The Kirkland City Council met on July 16, 2024, beginning with a 5:30 p.m. study session and reconvening for a 7:30 p.m. regular meeting in the City Council Chamber. All seven councilmembers were present: Mayor Kelli Curtis, Deputy Mayor Jay Arnold, and Councilmembers Neal Black, Amy Falcone, Jon Pascal, Penny Sweet, and John Tymczyszyn. The study session covered the Transportation Strategic Plan (TSP)/Transportation Element update and the Houghton Village Development Plan update. The regular meeting included public comment, a consent calendar, adoption of Goat Hill zoning amendments, approval of a city flag creation process, reports, and a closed session. There were no honors, proclamations, public hearings, or special presentations.
Thank you. I'd like to call to order the city council meeting of July 16th, 2024. Deputy Mayor Arnold is online and will be joining us in person shortly. City Clerk, will you please call the roll? Council Member Tim Chishon. Here. Council Member Black. Here. Council Member Sweet. Here. Council Member Falcon. Here. Councilmember Pascal. Here. Deputy Mayor Arnold. Here. Mayor Curtis. Here. Our study session tonight is on two items. First is an update on the transportation strategic plan and the transportation element. Second is an update on the Houghton Village Development Plan. We expect to reconvene our regular meeting at 7 30 city manager. Okay, thank you, Madam Mayor. So yeah, we're hoping about 45 minutes for each uh topic, so I'll keep an eye on the clock. Um our first update is gonna be provided by our transportation manager, Doug McIntyre and our transportation planner, Kim Scrivener, and we're gonna give you an update on what's been happening, and we're looking for a council feedback. Welcome. Thank you, City Manager. Um Curtis, Council, Doug, did you want to start introducing? Okay. I'm gonna go ahead and share the screen and started here. Great, good evening. Um so looking forward to hearing your comments on the transportation element and also the fiscally constrained project list. Um, just as a reminder, um, tonight we're talking about the transportation element. This is the the um the section of the comprehensive plan um where we include our goals and policies, our um, and essentially all of the pieces of the of the full transportation strategic plan that are required under GMA. Um the fiscally constrained project list that we're going that we'll be talking about tonight also um goes into the comprehensive plan as part of our capital facilities plan. Um, and then we are still, and then for the the transportation element, the the version that you're seeing tonight is an amended version as amended by the planning commission and the the transportation commission has spent a significant amount of time on that as well. We are still working on the transportation strategic plan. Again, that is a standalone document that'll include a lot more detail, a more narrative about the various topics, and the universe of projects, both funded and funded. So for the transportation element, um the structure of the document, we're really looking at the um just outlining the purpose and vision, our existing conditions, the goals and policies, and the and then we also address the concurrency in our measurement process, which I will get into in a minute. Um for the purpose and vision, also just a reminder. Um, we are um uh folding in our approach for safety, um, incorporating our safe systems approach and also complete streets as part of uh the overall framework for the transportation element and the transportation strategic plan. Um and then the the there are some of the goals and policies that were amended by the planning commission that are outlined in your packet. That was from the um the joint or excuse me, the um public hearing with them last month. So for concurrency and measurement, want to spend a little bit of time on this. The um we are required to balance um transportation with future growth. And um, so as part of the section, we're um we also have a little discussion about the transportation impact fees. We have a table for level of service standards, which is also a requirement, and then we talk a little bit about our transportation projects on our finance plan, and as a reminder about the the financial plan, it's uh we are required to have a fiscally constrained project list that's based on the 20-year projection of our local funds. Um for the concurrency and mitigation. Um what we do is we have a two-pronged approach where we look at our multimodal system and look at this um the the projects that we build, um, that essentially both all types of projects, and we calculate uh uh um what we call person trips, and as development occurs, we um so when projects get added, we're adding person trips to the system, and then when development gets added, they're um contributing to more person trips, and so this is the this is that balance between um development and transportation, um and this is um essentially you know what we look at in terms of the multimodal level of concurrency, but um level of service, which is we also call concurrency. Um that is a requirement.