OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hudson, Ohio/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hudson Planning Commission Regular Meeting – May 9, 2022

Planning Commission — Monday, May 9, 2022
BodyHudson, Ohio
SessionPlanning Commission
DateMonday, May 9, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 37:17

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:03

Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Hudson will come to order for its regular May meeting.

0:10

Um first item on our agenda is the roll call.

0:15

Mr.

0:16

Hannon, if you could call a roll, please.

0:22

Here.

0:23

Mr.

0:23

Nightstrom?

0:24

Here.

0:24

Mr.

0:25

Vaughn?

0:25

Here.

0:26

Mr.

0:26

Furby?

0:27

Here.

0:27

Ms.

0:27

Norman?

0:28

Here.

0:29

Mr.

0:29

Scholey.

0:30

Here.

0:31

Mr.

0:31

Lehman's out of town.

0:34

We'll do the swearing in of anyone planning to address the commission this evening.

0:39

If you could stand and raise your right hand.

0:43

Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth?

0:48

If so, say I do.

0:51

Thank you.

0:52

Um is there any correspondence?

0:55

No.

0:55

No correspondence.

0:57

Any items for public discussion that are not on tonight's agenda.

1:03

Seeing we have almost no one here.

1:06

I don't think so.

1:08

Um so we'll move on to the approval of the minutes from our April 11th meeting.

1:14

Are there any additions, changes, corrections from the members?

1:23

I had only one question, um, no correction to add.

1:27

Under 9A other business.

1:32

Um I think that the nature of the discussion that's recorded accurately in the minutes is that the staff was to report back to the commission on the history of some of those items that are listed there and only as a practical matter of procedure.

1:49

I was just curious, since it doesn't say that in the minutes.

1:52

How are we to know?

1:53

How does it come back to us?

1:55

How do we ever find that out?

1:58

Yeah, I apologize.

2:00

I'm just reviewing the minutes myself now.

2:02

This was regarding the administrative rules.

2:05

Right, right.

2:05

And so we had we had a great discussion about it last time.

2:09

Um, and I know it was Nick, so I know it wasn't you, Greg, but it's a oh, you know, yeah, we I'd be happy to report back to you on is in in to my concern specifically the five-week time period.

2:21

Um, and so my question is about how how does that happen?

2:26

We were the current draft of the administrative rules for all three boards are before the solicitor's office right now for review and confirmation before we present them back to the board for formal consideration.

2:37

Okay, so we'll be ready as part of that formal consideration if it's okay to respond further to the five-week.

2:43

Oh, yeah, yeah, yes, absolutely.

2:45

Is it's it's fine.

2:46

It was just it was the uh just reviewing the minutes.

2:49

The question came to my mind.

2:51

Sure.

2:51

So okay, thank you.

2:53

Any other items?

2:55

I have one in item 11.

2:58

I do not believe I made the second um motion to adjourn since I can't move or second.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planned Development█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Procedural██████████████████████████28%
Zoning Code█████████10%
Public Comment████████9%
Public Safety████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Hudson Planning Commission Regular Meeting – May 9, 2022

The Hudson Planning Commission met on Monday, May 9, 2022 at 7:30 PM at Town Hall. Commissioners Jones, Norman, Nystrom, Stolle, and Vaughan were present; Commissioner Lehman was absent. Chair Stolle presided. The meeting focused on a single public hearing for a conditional use request to expand the Sweet Kiddles Day Care Center.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (April 11, 2022): The minutes from the previous meeting were approved as submitted by a vote of 5–0, after a brief discussion clarifying staff reporting procedures and a correction to the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Jones abstained (not present at previous meeting).

