Kirkland Planning Commission and Houghton Community Council Joint Hearing on High Performance Building Standards – February 24, 2022
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Kirkland Planning Commission and Houghton Community Council Joint Hearing on High Performance Building Standards – February 24, 2022
The Kirkland Planning Commission (PC) and Houghton Community Council (HCC) held a joint public hearing on Thursday, February 24, 2022, from 7:00 PM to 8:39 PM in the Council Chamber on File No. CAM22-00046, the proposed High Performance Buildings Standards Zoning Code Amendments, applied citywide. Staff presented the proposal, the public testified, and both bodies unanimously recommended approval to the Kirkland City Council. All voting members were present except Sandeep Singhal (PC) and Kristin Lovelady-Dickson (HCC).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Gina Clark, Master Builders Association (MBA), testified before the staff presentation and referred to written comments submitted that day. She thanked staff, stated MBA supports the proposed code amendments, and identified elements MBA would like amended. She noted an internal split among MBA members on building electrification and asked that any future expansion to single-family or broader housing types be revisited separately. On electric vehicle (EV) parking, she said the 100% EV-ready requirement might be too restrictive and overreaching, and she later clarified MBA is not asking to oppose the standards but would provide recommendations on percentage-based EV-ready spaces, conduit/wiring definitions, solar panel readiness, and drought-tolerant landscaping.
- Kevin Jones asked whether King County could address the proposal to purchase the La Quinta Inn for a homeless shelter in Houghton. PC Chair Angela Rozmyn stated that question was outside the board's purview and directed him to King County or the City Council.
- Sarah Richards, a Kirkland resident and member of People for Climate Action Kirkland's Steering Committee speaking as an individual, expressed support for the High Performance Building Standards Zoning Code Amendment. She said buildings represent 50% of Kirkland's greenhouse gas pollution and that the largest new developments should be 100% electric to reduce fossil fuel use, citing Washington's Climate Commitment Act and expected PSE grid decarbonization.
Staff Presentation and Discussion
- Senior Planner David Barnes presented the amendments. Deputy Planning Director Jeremy McMahan requested that the presentation occur before further public comment.
- Policy direction comes from the Sustainability Master Plan adopted in December 2020 and from Comprehensive Plan policies on incentivized high-performing, charger-ready buildings.
- The proposal would consolidate high performance building requirements into one zoning code chapter (115) and apply them to council-approved major developments seeking additional height, density, or other allowances, as well as to zones that already require green building standards. Staff clarified that the standards are not intended to apply to single-family homes or as-of-right smaller projects.
- Accepted certifications would include ILFI, Built Green, USGBC/LEED, or comparable programs. Additional performance standards include attaining maximum or bonus density, embodied carbon assessments, EV charger-ready parking (conduit and wiring rather than installed chargers), electrical outlets in bicycle storage areas, deconstruction and material diversion plans, at least 20% water use reduction beyond code, and all-electric buildings with a commercial cooking exception. The earlier net-zero energy requirement was replaced with an all-electric requirement to preserve flexibility for rooftop amenities and green roofs.
- Staff addressed the MBA/Built Green comment letter, including clarification of where the code applies, incentives to offset costs, electrification outreach, EV-ready requirements, solar flexibility, and the city's planned expedited green building program launching in spring 2022 with 50% faster review for certified buildings.
Deliberation
- HCC and PC members generally supported the amendments and discussed refinements. Commissioner Rodney Rutherford supported the conduit-only EV-ready definition and raised questions about e-bike outlet security, circuit capacity, outlet distance, and accessible parking for heavy e-bikes. Commissioner Katya Allen supported bike parking requirements for heavy/cargo bikes and suggested some percentage of EV spaces be more than conduit-ready. Commissioner Carter Bagg cautioned against setting low EV percentages because demand for chargers may grow rapidly.
