OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Meeting - February 10, 2022: Bridle Trails Neighborhood Center CAR Public Hearing

Planning CommissionThursday, February 10, 2022
BodyKirkland, Washington
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, February 10, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

We're going to have three speakers for and three speakers against if we have that many.

0:08

So I think we shall start um with the public comment.

0:13

And this is specifically not for the public hearing.

0:16

This is for anything unrelated to bridal trails.

0:21

And then we will get to the public hearing piece.

0:26

So it appears we do not have anyone here to speak about anything separately.

0:35

Anyone?

0:36

No.

0:36

Okay.

0:37

It appears we are just here to talk about bridal trails.

0:41

So with that, I think it is time to open the public hearing.

0:47

We need to make a motion.

0:50

Second.

0:51

Yep.

0:52

Motion to all in favor.

0:56

Okay.

0:57

All right.

0:57

And with that, the uh public hearing is open.

1:07

Scott, did you want to present first and then we will have comments or would do we want to start with?

1:14

Yes.

1:15

Yeah, let's let me start off with the presentation.

1:18

Uh that could be followed by a yeah, so that if anyone has any questions and you can answer them first, then yeah, and then um yeah, also this could be followed by a presentation by the applicant.

1:33

Okay.

1:33

Yep.

1:35

Okay.

1:36

So everyone in the audience, if you are here to speak, um hang on to your questions.

1:42

Hopefully, um Scott and the applicant can maybe answer some of them, and then we will take comment directly after those two presentations before we begin our deliberation.

1:52

Well, let me start to share my screen.

1:58

Uh share screen one.

2:01

Share.

2:04

All right.

2:05

So everyone see the screen.

2:07

Yes.

2:08

All right, good.

2:10

Well, um, welcome uh commissioners to um this uh public hearing uh related to the bridal trails neighborhood center uh community initiated amendment request.

2:23

Um just as a brief agenda for tonight's meeting, uh you'll receive a presentation by staff, you know, followed you know by you know some questions, as we said, you know, and a presentation by um the applicant in this order, and then conduct a public hearing to receive the uh public comments, and then after receiving public comments, you will be deliberating on a recommendation to the city council.

3:00

So as everyone here knows, and most definitely everyone in the audience probably knows that the that this uh policy was developed um back in 2018 um throughout that year.

3:18

Uh senior uh senior planning staff had uh engaged the uh neighborhood um with a neighborhood plan update in which the policy BT7, which we're gonna discuss tonight, had been um created um with some heavy public input.

3:40

Uh the policy is to encourage redevelopment uh with thoughtful design of the shopping center and uh with increased development capacity, additional performance standards would be adhered to.

3:58

Um this is the applicant's request.

4:04

They are requesting to uh make a zoning text amendment to um help uh develop a design program, development standards, and design guidelines consistent with this policy.

4:19

Um meet the and fulfill the um neighborhood plan vision for the shopping center.

4:33

Now briefly going over like the existing zoning.

4:37

Um kind of brief context here.

4:42

This zoning has been largely in place since we annexed this area back in 1988.

4:50

Um aside from the most recent development of I believe the Starbucks right there, uh was developed a couple years ago.

5:00

The rest of the development really hasn't been developed since 1980, with developments going back even further than that.

5:07

I believe the Tech City Bowl was last developed in 19.

5:12

It was developed in 1957 or something to that.

5:15

Uh the zoning itself kind of reflects the the kind the kind of development that we have out there.

5:24

Um it has it does allow for mixed use uh development.

5:31

It does not allow for residential uses to be on the ground floor.

5:37

Um it sets a commercial height uh that's typical at 13 13 feet, but limits the overall development, uh height of the development to 30 feet, requires 20 foot required yards around uh buffering it, uh buffering it from other uses around other uh zones, um, and then uh sets in place at 80% lock coverage, uh, which doesn't really kind of align with some of the regulations that want to orient existing regulations to orient uh towards uh arterial streets and and such.

6:21

So the set between the setbacks and the and the requirement and the lock coverage, it's makes it hard for the redevelopment and the height limit to re to redevelop under current conditions.

6:33

So we kind of dug into this over the last four meetings.

