OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session on NE 85th Station Area Plan Phase 2 – October 13, 2022

Planning CommissionThursday, October 13, 2022
BodyKirkland, Washington
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, October 13, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:06

Okay, thanks.

1:08

Okay, we're live.

1:11

Thank you.

1:12

Could you call roll, please?

1:15

Alan?

1:16

Yes.

1:17

Bria Heisher.

1:18

Yeah.

1:19

Scott Ricer.

1:21

Here.

1:22

Angela Rosman.

1:23

Here.

1:26

Here.

1:26

Sandy Single.

1:28

Here.

1:29

And John Tim Chison.

1:31

Here.

1:32

Thanks.

1:33

Okay, tonight we've got the uh stationary plan form-based code focus for phase two of the stationary plan.

1:43

And then after that, we will be talking about policies and procedures as we prep to go to hybrid in-person next meeting.

1:53

And with that, I am going to take public comment.

1:57

So if anyone um would like to comment, this would be your time.

2:06

Uh that Chris Kagan.

2:26

There we go.

2:27

I just wanted to say um, Adam, your kid is adorable, and I love that as a great way to start a meeting.

2:34

I'm done.

2:39

Do we have anyone else who would like to make uh Yin Liu?

2:54

You have three minutes to get on.

3:11

Oh we have them on now, yeah.

3:18

Go ahead.

3:19

Hi, this is Enid.

3:24

Hi, uh I uh actually like uh I'm uh I I think I send you guys the email before this meeting about some like comments we have uh for this phase two.

3:34

We live in uh uh the highland in Kirkland community right next to your neighborhood makes it use the sixty-five uh feet height zone.

3:44

So we have concern about the setbacks.

3:46

I think from the information I know is the setbacks only five feet for um from our community, though which is all residential.

3:54

So I'm not sure like is it possible that we can address this problem or questions and uh we can't keep the current setback.

4:03

I think there's current, I think it's around like twenty, twenty-five feet.

4:08

So I think we'd like to talk about this, and also like we have concern that sixty-five feet tall building right next to our twenty feet tall small houses that looks not very pleasant.

4:28

That's everything uh commissioner Tim Chisholm.

4:31

You have a question for that?

4:34

Uh generally we've stopped asking people what their address is, but you know, for some specific comments, it might be helpful to have that so we can take a look and have a better understanding of what she's talking about.

4:48

Yes, our like our community is uh let me give you my address.

4:53

You can just google it.

4:54

That's all should be fine.

4:56

So my address is eighty-eight one four twenty-third lane northeast.

5:04

So it is on the one 20s 124 street and 85.

5:12

I think that is where it is.

5:14

Yes.

5:16

Um, I will look at it and um my email address is on the um city website.

5:24

Sure, thank you.

5:26

Thank you.

5:28

Do we have anyone else who wishes to speak tonight?

5:35

Seeing none, I am going to ask that we get started with the study session tonight.

5:42

Thanks, Chair Rosman.

5:44

I'm gonna get us started tonight.

5:46

Uh, good evening, everyone.

5:48

Um with us tonight, we have our city staff team.

5:52

Um, Scott, who you got uh at least an intro to on this project last time, Adam's here to help us out tonight, and then we also have our consultant team from Mathune back with us tonight.

6:02

Um, so we have Brad Barnett and Sandra Gergis joining us tonight to help walk through uh the form-based code.

6:09

So Sandra's gonna share her screen, and we can go ahead and move to that third slide if you don't mind.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████33%
Planning And Zoning████████████████████20%
Public Engagement███████████████15%
Parking Management███████7%
Parks and Recreation███████7%
Urban Planning████4%
Zoning Regulations████4%
Public Transportation███3%
Transportation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session on NE 85th Station Area Plan Phase 2 – October 13, 2022

The Kirkland Planning Commission held a study session on October 13, 2022, from 7:01 PM to 9:42 PM, focusing on Phase 2 of the NE 85th Street Station Area Plan. Key discussion topics included form-based code standards (transition policies, neighborhood mixed-use and urban flex districts, and parking rates) and amendments to the Planning Commission’s policies and procedures to support hybrid meetings. No formal decisions were made on the Station Area Plan; the commission provided feedback for further refinement. The commission did vote unanimously (7-0) to approve revised policies and procedures, with a final version to be reviewed and adopted at the next meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Chris Kagen, a Kirkland resident, made a brief, non-substantive comment about staff member Adam Weinstein’s child.
  • Yin Lu, a Kirkland resident of the Highland neighborhood, expressed concerns on behalf of Highland residents about the proposed 5-foot setback from their residential community (currently 20–25 feet) and the potential for 65-foot tall buildings abutting their 20-foot tall houses. She requested that the current setback be maintained and asked for further discussion.

