OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hudson, Ohio/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hudson City Council Workshop - April 14, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, April 14, 2026
BodyHudson, Ohio
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, April 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:02:41

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:06

It's 1930.

0:07

I'd like to call this meeting to order.

0:09

Uh, Mayor Anze Vino is out tonight, so um I'm filling in for him.

0:14

This is a duly noticed workshop of Hudson City Council head in accordance with the sunshine laws of the state of Ohio, Section 121.22 and the City of Hudson Charter.

0:27

Article 3, Section 3.02 for Tuesday, April 14th, 2026.

0:36

I'd like to take a moment to welcome everyone here who is in attendance tonight, as well as those who may be watching remotely via the HCTV feed, and we thank the HC TV team for being here tonight.

0:51

So moving on to the next section.

0:54

Um correspondence and council comments.

0:58

Anybody have any comments or um concerns they want to share that hasn't already been shared.

1:06

Patricia.

1:09

Last Wednesday at the architectural review board, um they did approve the addition to the dental office on East Main Street here.

1:19

There'd been some controversy about that.

1:22

Um but the uh they approved it.

1:25

The architecture that was put together was very nice, and they're using not a garage door in the back, but um French doors.

1:34

Um, and most of the neighbors around the area seemed pleased with what they were going to do.

1:40

Um, but I thought that especially those in Ward 1 should know that um that is taking place.

1:50

Uh Planning Commission met yesterday.

1:52

Uh, and just a couple things I know I mentioned to you, but just want to let everyone know.

1:56

Um, so they would like an update on the issue with retirement facilities and EMS that was brought up a while back.

2:02

Um so I also let the chair know that if they ever want a specific update from council, um, that they can uh talk with city staff and have it added to their schedule, and then um I can, you know, I or the appropriate person can give them an update as long as I know kind of what the update is and who to get the update from.

2:18

Um they also discussed um district 11 uh last night and uh specifically related to the comprehensive plan and district 11.

2:27

Um I don't want to like steal anyone's thunder here.

2:30

I know we have you all here tonight.

2:31

Um great discussion last night of how the comprehensive plan um links to uh potential rezoning of district eleven and kind of where it matches up and where it might not match up, which I know we're gonna discuss tonight.

2:43

Um that was Planning Commission.

2:48

Yes, uh, I did receive an email from a resident who requested it be read into the record.

2:53

So I'd like to take this opportunity to do so, and it is in regards to District 11.

2:57

So keep rolling with that.

3:01

Um by my count, page nine, titled Complimenting Downtown, the paragraph titled Square Footage Limitations highlight retail size restrictions of up to 1,000 square feet as a use by right and use and up to 220,000 square feet as a conditional use.

3:20

Then goes on to state generally the creation of a new shopping district requires a large anchor tenant, typically a national brand or big box retailer, to make it viable.

3:30

For comparison, at Pinecrest, the anchors REI and Whole Foods are 27,000 and 45,000 square feet respectively.

3:39

It then asserts the proposed size limitations on retail uses within D11 help safeguard that retail uses will not become the primary drivers of foot traffic and activity within the district.

3:51

Only two pages later, under the title Grocery Illustrations, the presentation offers an illustrative view of the IRG property showing a 40,000 square foot grocery Whole Foods stores ranged between 25 and 55, sorry, 25 and 50,000 square feet according to Google AI.

4:09

Next to a 20,000 square foot retail conditional use, slightly smaller than the typical REI, but according to Google, well within the typical size range of a GAP Banana Republic, Lululemon, William Sonoma, etc.

4:23

Does anyone really believe there would be a significant difference between a 45,000 square foot Whole Foods next to a 27 square foot, 27,000 square foot REI at Pinecrest and a potential 40,000 square foot Whole Foods next to a 20,000 square foot national chain retailer in D11?

4:42

Council needs to put some adult supervision on this D11 proposal, bring it back in alignment with the comprehensive plan, which the charter defines as the operative growth management policy for the municipality, and conduct a review to understand how city staff and two of your current colleagues who, along with the former council president, were on the D11 subcommittee, brought forward a proposal so disconnected from the municipality's operative growth management policy.

5:00

And conduct a review to understand how city staff and two of your current colleagues who, along with the former council president, were on the D 11 subcommittee, brought forward a proposal so disconnected from the municipality's operative growth management policy.

5:09

And with such blatant flaws in their supporting logic.

