OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Honolulu, Hawaii/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City Council Briefing on Charter Amendment No. 2 - October 26, 2026

City Council — Monday, October 26, 2026
BodyHonolulu, Hawaii
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 26, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:36

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Should the charter be amended to replace its preamble with language recognizing the relationship between the people of the city and county of Honolulu and the Aina, honoring the wisdom of Kupuna and the legacy of Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalani Anaole, and affirming commitments to transparent, accountable government, and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources.

0:24

What

Speaker 2

0:24

does this charter amendment do?

0:26

Charter Amendment No.

0:28

2 would rewrite the opening statement in the city charter, which is basically the city's constitution.

0:34

The new words recognize the bond between people and the Aina.

0:38

They honor our Kupuna and Prince Kuhil Kalani Anaole, and they commit the city to open, honest government that includes the public and cares for our natural and cultural resources.

0:51

Why do people support this?

0:53

Supporters see it as a meaningful recognition of native Hawaiian history and values and of our shared responsibility to the land, water, and community.

1:03

They also welcome a clear promise of transparency and public involvement.

1:08

Why do some people have concerns about this amendment?

1:11

The main limit is an opening statement usually doesn't create new money, new duties for city departments, or new rights you can take to court.

1:20

Passing it alone wouldn't change how land decisions are made or how open government rules work.

1:26

What are the key

Speaker 1

1:27

takeaways?

Speaker 2

1:30

This one is mostly about symbolism and direction.

1:33

Do these values belong at the front of the city's charter?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Government Transparency█████████████████████████████████████████████60%
Cultural Heritage██████████████████████████████40%
Summary of Proceedings

City Council Briefing on Charter Amendment No. 2 - October 26, 2026

The City and County of Honolulu held a meeting on October 26, 2026, to receive a presentation and discuss Charter Amendment No. 2, a ballot measure proposing to rewrite the preamble of the city charter. The proposed new language seeks to recognize the relationship between the people and the ʻāina (land), honor kupuna (elders) and Prince Jonah Kūhiō Kalanianaʻole, and affirm commitments to transparent, accountable government and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources.

Discussion Items

  • Presentation on Charter Amendment No. 2: The body received a detailed briefing on the proposed amendment. The presentation explained that the measure would replace the existing opening statement of the city's constitution with new language emphasizing Native Hawaiian values, cultural heritage, and governmental accountability.
  • Supporters' Position: The presentation noted that supporters view the amendment as a meaningful recognition of Native Hawaiian history and a clear promise of transparency and public involvement. They see it as a statement of shared responsibility to the land, water, and community.
  • Concerns Raised: The discussion also highlighted limitations of the amendment, which were presented as typical constraints of a preamble. It was noted that the amendment would not create new funding, impose new duties on city departments, or establish new legal rights enforceable in court. Consequently, passing the amendment alone would not alter land-use decision-making processes or change open government rules.
  • Framing of the Amendment: The presentation characterized the measure as primarily symbolic and directional, posing the fundamental question for the body's consideration: whether these values belong at the forefront of the city's charter.

Key Outcomes

  • The meeting concluded with the comprehensive information having been presented and discussed.
  • No formal votes, motions, or referrals were made. The discussion served as a deliberative and informational session regarding the scope and implications of the charter amendment.

Meeting Transcript

Should the charter be amended to replace its preamble with language recognizing the relationship between the people of the city and county of Honolulu and the Aina, honoring the wisdom of Kupuna and the legacy of Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalani Anaole, and affirming commitments to transparent, accountable government, and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources. What does this charter amendment do? Charter Amendment No. 2 would rewrite the opening statement in the city charter, which is basically the city's constitution. The new words recognize the bond between people and the Aina. They honor our Kupuna and Prince Kuhil Kalani Anaole, and they commit the city to open, honest government that includes the public and cares for our natural and cultural resources. Why do people support this? Supporters see it as a meaningful recognition of native Hawaiian history and values and of our shared responsibility to the land, water, and community. They also welcome a clear promise of transparency and public involvement. Why do some people have concerns about this amendment? The main limit is an opening statement usually doesn't create new money, new duties for city departments, or new rights you can take to court. Passing it alone wouldn't change how land decisions are made or how open government rules work. What are the key takeaways? This one is mostly about symbolism and direction. Do these values belong at the front of the city's charter?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com