OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Janesville, Wisconsin/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Plan Commission Special Session on Zoning Ordinance Recodification - October 1, 2026

Meeting Portal — Thursday, October 1, 2026
BodyJanesville, Wisconsin
SessionMeeting Portal
DateThursday, October 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:01:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Good evening.

0:01

I would like to call the Plan Commission meeting, the special session to order on Thursday, October 1st, 2026.

0:08

First item on the agenda is roll call.

Speaker 2

0:11

Commissioner Nino.

0:13

Commissioner Bowerman.

0:15

Commissioner Cass.

0:16

Here.

0:17

Commissioner Williams.

0:18

Here.

0:18

Commissioner Vosco.

Speaker 1

0:20

Here.

Speaker 2

0:20

Commissioner Dongera.

Speaker 1

0:22

Here.

Speaker 2

0:22

And Commissioner Madere.

0:24

Here.

0:24

Five present.

0:25

We have a quorum.

Speaker 1

0:26

Thank you.

0:26

And you know, you should never give me the second item on the agenda, opening remarks, because I have a lot of opening remarks, but I do not believe it was meant to be for me.

0:35

So I will defer to you, Dwayne, or any other staff member who might have opening remarks.

0:40

Yes, I'd be happy to cover that.

0:42

So

Speaker 2

0:44

yeah, the special plan commission meeting this evening is intended to focus on the uh what we hope to be and expect to be the final round of revisions to the uh update to the zonings, excuse me, City of Janesville's zoning ordinance, the zoning code rewrite.

1:01

And specifically, we have representatives from the consulting firm uh that have been assisting us throughout this process, grave here this evening with Craig and Tim in attendance to kind of uh uh tag team uh the presentation at least highlighting the significant revisions and why those changes are being recommended.

1:24

It essentially falls into two different categories.

1:28

Uh one that responds directly directly to the uh the public comments that were received on the full draft version of the code that has been made publicly available for three months now.

1:44

And the second uh is a category of changes that have been identified by staff working through the uh the draft regulations as we've applied those to uh potential projects and gone through the citywide remapping process and other clarifications and um uh

Unassigned speaker

2:07

I

Speaker 2

2:07

guess modifications of the code that we feel are appropriate for consideration of uh application of the code.

Unassigned speaker

2:16

So,

Speaker 2

2:16

with that, uh we also will like to touch on the upcoming public open house event, which is scheduled for next Tuesday on October 6th at the Headburg Public Library and talk a little bit about what that process will include or event will include, and uh and then next step.

2:34

So I think without further explanation, that is the intent of the meeting, the discussion tonight.

2:40

We're hopeful that the

Unassigned speaker

2:41

plan

Speaker 2

2:42

commission has uh questions and then at the very least could provide guidance direction to staff and and the consultant in terms of what should be incorporated into the code by way of uh potential revisions, and that's all I have.

2:58

Thanks.

Speaker 1

2:59

Thank you.

3:00

All right, are there any questions before we start the presentation?

Unassigned speaker

3:04

Can

Speaker 3

3:04

I ask are you just gonna do this on a page-by-page basis?

Speaker 4

3:09

We're gonna highlight uh

Unassigned speaker

3:11

the different things,

Speaker 4

3:12

but we're we'll be open to talking about any.

Speaker 3

3:14

Okay, because you know, because

Unassigned speaker

3:16

we

Speaker 3

3:16

do have a page by page, and then I take it on the the addendum there uh on the uh on data centers.

3:24

We'll spend some time on it.

Speaker 5

3:27

Okay,

Speaker 3

3:28

good.

Speaker 1

3:32

All right, thanks for coming.

3:34

Yes, you

Speaker 4

3:35

bet.

Unassigned speaker

3:35

Good to see everyone again, Craig Heemner uh with Grafe along with Tim Schwecky with Civitech.

Speaker 4

3:40

Um, as Dwayne mentioned, uh two main things that we're gonna talk about uh our consultants and staff recommendations for for updates since the last time, um, and then a little bit about hopefully uh project closeout with this.

3:53

So um, as you recall, uh back in June, we had the second open house.

3:58

Um at that meeting, there was very huge turnout with lots of feedback in addition to the feedback that we heard there.

4:05

There were um about 125 online comments specifically on that draft zoning code.

4:10

Um, so what's your memo in front of you has um is a breakdown of different kind of major categories.

4:18

There's obviously a lot of different rows and specific feedback.

4:22

What my hope is tonight is I'm gonna highlight just a couple where we as a consultant team are recommending changes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████45%
Data Center Regulation█████████████████████████████████33%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Environmental Protection█████5%
Procedural███3%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Plan Commission Special Session on Zoning Ordinance Recodification - October 1, 2026

The Plan Commission held a special session on October 1, 2026, to review final recommendations from consulting firm GRAEF on the City of Janesville’s Zoning Code Rewrite. The meeting focused on responding to 125 public comments, staff-identified revisions from stress-testing the regulations and the remapping process, and a detailed proposal for regulating data centers through a planned development district process. The commission also discussed the upcoming public open house on the draft zoning map scheduled for October 6. Five commissioners were present, establishing a quorum.

