The City of Hudson Planning Commission held a special meeting on July 25, 2022, at 7:30 PM in Town Hall. The meeting was rescheduled from July 11. Acting Chair David Lehman presided with four members present (Lehman, Norman, Nystrom, Furbee) out of seven; Melissa Jones, Ronald Stolle, and Erik Vaughan were absent. The commission considered two conditional use applications and received a legal review of Land Development Code Section 1204.01.
Welcome to a stated, although uh it's a different date than originally planned to the City of Hudson's Planning Commission. Mr. Sugar, could we have a roll call, please? Yes. Uh Mr. Furby. Mr. Nistrom. Here. Ms. Norman. Here. Mr. Lehman. Here. Thank you. Next, we'll swear in uh city staff and then anyone who's planning on speaking tonight, if you could please rise. Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury that the testimony you give will be the truth? Thank you. Next is we have the correspondence not relating to uh tonight. Anything else that's come in, Mr. Sugar? Oh, just for the two files. We've received correspondence, which we'll highlight individually. Okay, and uh we could have public discussion. Again, this would be anything not relating to tonight. Um what's on the agenda. Okay, and then finally we have uh approval of the minutes from the June 13th meeting. However, in perusing it, uh we only have two people tonight who were present at that meeting, so we'll have to carry the minutes over to the next meeting when we have more people who were present at the June meeting to approach. Mr. Chairman, would it be appropriate for me to suggest a correction of a typo in advance of that? If you have it, then that's not uh uh voting on it, and then they can uh do that. I'll just call that to Mr. Sugar's attention on page two. Um, under item A, the fourth paragraph down that begins with the commission. The second line from the bottom in um partial quotations is regular waster is what it looks like. The first time I read it, I said, Oh, it must be regular water. And then I went back and I said, No, I think it's regular waste, and then I realized that indeed it really mattered whether we had that right or not. So I just bring that to your attention for next meeting. Okay, I'll clarify that. Thanks, Ms. Norman. Um I don't think we have any old business, so we have two hearings tonight that um are kind of revisits from uh prior cases. Now we have four in attendance out of our usual seven, so it'll take three to uh to pass a motion. If uh a vote was to be two-two, that would be a uh failure. So uh any applicant um before us, if it's looking like uh you know it might be you know a two-two vote or something, you can ask for the a continuance uh so that it's before the full board and we would hold it at a future meeting then. Um now because these are re-hearings for for both of these uh cases, and then particularly the first one it expired uh because they did not initiate the or attain the zoning certificate uh within the one year of a approval. We should really be focusing on any new recommendations or the elements that uh you know cause this to come before us that are different than what was already approved, kind of under starry decisis. Um we've already considered uh the case, but we really want to look at what's different. So if anybody's gonna be speaking tonight, um that's probably where you'd want to put most of your focus on.