6:39

Um we've had several meetings uh on these topic areas.

6:45

I will not go into all the topic areas.

6:47

The underlying topic areas I'll just kind of highlight for you tonight and give a presentation on.

6:54

Um it also included the items on the uh the right, which are not underlined, which um are we can take we can cover um uh later in the in the meeting if you have further questions or comments on on those topics.

7:14

But primarily the the these underlying uh issues were uh these topics were the the issues that we needed to tackle and have much and great discussion on.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural███████████████████████████27%
Planning And Zoning██████████████14%
Affordable Housing████████████12%
Urban Planning████████8%
Design Review████████8%
Grocery Stores███████7%
Community Engagement█████5%
Public Engagement███3%
Building And Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Meeting - February 10, 2022: Bridle Trails Neighborhood Center CAR Public Hearing

The Kirkland Planning Commission met on February 10, 2022, from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM in the Council Chamber. The sole substantive item was a public hearing and recommendation on the Bridle Trails Neighborhood Center Community-Initiated Amendment Request (CAR File No. CAM20-00674) for the BCX zone, involving the TechCity Bowl/Totem Bowl and ROIC shopping center sites. The Commission heard staff and applicant presentations, received public testimony, deliberated by topic, and voted to forward a revised staff recommendation to the City Council.

Public Hearing

  • Senior Planner Scott Guter presented the BT-7 policy background and the proposed zoning amendments, including building height, required yards/setbacks, upper-story step-backs, uses, parking, pedestrian/vehicle access, public amenities, and design guidelines. He entered zoning-code clarifications into the record.
  • Deputy Planning Director Jeremy McMahan joined Guter in responding to commissioner questions.
  • Applicant Don Wells, representing Totem Bowl Investment/TechCity Bowl ownership, reviewed more than three years of community outreach and said the proposal adds middle-market housing, some affordable housing, and neighborhood services while remaining economically feasible.
  • Amanda Keating (Weber Thompson) and Jessie Clawson (McCullough Hill Leary) also presented. Clawson submitted a late letter after the 4:00 p.m. deadline proposing an amendment to clarify that through-block pathways should not require 80% commercial frontage.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Before the hearing, the Chair noted the Commission has no jurisdiction over the La Quinta Inn purchase and directed such comments to the City Council or King County; no separate audience comments were offered.
  • Terry Collier (Kirkland resident) spoke in support, citing well-designed apartments, retail, and bicycle/pedestrian connections, and asked the Commission to recommend adoption.
  • Laurie Fulton (Bridle View resident) requested that the development be treated the same as other residential-adjacent developments regarding setbacks; she disputed the staff report's statement that residential uses on 132nd are well buffered.
  • Carmen Andonian (Kirkland resident) spoke in support, citing meaningful amenities and asking for recommendation to City Council.
  • Janka Hobbs (Bridle View resident) expressed concern about the lack of setback along 132nd, building height, lighting, and said bus service was not ample.
  • Kurt Dresner (Kirkland resident) supported the proposal, including targeted density and right-sized parking.
  • Jeremy Eckert, counsel for ROIC, stated ROIC supports staff's clarifications and the proposal moving forward; he was available for questions.
  • Don Prince (Bridle View resident) argued the city overreached by adopting BT-7 despite neighborhood opposition, challenged the height and mass, and called the grocery requirement a "bait and switch" if watered down.
  • Shannon Abrams (Kirkland resident) supported the proposal as a way to add housing options, retail, and pedestrian improvements, and asked the Commission to recommend it.
  • Dana Kapella (Overlake Farms, south of the center) requested that the city mandate stormwater vaults on each development because the site has contributed to flooding since 1980.

