The Kirkland Planning Commission met on August 25, 2022, at 7:16 PM in the Council Chamber, adjourning at 9:35 PM. The meeting included a study session on Missing Middle Housing implementation, a public hearing on Houghton Community Council sunsetting amendments, and administrative reports. Commissioners voted to approve zoning code amendments for the Houghton area and to pursue hybrid meetings.
Missing Middle Housing Implementation Status Senior Planner Scott Guter presented an update on missing middle housing (MMH) code amendments adopted in 2020. He highlighted an uptick in permits for duplexes, triplexes, cottages, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) since adoption. He introduced the city's new housing dashboard, which shows trends by neighborhood. Discussion included the slower pace of MMH development in the former Houghton area (only one cottage project, under appeal) versus the rest of the city. Commissioners raised questions about permit costs, the pre-approved ADU program (launching next month), and challenges such as fire separation requirements and driveway standards. Several commissioners expressed a desire to survey applicants who abandoned the permit process to identify barriers. Staff agreed to bring another update in six months.
Houghton Community Council Sunsetting Amendments (File No. CAM22-00322) Planning Supervisor Nick Cilluffo presented the proposed zoning code amendments to remove references to the defunct Houghton Community Council and synchronize regulations citywide as required by state law (HB 1769). The amendments cover procedural changes and regulatory differences including floor area ratio, garage design, tree regulations, affordable housing, and missing middle housing. Staff recommended a delayed effective date of January 1, 2023, to allow projects to vest. Commissioners debated whether the Planning Commission had meaningful input since the City Council had already expressed desire for consistency. Public testimony from John Kappler argued that the differences were based on neighborhood character and that no study justified the changes. Commissioner Tymczyszyn recused himself as a Houghton resident. After deliberation, the Commission voted on the amendments.
Administrative Reports & Commission Discussion Deputy Director Allison Zike reported that the City Council passed a tenant protections ordinance on August 3, effective September 17, requiring notice for rent increases and capping security deposits. She advised that the Chair and Vice Chair would discuss communication with the Mayor and Deputy Mayor regarding the Station Area Plan (Phase 2) at their quarterly meeting. Commissioners expressed frustration about lack of information and perceived bypassing during Phase 1. They agreed to have the Chair and Vice Chair raise these concerns prior to Phase 2.
In-Person/Hybrid Meetings Commissioners discussed returning to hybrid meetings, noting that virtual-only formats have reduced public attendance and engagement. They emphasized the importance of allowing remote participation for accessibility while resuming in-person hearings, especially for the upcoming Station Area Plan. A motion was made to direct staff to begin hybrid meetings immediately, provide a status update at every meeting, and communicate this to the City Council and City Manager. The motion passed 6-0.
Recording in progress. And now if we have any comments from the audience not related to the public hearing. So unrelated to Houghton. Seeing none. Oh, sorry. Margaret Bull, if this is unrelated to Houghton. Okay. Can you hear me now? Yes. Okay. Um this is a general comment about some of the development in the sorry in the whole area. Um I have a granddaughter going to elementary school now. And she lives in a very urban area in Redmond. And she's not allowed to go to the local school. Um, which is more or less within walking distance. She has to be busted all the way up education hill to a school that's quite far away. And not only is that school far away, the transit bus does not serve that area very well. It only goes one way in a loop, and you have to walk quite a ways from the bus stop up a hill. And you know that's not that great for a five-year-old. And so, you know, if she misses the bus, if something else happens, there's no way for her to easily get to school or for someone to pick her up from school because the transit bus is inadequate and walking, it's quite difficult walking up education hill. So um I just want generally, as the planning commission is trying to make everything more dense or supporting this idea that we're going to become more dense. If the school district has no plans for any new schools, it takes years and years to plan a new school. So if the city's selling property for a new school or something else is coming up, you know, I can see intense urban development. But if there's no place for the children to go to school and they have to be bussed long distances, that's a big problem, especially if we're encouraging people not to own a car who live in an inner city area or who live in Houghton or wherever they live, you know, without a car, it is pretty difficult to get your kid from school when they're being busted quite a ways. And the whole thing about being bussed is there was a lot of problems with that back in the day when we were busting for um integration, and a lot of the kids were being bussed out of their neighborhoods, and it was a real problem, you know. They couldn't play with the neighborhood kids. So I want you to keep thinking about this as you go over these development plans because I think maybe we have to have statistics on what we think how many kids are going to be coming to our neighborhoods or our urban areas. You know, without a statistic there, of course you can't decide. Well, maybe it's just single people moving. I don't know. But three of my neighbors have three kids. I don't know how they ended up with three kids, but um some of my other neighbors have no kids, but we kind of have to have a demographic idea before um we can make some of these development decisions. That's all I have to say at the moment. Thank you, Margaret. Do we have anyone else who wishes to speak about general city topics before we open the public hearing? Seeing none, I would like to now open the public hearing and or no, sorry, we have the study session first on yes, okay. Yeah, okay. Sorry. Missing middle housing first uh update, which I believe is that Scott. Yeah. Yes. Yeah. I I had the two. Thanks. Thanks for putting me first. Yeah. Yep. Thanks. I looked at my agenda and was like, oops, that's the other way around. So carry on.