Discussion Items

  • NE 85th Street Station Area Plan – Phase 2 Form-Based Code

    • Staff and consultants (Mithun) presented updates on form-based code components, including transition policies, neighborhood mixed-use district standards, urban flex district standards, and recommended parking rates.
    • Transitions: Commissioners raised concerns about the adequacy of the 15-foot setback and 25-degree sky exposure plane, especially where height differences exceed 30 feet. Some called for more aggressive transition strategies for larger height disparities (e.g., 85–150 feet adjacent to 30-foot zones) and requested analysis of topographic variations that could affect perceived building height. Staff agreed to bring back refined options.
    • Neighborhood Mixed-Use District: Commissioners discussed specific parcel heights (e.g., 75-foot zone at the former PETCO site) and expressed concern about 85-foot zoning adjacent to low-density residential neighborhoods without adequate buffering. Some supported preserving the existing height at the top of Rose Hill (124th–128th) and urged caution around the Cross Kirkland Corridor (CKC), favoring 30-foot limits there. Staff noted that transition strategies and incentive zoning could temper actual built heights.
    • Urban Flex District: Commissioners emphasized preserving light industrial and manufacturing uses, as directed by City Council. Vice Chair Reusser strongly discouraged ground-floor residential to maintain walkability and retail activity. Commissioner Heiser highlighted the need to retain public works maintenance space within the district.
    • Parking Rates: Staff recommended reduced parking minimums (e.g., 0.5 stalls per unit for residential, 1 stall per 1,000 sq ft for commercial). Several commissioners advocated for even lower minimums or zero parking requirements, citing climate and affordability goals. Others urged caution about convenience, disabled access, ride-share staging, and EV readiness. Commissioner Singhal proposed that 100% of new parking be EV-ready. Commissioner Tymczyszyn suggested forming a parking subcommittee to avoid lengthy debate. Staff noted that bike parking requirements have been increased and decoupled from vehicle parking.
  • Planning Commission Policies and Procedures

    • Deputy Director Allison Zike presented draft amendments to enable hybrid meetings, based on City Council’s framework.
    • Commissioners discussed language around attendance expectations. Chair Rozmyn requested explicit recognition of health concerns and comfort levels, including public or personal health reasons, to avoid pressuring commissioners to attend in person. The commission agreed to remove the phrase “from time to time” and add “public or personal health concerns” and “including telephone connections” to the attendance clause.
    • Commissioner Singhal proposed that the commission explicitly encourage public participation both in person and virtually, and that this message be added to the commission’s webpage. The commission concurred.
    • A motion was made and carried 7-0 to approve the amendments as edited, with final language to be presented for formal approval at the October 27 meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Approval of Policies and Procedures Amendments (7-0): The commission voted to adopt the revised policies and procedures as amended during the discussion. A final version (including the “public or personal health concerns” and “including telephone connections” additions) will be brought to the October 27 meeting for signature and formal adoption.
  • Approval of Meeting Minutes (7-0): The minutes from June 14, 2022, and July 28, 2022, were approved unanimously.
  • Next Steps for Station Area Plan: Staff will refine transition policies (including topographic considerations and more aggressive options for large height differences), study parking standards, and present updated form-based code topics at the October 27 meeting. A community open house is scheduled for October 24. Staff will also engage with developers (including NAIOP) to gather feedback.
  • Future Agenda: The October 27 meeting will include further discussion on the Station Area form-based code, approval of the final policies and procedures, and a public hearing on Comprehensive Plan amendments (annual updates, park rezones, and language updates).

Meeting Transcript

Okay, thanks. Okay, we're live. Thank you. Could you call roll, please? Alan? Yes. Bria Heisher. Yeah. Scott Ricer. Here. Angela Rosman. Here. Here. Sandy Single. Here. And John Tim Chison. Here. Thanks. Okay, tonight we've got the uh stationary plan form-based code focus for phase two of the stationary plan. And then after that, we will be talking about policies and procedures as we prep to go to hybrid in-person next meeting. And with that, I am going to take public comment. So if anyone um would like to comment, this would be your time. Uh that Chris Kagan. There we go. I just wanted to say um, Adam, your kid is adorable, and I love that as a great way to start a meeting. I'm done. Do we have anyone else who would like to make uh Yin Liu? You have three minutes to get on. Oh we have them on now, yeah. Go ahead. Hi, this is Enid. Hi, uh I uh actually like uh I'm uh I I think I send you guys the email before this meeting about some like comments we have uh for this phase two. We live in uh uh the highland in Kirkland community right next to your neighborhood makes it use the sixty-five uh feet height zone. So we have concern about the setbacks. I think from the information I know is the setbacks only five feet for um from our community, though which is all residential. So I'm not sure like is it possible that we can address this problem or questions and uh we can't keep the current setback. I think there's current, I think it's around like twenty, twenty-five feet. So I think we'd like to talk about this, and also like we have concern that sixty-five feet tall building right next to our twenty feet tall small houses that looks not very pleasant. That's everything uh commissioner Tim Chisholm. You have a question for that? Uh generally we've stopped asking people what their address is, but you know, for some specific comments, it might be helpful to have that so we can take a look and have a better understanding of what she's talking about. Yes, our like our community is uh let me give you my address. You can just google it. That's all should be fine. So my address is eighty-eight one four twenty-third lane northeast. So it is on the one 20s 124 street and 85. I think that is where it is. Yes. Um, I will look at it and um my email address is on the um city website. Sure, thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com