The Hudson Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Monday, June 13, 2022, at 7:30 PM in Town Hall. Five members were present (Ms. Jones, Ms. Norman, Mr. Stolle, Mr. Vaughan, Mr. Furbee) and two were absent (Mr. Lehman, Mr. Nystrom). The commission addressed two public hearings: a conditional use request for a vehicle repair/service facility (Line-X) and a compatibility review and preliminary subdivision request for a cul-de-sac extension on Kilbourne Drive.
1. PC 2022-464 – Conditional Use for Line-X at 5170 Hudson Drive (Units E & F)
2. PC 2022-469 – Compatibility Review and Preliminary Subdivision for Kilbourne Drive Cul-de-Sac Extension
Line-X Conditional Use (PC 2022-464):
Kilbourne Drive – Compatibility Review:
Kilbourne Drive – Preliminary Subdivision:
Other Business:
Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the regular June meeting of the Hudson Planning Commission. Mr. Sugar, if you could call a roll. Yes. Mr. Furby? Present. Ms. Jones? Here. Ms. Norman. Here. Mr. Vaughn? Here. Mr. Stoley. Here. Having five present. We have a quorum. Next door of business is to swear in anyone who is planning to give testimony this evening. If you are, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth? If so, say I do. Thank you. Um I'm not aware of any correspondence to the commission. Mr. Sugar, do we have any? No. Okay. Um at this point we open up the floor for public discussion of any items that are not on tonight's agenda. Does anyone wish to speak about anything other than the agenda items? Okay, if not, um we'll move on to the approval of the minutes from our May 9th meeting. Um all members of the commission receive this in advance. Um are there any discussions Mr. Chairman? I had one, if I may. Sure. Um on page two of the minutes under the public hearings topic. The fourth paragraph of the annotated uh or summarized comments there about the building owners and business owners were identified. If it would uh please the board, the commission, I would like to add the words as non-residents, which was the point of my inquiry on that point, and I believe it it bears being um stated in in the short version of the public record. We know everyone can go and watch the um proceedings themselves for the full content, but I would move to make that amendment. Is there any objection? That's noting the building owners and business owners are non-residents. I wasn't at the meeting, so I'm just gonna do that. Yes, as non-residents, yes. Okay, yes. Okay.