Discussion Items

  • Public Hearing – PC 2022-333: Conditional Use for Sweet Kiddles Day Care Center Expansion
    • Proposal: Sweet Kiddles Day Care, currently occupying 6,500 sq ft at 725 West Streetsboro Street, Suite B1, seeks to expand into an adjacent 3,500 sq ft vacant space, totaling approximately 10,000 sq ft. The expansion would add four classrooms and a motor skills area, increasing child capacity from 88 to 124 (a net gain of 36 children) and adding approximately 5 new teachers.
    • Staff Recommendation: Community Development Director Greg Hannan presented the staff report recommending approval with a condition of no overnight accommodations. The applicant submitted an updated traffic study showing no adverse impact, and a parking plan confirming sufficient spaces for all tenants.
    • Applicant Presentation: Robert Kimmel (business owner) and Dale Grieder (architect) presented the floor plan and parking plan. They noted that existing drop-off/pickup zones (8 reserved spaces directly adjacent to the building) are sufficient and that flexible scheduling spreads traffic throughout the day.
    • Commission Questions & Discussion:
      • Commissioner Norman raised concerns about compliance with the previous conditional use condition requiring annual submission of state certification. Staff acknowledged the requirement and agreed to add it as a condition.
      • Commissioner Norman also noted that the Land Development Code (LDC) Section 1206.02(C)(2) requires all preschools to provide a play area of at least 6,000 sq ft. The current outdoor playground is approximately 2,000 sq ft, and the expansion does not increase outdoor play space. The applicant explained that indoor gross motor area is about 800–850 sq ft, with an additional 600 sq ft added. The commission discussed whether the 6,000 sq ft requirement applies (the LDC defines "preschool" as a daycare center) and agreed the code may need revision, but it did not prevent approval given the existing playground usage scheduling and state licensing oversight.
      • Commissioner Furbee asked about emergency egress for infants/toddlers; the applicant described using evacuation cribs and noted the fire marshal had approved the egress plan.
      • Commissioner Vaughan confirmed no concerns after reviewing annual compliance reports available on the state website.
      • Chair Stolle noted the 6,000 sq ft playground requirement appears to be a one-size-fits-all standard that should be reexamined for future cases.

Key Outcomes

  • Approval of Conditional Use (PC 2022-333): The commission voted unanimously (5–0) to approve the conditional use for the expansion of Sweet Kiddles Day Care, subject to three conditions:
    1. The use shall contain no overnight accommodations.
    2. A copy of the annual report with evidence of continuing certification shall be submitted to the Community Development Director in January of each year, demonstrating compliance for all previous years since the business established at the property.
    3. (Added by amendment) The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the certification submission requirement for prior years (2019–2021).
  • Staff Update: Greg Hannan reported that a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Comprehensive Plan Review consultant has been released, with proposals due in early June. City Council is also developing a steering committee composed of residents and representatives from boards, including the Planning Commission. No further applications were anticipated in the coming months.

Meeting Transcript

Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Hudson will come to order for its regular May meeting. Um first item on our agenda is the roll call. Mr. Hannon, if you could call a roll, please. Here. Mr. Nightstrom? Here. Mr. Vaughn? Here. Mr. Furby? Here. Ms. Norman? Here. Mr. Scholey. Here. Mr. Lehman's out of town. We'll do the swearing in of anyone planning to address the commission this evening. If you could stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth? If so, say I do. Thank you. Um is there any correspondence? No. No correspondence. Any items for public discussion that are not on tonight's agenda. Seeing we have almost no one here. I don't think so. Um so we'll move on to the approval of the minutes from our April 11th meeting. Are there any additions, changes, corrections from the members? I had only one question, um, no correction to add. Under 9A other business. Um I think that the nature of the discussion that's recorded accurately in the minutes is that the staff was to report back to the commission on the history of some of those items that are listed there and only as a practical matter of procedure. I was just curious, since it doesn't say that in the minutes. How are we to know? How does it come back to us? How do we ever find that out? Yeah, I apologize. I'm just reviewing the minutes myself now. This was regarding the administrative rules. Right, right. And so we had we had a great discussion about it last time. Um, and I know it was Nick, so I know it wasn't you, Greg, but it's a oh, you know, yeah, we I'd be happy to report back to you on is in in to my concern specifically the five-week time period. Um, and so my question is about how how does that happen? We were the current draft of the administrative rules for all three boards are before the solicitor's office right now for review and confirmation before we present them back to the board for formal consideration.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com