The Planning Commission met on October 11, 2021 at 7:30 PM at Town Hall. Six members were present (one absent). The meeting covered approval of previous minutes, a text amendment for fireworks storage/retail as a conditional use, and a site plan for the Park Lane Square Cultural Campus.
PC 2021-689: Text Amendment for Fireworks Storage and Retail (District 1):
PC 2021-1046: Park Lane Square Cultural Campus Site Plan:
(Note: The meeting also included a brief staff update on Route 91 improvements and a public service announcement about a resident performing the National Anthem at a Browns game.)
Like to call this meeting of a planning commission for October 11th to order. Mr. Sugar, if you could call the roll. Yes. Mr. Laman? Here. Mr. Chaparkoff? Ms. Jones? Here. Mr. Nyslom? Here. Mr. Vaughn? Here. Mr. Stoley. Here. Mr. Engelwitz is not present. And as much as we have six of seven, we have a quorum. So we shall move forward. First order of business is swearing in. Anyone who's planning to give testimony this evening, including the staff, if you'd please stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth? If so, answer I do. Thank you. All right. Just a reminder when you are speaking to the commission. If you'll come to the podium, speak into the microphone, and start your comments by giving your name and address. Appreciate that. Are there any correspondence for the commission to consider that we haven't seen? Not that you haven't seen, just with our first uh our first item, the text amendment, we did have a a letter from uh Mr. Van Such in the representing some of the neighbors that have been forwarded to the board. Right. And I believe that everyone on the board has seen that had a chance to read it. Um public discussion. This is a point where we take up any topics that are not on tonight's agenda. If anyone wishes to speak on anything other than agenda items. I have one thing I'd like to address, and I'd like to give my thanks to Mr. Sugar. Um we've been trying to follow up on 91 South between Stony Hill and Barlow. Um the committee recommended or the commission recommended to the city to move forward with that project, but we had put in some suggestions about aesthetics involving placing the utilities underground based on the information that um was put together by Mr. Wansick. Um to do so would have a price tag of in excess of 2.3 million dollars or a little over a two-block area, which makes that highly unlikely. But I do thank the staff for following up on that. Welcome.