- HCC Vice Chair John Kappler asked about guaranteed timelines, a single plan review pass, and not delaying the regular permit queue; staff clarified those are administrative aspects of the expedited program, not part of this zoning code amendment. Kappler also asked why equity language was included; staff said Built Green's new certification checklist includes equity and social justice prerequisites. One commissioner requested a clearer definition of equity in the code text.
- Commissioner Katya Allen noted a city document showing 1,755 residential units under construction with only 80 affordable units, below the 10% requirement, and asked how sustainability and affordability should be balanced. Commissioner Ruth Wright asked whether the standards were voluntary; staff confirmed they apply when large projects request approval beyond what code allows.
Key Outcomes
- The HCC voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the High Performance Buildings Standards Zoning Code Amendment as presented. The motion was made by Betsy Pringle and seconded by Larry Toedtli. Voting yes: Rick Whitney, John Kappler, Bill Goggins, Betsy Pringle, Larry Toedtli, and Ruth Wright.
- The PC voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the High Performance Buildings Standards Zoning Code Amendments as proposed by staff. The motion was made by Carter Bagg and seconded by John Tymczyszyn. Voting yes: Angela Rozmyn, Scott Reusser, John Tymczyszyn, Carter Bagg, Rodney Rutherford, and Katya Allen.
- The public hearing closed at 8:10 PM. No further comments from the audience were offered, and the meeting adjourned at 8:39 PM. Staff will take the joint recommendation and any drafting refinements to the Kirkland City Council.
Meeting Transcript
And the Houghton Community Council. And is that David Barnes, I presume. Yes. Awesome. So I think we're ready to get started. I don't believe we have anyone wishing to speak unless a couple other. Oh, we do have a hand raised after all. Lily Belleck. Sorry, all. This is Gina Clark with apparently I'm signed in on my daughter's student account for high school. So as much as I would love to be 17 again in some ways. Thanks so much, Chair Rosman for and plan commissioners and Chair Whitney and the Houghton Community Council for letting us address this issue tonight. Gina Clark, Master Builders, 335-116th Avenue Southeast in Bellevue. We just have a few comments tonight. Our first is actually to thank staff. They worked really hard on all of these code amendments, and I know that they have a fantastic plan to work on additional incentives moving forward this year. Last year they were very open and candid with us about what was going on with this and included our built green team quite frequently in a lot of the discussions. So I wanted to thank David and Scott in particular for all of their hard work. Easy bar for folks to meet with the incentives that are out there for third-party certifiers. So would just bring your attention to the things we agree with first, obviously. And just investing in investing in that kind of infrastructure that we hope that will take cars off the road, even EV cars, that this may be something that is a little too restrictive and overreaching. So that is the one thing today that I'd bring to your attention that we would like to maybe see some amendments on. The electrification of buildings, we have a little bit of an internal conflict with our members being split at Master Builders on this. Right now, Master Builders will support the proposed amendments and this code. But if it does um move forward to a broader extension of housing types or what or single family, if we could revisit that issue separately, that would be fantastic. Other than that, I'm here to answer any questions and just thank all of you for your work and consideration. Thanks, Gina. Do we have anyone else who oh John? Thank you. I do have a couple of questions for uh Gina Clark, if you are still there, Gina. So in hi, how are you tonight? I'm okay. Thank you for asking. I hope you're well. Can I would you mind if I interject for a moment, uh, Chair's Osman and the um I think if if you've opened, I'm not sure if we've opened the public hearing yet. So that Gina was speaking items from the audience, but I would say No, no, we had opened the public hearing. So David has a presentation for the um council and commission if you'd be interested in that before you head into the QA and public testimony. Okay. Could I say one thing too, really quick? Um, I also uh thought that the speakers were gonna happen after the presentation, because that's what happened last time. So I have somebody that's gonna do that, but now it it seems like it's I don't know if if we could do both. I don't know. I don't know how that this works. I just perhaps stick around and answer questions afterwards. Yeah, I think Gina, you'll be here for the meeting. Yes. Okay, great. Thank you, Gina. All right. Of course, thanks, Kevin.
openpublica.com