OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hudson, Ohio/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hudson Planning Commission Meeting – April 10, 2023: Admin Rules and LDC Updates Discussed

Planning Commission — Monday, April 10, 2023
BodyHudson, Ohio
SessionPlanning Commission
DateMonday, April 10, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:36:23

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:04

We are in session.

0:10

For anyone watching at home, we call this meeting to order.

0:14

This is a regular monthly meeting of the comprehensive planning commission.

0:23

It's in a couple weeks.

0:24

Yes.

0:28

Mr.

0:28

Sugar, if you'd call the roll.

0:30

Yes, Mr.

0:31

Nystrum.

0:32

Here.

0:32

Mr.

0:33

Furby?

0:34

Ms.

0:34

Jones.

0:36

Here.

0:36

Ms.

0:37

Norman.

0:38

Here.

0:38

Mr.

0:39

Romano.

0:40

Here.

0:40

Mr.

0:41

Vaughan.

0:41

Here.

0:42

Mr.

0:42

Stoley.

0:43

Here.

0:44

We have a full house.

0:46

Swearing in.

0:50

Since staff will be speaking to the commission, I guess I have to administer the oath to you.

0:55

Do you swear or affirm under the penal till you have perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth?

1:01

If so, say I do.

1:03

Okay.

1:05

I'm not aware of any correspondence to the commission.

1:08

Mr.

1:08

Sugar.

1:09

None?

1:10

Public discussion.

1:12

We have none since the public is not present.

1:16

Approval of the minutes, item six.

1:19

We have minutes from March 13th.

1:24

I have a couple minor corrections.

1:26

I don't know if others do.

1:30

Nothing major.

1:32

I had a question, Mr.

1:34

Sole.

1:35

Yes.

1:35

On page four.

1:44

Otherwise, we have to do that.

1:45

Oh, cut off a bit here.

1:47

Yeah.

1:48

Do we know what caused that?

1:50

Is it just on the printed versions?

1:53

I think it's when we transferred it to a PDF.

1:56

It might have cut off.

1:57

So we can I mean I'm not I don't have any changes to make, and I don't want to hold up making that progress, but there were a lot this time that I don't remember seeing before.

2:06

Also at the bottom of page four.

2:09

Um Ms Ms.

2:11

Orend looks like Ms.

2:14

Orange on the very last line.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation████████████████████████████████32%
Procedural███████████████████19%
Administrative Rules█████████████13%
Public Engagement███████████11%
Planned Development████████8%
Public Comment█████5%
Energy and Sustainability███3%
Code Enforcement███3%
Public Records█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Hudson Planning Commission Meeting – April 10, 2023

The Hudson Planning Commission convened on April 10, 2023 at 7:30 PM. The meeting included approval of the March 13, 2023 minutes with corrections, a detailed discussion on amendments to the Planning Commission's Administrative Rules, and an introduction to potential topics for the 2023 Land Development Code (LDC) updates. No public comments were received.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (March 13, 2023): The minutes were approved as amended (5 ayes, 2 abstentions). Minor corrections included fixing a typographical error on page four and clarifying the outcome of a previous application (continued, not withdrawn).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public offered comments.

Discussion Items

  • Amendments to Planning Commission Administrative Rules:

    • Staff proposed language to lock agenda submittals after posting (Thursday before the meeting) to improve transparency and prevent last-minute changes.
    • Commissioners debated flexibility: some preferred a strict cutoff, others sought discretionary language to allow minor changes or clarifications at the meeting.
    • Concerns were raised about notice to neighbors and the public, ensuring the process remains transparent.
    • Additional issues included time limits for applicant presentations, the meeting order (swearing-in before minutes approval), use of “calendar days” for deadlines, and clarification of documentation requirements for applications.
    • Chair Stolle noted that the rules require two readings; the discussion constituted the first exposure. Staff will produce a revised redline and seek legal opinion on certain items.
  • 2023 LDC Update – Introduction of Draft Topics:

    • Community Development Director Greg Hannan presented a memo listing potential code amendments, including: blending of residential development density, definition of institutional uses, regulation of vape shops and similar uses, townhome garage orientation, solar code review, code enforcement definitions, storage of hazardous materials, conditional use licensing, stream corridor setbacks, and performance bonds.
    • A significant portion of discussion focused on whether to pursue incremental “patchwork” fixes or a comprehensive overhaul of the LDC. Several commissioners advocated for a holistic review in conjunction with the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update, possibly with the help of an outside consultant.
    • Commissioner Vaughan raised the issue of including all residential units (e.g., in retirement communities) in the annual growth management report, which currently counts only single-family homes.
    • The Commission agreed to place a discussion of a larger-scale LDC review on the May agenda.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to place LDC review on May agenda: Passed unanimously (7-0).
  • Admin Rules: The discussion was considered a first reading; staff will bring a revised draft and legal opinion to the next meeting.
  • No formal votes were taken on LDC topic proposals; these will be further refined and referred to City Council.
  • Staff Update: Nick Sugar noted a pending application from Western Reserve Academy for parking conversion and a possible application from Drees Homes.
  • Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:06 PM.

Meeting Transcript

We are in session. For anyone watching at home, we call this meeting to order. This is a regular monthly meeting of the comprehensive planning commission. It's in a couple weeks. Yes. Mr. Sugar, if you'd call the roll. Yes, Mr. Nystrum. Here. Mr. Furby? Ms. Jones. Here. Ms. Norman. Here. Mr. Romano. Here. Mr. Vaughan. Here. Mr. Stoley. Here. We have a full house. Swearing in. Since staff will be speaking to the commission, I guess I have to administer the oath to you. Do you swear or affirm under the penal till you have perjury that the testimony you give tonight will be the truth? If so, say I do. Okay. I'm not aware of any correspondence to the commission. Mr. Sugar. None? Public discussion. We have none since the public is not present. Approval of the minutes, item six. We have minutes from March 13th. I have a couple minor corrections. I don't know if others do. Nothing major. I had a question, Mr. Sole. Yes. On page four. Otherwise, we have to do that. Oh, cut off a bit here.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com