Discussion Items

  • Grocery Store: Commissioners debated the minimum size and staff discretion. An earlier motion for 18,000 square feet and no staff discretion was withdrawn, as was an amendment to 15,000 square feet. The final direction was a 15,000-square-foot minimum, use of "full service grocery store," staff to define that term before City Council submittal, and no staff discretion to change the requirement.
  • Parking: Accepted staff's recommendation, including treating restaurants and taverns like other retail uses and removing the 15% parking buffer when a parking study is used.
  • Landscaping: Directed staff to add design guidance for additional vegetation along the west side of 132nd Avenue to provide visibility buffering from adjacent residential neighborhoods.
  • Maximum Building Height, Required Yards, and Upper-Story Step-Backs: Accepted staff recommendations; the proposed height remains within BT-7's five-story vision, with a 60-foot limit and a 40-foot step-back along the 70th slope.
  • Uses and Through-Block Pathways: Approved design guideline language stating consideration should be made to maximize commercial and public activations on through-block pathways. The applicant's late written proposal was discussed, but no separate vote was taken on that redline.
  • Pedestrian/Vehicle Access, Public Amenities, Design Guidelines, Affordable Housing (including 10% inclusionary zoning), Green Building Standards, Lot Coverage, and Building Modulation: Accepted staff recommendations. Lot coverage discussion acknowledged that stormwater must be handled on site under current and updated regulations.
  • Signs: Approved adding general language that signage should not be disruptive to adjoining residential neighborhoods.

Key Outcomes

  • Opened and closed the public hearing by unanimous 7-0 votes.
  • Grocery store motion carried 6-1; Commissioner Rutherford was the sole no vote.
  • Landscaping motion carried 7-0.
  • Through-block pathway activation motion carried 7-0.
  • Signage motion carried 7-0.
  • Final motion to recommend the February 10, 2022 afternoon staff packet, including the evening's approved amendments, carried 7-0.
  • Staff will define "full service grocery store" before the item goes to the City Council; the Chair and Vice Chair will review the definition.
  • There was no report on City Council actions or the public meeting calendar. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 PM.

Meeting Transcript

We're going to have three speakers for and three speakers against if we have that many. So I think we shall start um with the public comment. And this is specifically not for the public hearing. This is for anything unrelated to bridal trails. And then we will get to the public hearing piece. So it appears we do not have anyone here to speak about anything separately. Anyone? No. Okay. It appears we are just here to talk about bridal trails. So with that, I think it is time to open the public hearing. We need to make a motion. Second. Yep. Motion to all in favor. Okay. All right. And with that, the uh public hearing is open. Scott, did you want to present first and then we will have comments or would do we want to start with? Yes. Yeah, let's let me start off with the presentation. Uh that could be followed by a yeah, so that if anyone has any questions and you can answer them first, then yeah, and then um yeah, also this could be followed by a presentation by the applicant. Okay. Yep. Okay. So everyone in the audience, if you are here to speak, um hang on to your questions. Hopefully, um Scott and the applicant can maybe answer some of them, and then we will take comment directly after those two presentations before we begin our deliberation. Well, let me start to share my screen. Uh share screen one. Share. All right. So everyone see the screen. Yes. All right, good. Well, um, welcome uh commissioners to um this uh public hearing uh related to the bridal trails neighborhood center uh community initiated amendment request. Um just as a brief agenda for tonight's meeting, uh you'll receive a presentation by staff, you know, followed you know by you know some questions, as we said, you know, and a presentation by um the applicant in this order, and then conduct a public hearing to receive the uh public comments, and then after receiving public comments, you will be deliberating on a recommendation to the city council. So as everyone here knows, and most definitely everyone in the audience probably knows that the that this uh policy was developed um back in 2018 um throughout that year. Uh senior uh senior planning staff had uh engaged the uh neighborhood um with a neighborhood plan update in which the policy BT7, which we're gonna discuss tonight, had been um created um with some heavy public input. Uh the policy is to encourage redevelopment uh with thoughtful design of the shopping center and uh with increased development capacity, additional performance standards would be adhered to. Um this is the applicant's request. They are requesting to uh make a zoning text amendment to um help uh develop a design program, development standards, and design guidelines consistent with this policy. Um meet the and fulfill the um neighborhood plan vision for the shopping center. Now briefly going over like the existing zoning. Um kind of brief context here. This zoning has been largely in place since we annexed this area back in 1988. Um aside from the most recent development of I believe the Starbucks right there, uh was developed a couple years ago. The rest of the development really hasn't been developed since 1980, with developments going back even further than that. I believe the Tech City Bowl was last developed in 19. It was developed in 1957 or something to that. Uh the zoning itself kind of reflects the the kind the kind of development that we have out there.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com