OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hudson, Ohio/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hudson, Ohio Planning Commission Meeting – November 28, 2022

Planning Commission — Monday, November 28, 2022
BodyHudson, Ohio
SessionPlanning Commission
DateMonday, November 28, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:15:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

Good evening.

0:02

Call a special meeting of the City of Hudson Planning Commission to order.

0:08

It's 7.30 p.m.

0:09

This is a continuation of the November 14th meeting, which unfortunately had to be adjourned.

0:16

As some of you know about 1145 because the building was being locked.

0:21

So those of you who were here on the 14th and went home without being heard, I apologize.

0:30

But the conditions just got out of control a bit.

0:36

And we're working to make sure that never happens again.

0:41

Mr.

0:41

Sugar, if you could please call a roll.

0:44

Yes.

0:45

Mr.

0:46

Furby?

0:46

Here.

0:47

Ms.

0:47

Jones.

0:48

Here.

0:49

Ms.

0:49

Norman?

0:50

Here.

0:50

Mr.

0:51

Nystrom.

0:52

Here.

0:52

Mr.

0:52

Vaughan?

0:53

Here.

0:53

Mr.

0:54

Stoley.

0:55

Here.

0:56

With the required quorum of the Commission members being present, we'll proceed with tonight's agenda.

1:03

For those of you who walked in, there is an agenda at the back of the room if you didn't pick that up already.

1:10

Anyone wishing to speak tonight must be sworn in.

1:13

I'll do that in a minute.

1:15

Please note any public comment under agenda item 5 relates to issues not on tonight's agenda.

1:22

It's not on tonight's agenda.

1:24

So if you're here for the Lower Lake application, you can be heard during that public hearing.

1:33

And anyone who has submitted written comments regarding tonight's application, rest assured your communications will be duly recorded in the public record of tonight's meetings.

1:44

So for anyone, including staff planning to address the commission tonight on any issue, you need to be sworn in.

1:51

Please stand and raise your right hand.

1:56

Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury?

2:00

The testimony you give tonight will be the truth.

2:03

If so, answer I do.

2:05

Thank you.

2:07

When it is your time to address the commission, please approach the podium, speak directly into the microphone, and begin your comments by stating your name and address.

2:21

As is our normal procedure, public comments are generally limited to not more than five minutes per person.

2:28

And in the interest of an orderly and timely meeting, I would ask tonight that if you dress address the commission regarding the Lower Lake application on September 12th, which this is a continuation of that hearing, you either refrain from addressing the Commission or limit your comments to issues not previously addressed.

2:52

That's in the interest of time and getting through tonight's agenda.

2:58

Agenda item four.

3:00

This is where we ask if there's been any communications received by commission members or staff not relating to tonight's public hearing.

3:11

Before I ask the Commission members, I will note that I've received 24 emails as of 2.30 this afternoon since our last meeting on November 14th regarding the pending Hudson Community Life application.

3:30

In all instances of those 24 emails, every member of the commission received a copy of that.

3:37

And I'm a um May I inquire, Mr.

3:40

Chairman.

3:40

Did um I think I I got one from Joyce Sandone, but it didn't indicate any other members.

3:45

I just wanted to make sure that that one was received by all the other commission members.

3:50

I don't recall offhand because there's been so many, but um if I notice that they aren't going to all the commission members, I would have brought it forth.

3:59

So I will I'll deliver that to Mr.

4:02

Sugar then to make sure it gets distributed.

4:04

To answer your question, I did get that one as well, Ms.

4:06

Norman.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planned Development█████████████████████████25%
Land Use Regulation█████████████████████████25%
Public Engagement████████████12%
Procedural███████████11%
Public Comment██████████10%
Planning Commission█████5%
Code Enforcement███3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Educational Institutions██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Hudson, Ohio Planning Commission Meeting – November 28, 2022

The Hudson Planning Commission held a special meeting on Monday, November 28, 2022, at 7:30 p.m. at Town Hall, 27 East Main Street. Chair Ronald Stolle presided, with Commissioners David Lehman, Andrew Furbee, Melissa Jones, Sarah Norman, David Nystrom, and Erik Vaughan present. The main item was the continued public hearing for PC 2022-823, a conditional use request from Laurel Lake retirement community to build seven additional duplex buildings for up to 14 dwelling units. Testimony was given under oath.