5:11

Hudson leadership needs to learn from this and develop improved controls and processes to prevent Silomiller government governance and logic failures in the future.

5:21

Thank you, Tom Mayor.

5:24

That was all.

5:26

That is all.

5:28

Anybody else?

5:30

So I just have a couple things to make people aware of.

5:34

So early voting for the library board has begun.

5:38

So this is a change from previous years where it happened on a one day on a Sunday at the end of April or May.

5:47

This is now several weeks of voting.

5:50

You don't have to attend the annual meeting if you cannot attend.

5:54

So go to the library and vote for the library board.

5:59

Also, we're early voting for the May election has started down in Summit County Board of Elections, so check their website if you want to go down for early voting at uh at the summit county board of elections.

6:11

Um I always forget my read a tax reform, and if you're new to Hudson, especially you might not be used to filing local income taxes.

6:20

Uh we have that here where you have to do a whole separate um yeah local income tax form.

6:28

And so make sure that you do that.

6:30

And then if I could ask the um city staff to send out some information contact numbers for kinetic.

6:41

Um they are tearing up um a lot of ward one, we're award four right now.

6:50

And uh I just I anticipate a number of kind of complaints or concerns when it's not put back the way uh it was when they were tearing it up before they took started tearing it up.

7:02

So um hopefully they'll do a great job, but it's just it's it's hard to get all that dirt back together looking looking nice.

7:09

So I think if we have um somebody that uh a number that they can reach uh that the public can reach, that'll be very helpful.

7:17

Okay.

7:19

Next is discussion items, and we have the uh district 11 discussion.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation███████████████████████23%
Planned Development████████████████16%
Public Safety█████████████13%
Affordable Housing███████7%
Public Works███████7%
Economic Development██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Senior Facility EMS█████5%
Nonprofit Funding Policy████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Hudson City Council Workshop - April 14, 2026

The Hudson City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, from 7:30 PM to 10:32 PM at Town Hall. The meeting focused on a detailed review of the District 11 zoning proposal relative to the Comprehensive Plan, an operational overview of the Fire and EMS departments, and a proposed policy for accepting donations from nonprofit organizations. Several legislative items were discussed and forwarded to the April 21, 2026, regular council meeting.

Correspondence and Council Comments

  • Councilmember Brezovec read an email from resident Tom Mayor into the record. Mayor argued that the D11 proposal is "disconnected from the municipality's operative growth management policy" (the Comprehensive Plan) and called for "adult supervision" and improved governance processes.
  • Councilmember Goetz reported that the Architectural and Historic Board of Review approved an addition to a dental office on East Main Street on April 7, 2026.
  • Councilmember Weinstein noted that the Planning Commission discussed District 11 and the Comprehensive Plan at its April 13, 2026, meeting.
  • Council President Bird reminded residents of early voting for the Library Board and the May primary election, and asked staff to share Kinetic’s contact information for Ward 4 residents.

Discussion Items

A. District 11 Zoning Discussion (Item 26-0023)

  • Members of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (Rebecca Leiter, Jesse Obert, Fink Henry, Todd Zedak, Bob Kahrl) presented an overview of the plan’s development, including its timeline (November 2022 – May 2024), community engagement methods (two surveys with 1,266 total responses, focus groups, pop-up events), and the values identified by residents: downtown, schools, safety, and traffic as the top concern.
  • The Committee presented the Comprehensive Plan’s future land use map for the SR 91 corridor (Stony Hill to Norton Road), which designates the area around the former Joann Fabrics property as light industrial/flex with potential for limited retail frontage, and emphasized that residential use was never intended for that area. They stated that the D11 proposal’s inclusion of mixed-use and up to 200 residential units conflicts with the plan.
  • Planning Commission Vice Chair Obert noted that Planning Commission had requested additional time to work on foundational land development code issues (e.g., planned development definitions) before finalizing District 11, and that the 120-day review period was insufficient. He expressed concern that the current code lacks clear guidelines for planned developments, leaving the city open to legal risk.
  • Economic Development Manager Behnke provided context on efforts to re-lease the vacant Joann’s building, noting that 70% of commercial leads seek existing facilities, and that the site is being actively marketed by IRG with CBRE. She highlighted challenges such as poor cell service in the area.
  • Council members debated whether D11 could be aligned with the Comprehensive Plan by removing residential uses, or whether the plan development code must be revised first. No official action was taken.

