The Kirkland City Council met on July 18, 2023, beginning with a 5:30 p.m. study session (a special joint meeting with the Planning Commission, a 2044 Comprehensive Plan status update, and a Phase 1 review of Community-Initiated Amendment Requests) and reconvening for the regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. All seven council members were present: Mayor Penny Sweet, Deputy Mayor Jay Arnold, and Councilmembers Neal Black, Kelli Curtis, Amy Falcone, Toby Nixon, and Jon Pascal. Six Planning Commissioners were also present for the joint study session. The council took final action on the NE 85th Street Station Area Plan Phase 2 ordinances, approved a parks levy ballot measure ordinance for the November 7, 2023 special election, and made determinations on three Community-Initiated Amendment Requests. The meeting adjourned at 11:48 p.m.
That's good. You can see about two weeks. So it's just more of that. Yeah, I think we get it next year. Other people who are my God. Here. Council member Curtis. Here. Council Member Balcom. Here's Council Member Classical. Here. Deputy Mayor Hardy. Here. Here. Commissioner High. Commissioner Allen. Commissioner Vice Chair. Brotherbird. Chair Brecer. Here. And Commissioner Rosman. Here. And Commissioner. Yeah. That's it. Our study session tonight is on three topics. First, the special joint meeting with the planning community. Second, is it 2020 2044 comprehensive planning status update? And third is phase one review of the 2023-2024 community initiated amendment requests. We expect to reconvene or rigid the meeting at approximately 7 30. Okay. Welcome. Appreciate you attending. This is a follow-up to the joint meeting when you want to make sure that we had a chance to talk with the council directly on issues that were very important to the community to the commission. So the first probably third of the study session is going to be about the commission presenting to their council their thoughts on the stationary plan, particularly the housing affordable housing provisions as well as some of the parking provisions. Those items are not here at the study session, they're in the business section of the council meeting tonight, but we wanted to make sure we had an opportunity here from the planning commission. So staff will be here to answer questions as well. But we're going to start off here from Trisha Rosman on the housing, and then from Chair Osser on the parking issues. So yes. Okay. So I just want to start with kind of a history for the council of where we landed here. So we started, you know, many moons ago on the stationary plan in general and had our public hearing for the non-affordable housing requirements back in February. At that time, um we were brought an um initial proposal for the affordable housing requirements. And as a commission decided that it was very late in the process and there was no data to back it up. And as Kirkland is a very data-driven city, we asked staff and Arch to come back and spend some time really digging into whether these numbers could work or not. And so just as a reminder, that initial proposal was at 20 to 25% of units at 50% AMI. After that time, Arch hired Bay Area Economics to do a feasibility study and came back to us in April with a proposal of 15% at 50% AMI. At that time, we were um presented from Bay Area Economics stating that these numbers are not feasible and that at 15% at 50% AMI housing was not financiable at this time. And um if the returns are not high enough, uh that money from the banks will go to other areas where projects are financial. Um and with that, we spent a lot of time as planning commissioners really digging into this, and ultimately we came to a conclusion that we cannot wait for housing for five, eight, ten more years.