Laurel Lake Conditional Use (PC 2022-823)

  • The public hearing was continued from September 12, 2022, and the applicant had been asked to address site constraints. Chair Stolle reported that he met with eight Laurel Lake board members on October 24, 2022, to explain the continuation.
  • City Planner Nicholas Sugar said the plan had been reduced from nine to seven duplex buildings, with two buildings relocated to an inner ring. A wetland delineation had been completed, and storm water and other engineering studies would be completed during final site plan review.
  • Laurel Lake’s marketing director presented the applicant’s position: the project was needed to help rebalance the community’s housing mix from the current 70% independent living / 30% health care toward an optimal 80% / 20% ratio. The applicant requested provisional approval of the conditional use and said more detailed engineering and site plan approvals would follow.
  • Several commissioners asked about the definition of continuing care retirement community under the Land Development Code, whether the use standards had been fully analyzed in the staff report, and whether future duplex construction would require separate approval. Some commissioners said they were comfortable continuing the case because wetland approvals and final site plan review would provide later safeguards.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No non-agenda public comments were offered. The Chair noted he had received 24 emails about the separate Hudson Community Life application; that continued hearing was scheduled for December 14, 2022.
  • Residents, including Mr. Brickley and Larry King of 52 Laurel Lake Drive, testified during the Laurel Lake hearing. They expressed opposition to parts of the plan, especially the location of Villa 5, destruction of riparian zone vegetation, and the lack of written information from Laurel Lake explaining the latest site changes and the reasons for the project. Larry King said a Laurel Lake community meeting had not provided new information.
  • Chair Stolle responded that an ongoing dispute between Laurel Lake’s owners and some community residents was outside the Planning Commission’s jurisdiction.

Discussion and Procedural Matters

  • After public testimony, staff and commissioners discussed turnaround requirements, potential Land Development Code violations, floodplain and storm water review, and how final site plan approval would address those issues.
  • The Commission also discussed its own processes, including the short time between receiving staff reports and meeting dates, the option to ask the city solicitor code interpretation questions, and the need to avoid backlogs by not delaying decisions that were ready to be considered.
  • The next regular Planning Commission meeting was set for December 12, 2022, and the separate Hudson Community Life continued hearing was set for December 14, 2022.

Key Outcomes

  • The Planning Commission granted conditional use approval for PC 2022-823, allowing Laurel Lake to proceed with the seven-duplex, up to 14-unit proposal subject to the conditions in the November 22, 2022 staff report and future final site plan approval.
  • The applicant must return for final site plan review, including storm water, wetland, landscape, and architectural compliance before construction.
  • Minutes from prior meetings were deferred to the December 12, 2022 meeting because they had not yet been circulated.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Call a special meeting of the City of Hudson Planning Commission to order. It's 7.30 p.m. This is a continuation of the November 14th meeting, which unfortunately had to be adjourned. As some of you know about 1145 because the building was being locked. So those of you who were here on the 14th and went home without being heard, I apologize. But the conditions just got out of control a bit. And we're working to make sure that never happens again. Mr. Sugar, if you could please call a roll. Yes. Mr. Furby? Here. Ms. Jones. Here. Ms. Norman? Here. Mr. Nystrom. Here. Mr. Vaughan? Here. Mr. Stoley. Here. With the required quorum of the Commission members being present, we'll proceed with tonight's agenda. For those of you who walked in, there is an agenda at the back of the room if you didn't pick that up already. Anyone wishing to speak tonight must be sworn in. I'll do that in a minute. Please note any public comment under agenda item 5 relates to issues not on tonight's agenda. It's not on tonight's agenda. So if you're here for the Lower Lake application, you can be heard during that public hearing. And anyone who has submitted written comments regarding tonight's application, rest assured your communications will be duly recorded in the public record of tonight's meetings. So for anyone, including staff planning to address the commission tonight on any issue, you need to be sworn in. Please stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm under the penalty of perjury? The testimony you give tonight will be the truth. If so, answer I do. Thank you. When it is your time to address the commission, please approach the podium, speak directly into the microphone, and begin your comments by stating your name and address. As is our normal procedure, public comments are generally limited to not more than five minutes per person. And in the interest of an orderly and timely meeting, I would ask tonight that if you dress address the commission regarding the Lower Lake application on September 12th, which this is a continuation of that hearing, you either refrain from addressing the Commission or limit your comments to issues not previously addressed. That's in the interest of time and getting through tonight's agenda. Agenda item four. This is where we ask if there's been any communications received by commission members or staff not relating to tonight's public hearing. Before I ask the Commission members, I will note that I've received 24 emails as of 2.30 this afternoon since our last meeting on November 14th regarding the pending Hudson Community Life application.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com