B. Fire and EMS Department Overviews (Item 26-0024)

  • Chief Jerry Varnes presented a comprehensive update on the Fire and EMS departments’ 2026 operational status, including response times, personnel, certifications, and call volumes.
  • EMS Statistics: Average turnout time (NFPA goal: 60 seconds) was 64 seconds in 2025; nighttime turnout averaged 93 seconds. Total EMS calls for service were 2,615 in 2025 and on pace for 3,000 in 2026. EMS experienced 31 resignations/retirements and 25 hires over three years; Chief Varnes characterized the department as a training facility. 46% of all EMS transports in 2025 originated from senior care facilities.
  • Fire Statistics: Fire department turnout time averaged 1 minute 58 seconds (NFPA standard: 1 minute 20 seconds), partly due to construction delays. Staffed response (when on-station) was significantly faster than non-staffed. Firefighters averaged 99 hours of training per person in 2025, far exceeding the state requirement of 12 hours/year. The department is hiring 12 new part-time firefighters (to be sworn in by end of April) to staff nighttime shifts once station renovations are complete (projected August–September 2026).
  • Chief Varnes clarified that fire and EMS currently operate as separate departments under the hybrid model, with fire staff not required to be cross-trained as EMTs/paramedics, though cross-training is encouraged and offered. Discussion ensued about the long-term model and the potential for a merged department in the future.
  • Council discussed the fiscal impact of senior care facility calls, with Finance Director noting approximately $800,000 in annual EMS revenue. Councilmember Bird suggested exploring a bed tax or other compensation mechanisms for future senior facilities.

C. Nonprofit Donations Policy (Resolution 26-73, originally TMP-8567)

  • City Manager Sheridan presented a draft policy to create a transparent, legally compliant process for accepting financial or in-kind contributions from nonprofit organizations for city-sponsored public projects. The policy requires nonprofits to be 501(c)(3) organizations (with potential for 501(c)(4)), mandates that the city retain full control over project execution and fund allocation, and requires a signed agreement detailing the project scope and payment schedule.
  • Councilmember Weinstein requested clarification that donations channeled through a community foundation (like the Hudson Community Foundation) would be eligible even if the donor group is not itself a 501(c)(3). Sheridan agreed to adjust the language. The item was scheduled for first reading on April 21, 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • District 11: No vote was taken; the discussion served as informational input for future council deliberations on the zoning proposal.
  • Fire/EMS Overview: No formal action; council will continue to monitor response times and consider policies related to senior care facilities and EMS staffing.
  • Nonprofit Donations Policy: Scheduled for first reading as Resolution 26-73 (agenda number TMP-8567) on April 21, 2026. Staff will incorporate requested clarifications.
  • Consent Agenda Items Forwarded to April 21, 2026, Council Meeting:
    • Motion to acknowledge March 2026 Financial Report (TMP-8592)
    • Ordinance adopting Federal Funds and Grant Policies (26-65, TMP-8566)
    • Ordinance amending 2026 appropriations (26-66, TMP-8595)
    • Resolution affirming State Capital Budget application (26-67, TMP-8565)
    • Resolution affirming ODPS Priority One and Supplemental Grant application (26-68, TMP-8579)
    • Resolution authorizing three-year contract with Vetro, Inc. for fiber mapping software (26-69, TMP-8581)
  • Proposed Legislation for First/Second/Third Readings on April 21, 2026:
    • Ordinance amending street banner regulations (26-51, third reading)
    • Resolution authorizing contract with RDL Architects for Downtown Development Concept Site Plan (26-53, third reading)
    • Ordinance allowing correction of scrivener’s errors by the Clerk (26-64, second reading)
    • Ordinance repealing campaign finance limits (26-70, first reading) — debated; council will seek additional information on constitutionality and alternative caps.
    • Ordinance amending rules for introduction of legislation (26-71, first reading) — staff will discuss concerns about city manager’s authority and agenda addition process.
    • Ordinance creating a public records policy to protect minor and crime victim identities (26-72, first reading)
    • Resolution on nonprofit donation policy (26-73, first reading)
  • Future Proclamations (April 21, 2026): Lemonade Day Month, Public Service Recognition Week, Arbor Day, Western Reserve Academy 200th Anniversary.

Note: The agenda item number for the nonprofit donations resolution appears as TMP-8567 in the agenda but as Resolution 26-73 in the minutes. The summary reflects both references for accuracy.