Discussion Items

  • Zoning Code Revisions (GRAEF Update): Consultant Craig Heemner presented changes in response to public comments. Revisions included updating definitions of building scale to align with future comprehensive plans, expanding provisions for neighborhood-serving commercial uses in residential districts (while retaining a 75-foot height limit), and adding a “new and emerging land uses” section to review large or unanticipated industrial projects.
  • Land Use Table Adjustments: Major utility installations were changed from permitted to conditional uses, while minor utilities (e.g., lift stations) remained permitted. Mixed-use residential uses were expanded as conditional uses in multifamily districts (R3, B2). The P3 designation was retained for a limited number of uses.
  • Staff-Identified Revisions: Staff recommendations included expanding live-work dwellings and family daycares as permitted uses, adjusting lot area requirements in the R3 and B2 districts to improve housing density alignment, and revising landscaping, lighting, and stormwater standards.
  • Anti-Monotony Standards: Commissioner Madare noted that the code revision changed garage design requirements for multifamily buildings from mandatory to recommended. Staff confirmed this was to support housing affordability and expand housing opportunities. Commissioner Cass raised concerns about monotony in large apartment complexes affecting aesthetics and public safety; staff clarified that those projects are regulated under separate architectural design standards.
  • Environmental Standards in Landscaping and Lighting: Commissioner Madare requested language to encourage native prairie grasses in buffer zones and wildlife-friendly lighting (color spectrum) to reduce light pollution. The consultant team indicated openness to adding these provisions.
  • Data Center Regulation Proposal:
    • Data centers were reclassified from a standard P3 use to a new division under Article 8: Alternative Development Options.
    • This classification requires a Planned Development District (PDD) approval process, which includes two public hearings (Plan Commission and City Council) and a final development plan review.
    • Data centers would be allowed in M1 and M2 industrial districts via rezoning.
    • Commissioner Madare requested explicit consideration of air emissions, wastewater discharge and pretreatment, and the city’s ability to hire expert consultants at developer expense. Consultant Craig noted the code outlines 17 different performance categories for evaluation. Dwayne noted a companion ordinance is being drafted by the City Council to provide additional guardrails beyond the zoning code.
  • Zoning Map and Open House: The commission discussed an informal open house scheduled for Tuesday, October 6, at the Headburg Public Library (5:30-7 PM) for public review of the draft zoning map. The comment window for the zoning map was set to close on Friday, October 16.

Key Outcomes

  • Commission Endorsement: The Plan Commission endorsed moving forward with the balance of the revisions in the staff technical memorandum, providing direction to staff and consultants to incorporate the discussed changes into the final draft.
  • Data Center Regulatory Path: Endorsed the planned development district framework for data centers, ensuring project-specific review and two public hearings. A companion ordinance will address additional performance standards.
  • Public Comment Period on Zoning Map: The public comment period for the draft zoning map runs through October 16, 2026, following the October 6 open house.
  • Next Steps: The complete draft of the Zoning Code, Zoning Map, and Subdivision Ordinance are targeted for formal public hearing and City Council adoption by the end of 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kathy Erdman (1516 Southridge Drive) expressed concern over the lack of specific performance standards for data centers, particularly regarding sound and vibration. She noted the companion ordinance is on a different schedule and proposed temporarily removing the data center section from the zoning code for approval alongside that ordinance, citing the existing 12-month moratorium as providing sufficient time to align them.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. I would like to call the Plan Commission meeting, the special session to order on Thursday, October 1st, 2026. First item on the agenda is roll call. Commissioner Nino. Commissioner Bowerman. Commissioner Cass. Here. Commissioner Williams. Here. Commissioner Vosco. Here. Commissioner Dongera. Here. And Commissioner Madere. Here. Five present. We have a quorum. Thank you. And you know, you should never give me the second item on the agenda, opening remarks, because I have a lot of opening remarks, but I do not believe it was meant to be for me. So I will defer to you, Dwayne, or any other staff member who might have opening remarks. Yes, I'd be happy to cover that. So yeah, the special plan commission meeting this evening is intended to focus on the uh what we hope to be and expect to be the final round of revisions to the uh update to the zonings, excuse me, City of Janesville's zoning ordinance, the zoning code rewrite. And specifically, we have representatives from the consulting firm uh that have been assisting us throughout this process, grave here this evening with Craig and Tim in attendance to kind of uh uh tag team uh the presentation at least highlighting the significant revisions and why those changes are being recommended. It essentially falls into two different categories. Uh one that responds directly directly to the uh the public comments that were received on the full draft version of the code that has been made publicly available for three months now. And the second uh is a category of changes that have been identified by staff working through the uh the draft regulations as we've applied those to uh potential projects and gone through the citywide remapping process and other clarifications and um uh I guess modifications of the code that we feel are appropriate for consideration of uh application of the code. So, with that, uh we also will like to touch on the upcoming public open house event, which is scheduled for next Tuesday on October 6th at the Headburg Public Library and talk a little bit about what that process will include or event will include, and uh and then next step. So I think without further explanation, that is the intent of the meeting, the discussion tonight. We're hopeful that the plan commission has uh questions and then at the very least could provide guidance direction to staff and and the consultant in terms of what should be incorporated into the code by way of uh potential revisions, and that's all I have. Thanks. Thank you. All right, are there any questions before we start the presentation? Can I ask are you just gonna do this on a page-by-page basis? We're gonna highlight uh the different things, but we're we'll be open to talking about any. Okay, because you know, because we do have a page by page, and then I take it on the the addendum there uh on the uh on data centers. We'll spend some time on it. Okay, good. All right, thanks for coming.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com