the charter be amended to replace its preamble with language recognizing the relationship between the people of the city and county of Honolulu and the Aina, honoring the wisdom of Kupuna and the legacy of Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalani Anaole, and affirming commitments to transparent, accountable government, and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources. What does this charter amendment do? Charter Amendment No. 2 would rewrite the opening statement in the city charter, which is basically the city's constitution. The new words recognize the bond between people and the Aina. They honor our Kupuna and Prince Kuhil Kalani Anaole, and they commit the city to open, honest government that includes the public and cares for our natural and cultural resources. Why do people support this? Supporters see it as a meaningful recognition of native Hawaiian history and values and of our shared responsibility to the land, water, and community. They also welcome a clear promise of transparency and public involvement. Why do some people have concerns about this amendment? The main limit is an opening statement usually doesn't create new money, new duties for city departments, or new rights you can take to court. Passing it alone wouldn't change how land decisions are made or how open government rules work. What are the key takeaways? This one is mostly about symbolism and direction. Do these values belong at the front of the city's charter?