Meeting Transcript

It's 1930. I'd like to call this meeting to order. Uh, Mayor Anze Vino is out tonight, so um I'm filling in for him. This is a duly noticed workshop of Hudson City Council head in accordance with the sunshine laws of the state of Ohio, Section 121.22 and the City of Hudson Charter. Article 3, Section 3.02 for Tuesday, April 14th, 2026. I'd like to take a moment to welcome everyone here who is in attendance tonight, as well as those who may be watching remotely via the HCTV feed, and we thank the HC TV team for being here tonight. So moving on to the next section. Um correspondence and council comments. Anybody have any comments or um concerns they want to share that hasn't already been shared. Patricia. Last Wednesday at the architectural review board, um they did approve the addition to the dental office on East Main Street here. There'd been some controversy about that. Um but the uh they approved it. The architecture that was put together was very nice, and they're using not a garage door in the back, but um French doors. Um, and most of the neighbors around the area seemed pleased with what they were going to do. Um, but I thought that especially those in Ward 1 should know that um that is taking place. Uh Planning Commission met yesterday. Uh, and just a couple things I know I mentioned to you, but just want to let everyone know. Um, so they would like an update on the issue with retirement facilities and EMS that was brought up a while back. Um so I also let the chair know that if they ever want a specific update from council, um, that they can uh talk with city staff and have it added to their schedule, and then um I can, you know, I or the appropriate person can give them an update as long as I know kind of what the update is and who to get the update from. Um they also discussed um district 11 uh last night and uh specifically related to the comprehensive plan and district 11. Um I don't want to like steal anyone's thunder here. I know we have you all here tonight. Um great discussion last night of how the comprehensive plan um links to uh potential rezoning of district eleven and kind of where it matches up and where it might not match up, which I know we're gonna discuss tonight. Um that was Planning Commission. Yes, uh, I did receive an email from a resident who requested it be read into the record. So I'd like to take this opportunity to do so, and it is in regards to District 11. So keep rolling with that. Um by my count, page nine, titled Complimenting Downtown, the paragraph titled Square Footage Limitations highlight retail size restrictions of up to 1,000 square feet as a use by right and use and up to 220,000 square feet as a conditional use. Then goes on to state generally the creation of a new shopping district requires a large anchor tenant, typically a national brand or big box retailer, to make it viable. For comparison, at Pinecrest, the anchors REI and Whole Foods are 27,000 and 45,000 square feet respectively. It then asserts the proposed size limitations on retail uses within D11 help safeguard that retail uses will not become the primary drivers of foot traffic and activity within the district. Only two pages later, under the title Grocery Illustrations, the presentation offers an illustrative view of the IRG property showing a 40,000 square foot grocery Whole Foods stores ranged between 25 and 55, sorry, 25 and 50,000 square feet according to Google AI. Next to a 20,000 square foot retail conditional use, slightly smaller than the typical REI, but according to Google, well within the typical size range of a GAP Banana Republic, Lululemon, William Sonoma, etc. Does anyone really believe there would be a significant difference between a 45,000 square foot Whole Foods next to a 27 square foot, 27,000 square foot REI at Pinecrest and a potential 40,000 square foot Whole Foods next to a 20,000 square foot national chain retailer in D11? Council needs to put some adult supervision on this D11 proposal, bring it back in alignment with the comprehensive plan, which the charter defines as the operative growth management policy for the municipality, and conduct a review to understand how city staff and two of your current colleagues who, along with the former council president, were on the D11 subcommittee, brought forward a proposal so disconnected from the municipality's operative growth management policy. And conduct a review to understand how city staff and two of your current colleagues who, along with the former council president, were on the D 11 subcommittee, brought forward a proposal so disconnected from the municipality's operative growth management policy. And with such blatant flaws in their supporting logic. Hudson leadership needs to learn from this and develop improved controls and processes to prevent Silomiller government governance and logic failures in the future. Thank you, Tom Mayor. That was all. That is all. Anybody else? So I just have a couple things to make people aware of. So early voting for the library board has begun. So this is a change from previous years where it happened on a one day on a Sunday at the end of April or May. This is now several weeks of voting. You don't have to attend the annual meeting if you cannot attend. So go to the library and vote for the library board. Also, we're early voting for the May election has started down in Summit County Board of Elections, so check their website if you want to go down for early voting at uh at the summit county board of elections.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com