Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session: Housing Element Policy Briefing - February 22, 2024
Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session: Housing Element Policy Briefing - February 22, 2024
The Kirkland Planning Commission held a study session on February 22, 2024, to review the Housing Element of the 2044 Comprehensive Plan. The session included a policy briefing by staff, followed by commission discussion, approval of previous meeting minutes, and administrative updates. Six commissioners were present, with one absent.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the minutes of November 9, 2023 and December 14, 2023 by a 6-0 vote.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Jessica Rowe, land use attorney with McCullough Hill, representing Carl Peterson (owner of the Michaels site), expressed general support for the draft housing policies, particularly those related to parking reduction. She thanked the commission and staff for considering the Michaels site as one of four locations for potential new housing.
Discussion Items
- 2044 Comprehensive Plan - Housing Element Policy Briefing #1: Senior Planner Scott Guter and Deputy Director Allison Zike presented background on housing needs, including regional housing projections, Kirkland's housing allocation breakdown, cost-burden data by race and income, survey results, and potential land use changes to add capacity. The presentation highlighted that nearly 80% of allocated housing is likely to be apartments serving lower income levels.
- The commission reviewed a set of draft supply-side goals and policies (H1D through H1P). Key topics of discussion included:
- Reducing the cost of building housing by modifying development regulations, streamlining permitting, and considering SEPA exemptions for infill.
- Policies to support permanent supportive housing and unhoused populations.
- Reducing minimum lot sizes, setbacks, and parking requirements near transit.
- Allowing single-exit stairways in buildings up to six stories and increasing family-sized units.
- Adjusting modulation and articulation standards in urban centers to reduce costs.
- Commissioners raised concerns about focusing capacity only along transit corridors, recommending consideration of walkable amenities and parks. Some commissioners cautioned against citywide minimum intensity requirements, citing potential legal issues and impacts on existing neighborhoods.
- Staff noted that the environmental analysis will cover a broad range of capacity to allow future flexibility.
Key Outcomes
- The planning work program was approved by City Council, including a new state-mandated impact fee study.
- Council directed staff to prepare a legislative review memo on options for increasing school capacity by enabling housing production on school sites, to be presented in March.
- Council adopted a six-month moratorium on new dwelling units on Goat Hill to study environmental issues; this was added to the commission's work program.
- A parking study presented to City Council will be shared with the commission; additional presentations may be scheduled.
- The commission provided direction to refine several housing policies for the second briefing on March 28, 2024.
- The next meeting on March 14, 2024 will include economic development and transportation policy briefings, plus the 2024 miscellaneous code amendments.
- The meeting adjourned at 9:21 PM.
Meeting Transcript
I think we'll get started. And I think we'll begin with roll call. Gotcha, Alan. Present. Ria Heiser. Here. Aaron Jacobson. Here. Racer. Here. Angela Rosman. Here. Rodney Rutherford. Here. Sandeep single. Great. So before we get our meeting started, is there anybody either in our audience or online that would like to speak? And if so, come up to the microphone. I don't think we have any items from the audience today, Chair Racer. Great. Okay, for tonight's agenda. We will continue our study session on the 2044 comprehensive plan. Tonight we'll be looking at the housing element and have a policy briefing. Great. Thank you, Chair Ricer. And so before we get into the briefing, just wanted to give an overview to the commission. This is going to follow the same format as your previous comp plan policy briefings. So Scott's gonna give you some background and a little more background on housing than we've provided for the other elements because this one this one is a big one. Um and there's a lot of important kind of regional context that we want to make sure we're talking about a little bit. Um and then when we get to the policy discussion, um, we do have those highlighted policies from your packet that we're gonna go through individually. We want to make sure we get your feedback on those, and then we'll open it up for um any guidance or feedback the commission has on items that we didn't necessarily highlight. So with that, I will hand it over to Scott for your briefing. Um wow. I'm not gonna beef at you here. Okay. So um, yeah, tonight we're going to talk about housing, which I'm pretty sure all of you are s really excited to dig into. Um so um there we go. Um so the agenda for tonight is to kind of go through a little bit of background as um as Alison has uh uh said, and then we'll uh dive into some more uh a deeper dive into the local input that we've that we've uh received through our community engagement. Um and then prior to kind of digging into the um the actual policies, the goal policies that we're gonna be looking at tonight. Um we're gonna kind of talk about the kind of a regional context that we're in um and um things to consider as you're uh can you know as you're looking at these uh draft goals and policies. And then I will end like always with you know the PC uh the planning commission questions that we posed in your packets and and take your feedback. So here we go on the background. So as a um as a reminder, the housing element uh is put in place to kind of guide the uh the housing growth for our city. Um it has to be framed in the countywide uh context, so like what the regional context is, you know, the economy uh that that surrounds us and the uh housing trends that um that our region is um is undertaking at this point in time. Um new legislation uh passed in 20 uh 2021. Uh we were encouraged to before, but now we're required to accommodate. So uh in the last briefing that I gave you, we um kind of showed a little bit of a breakdown of what that that housing need allocation is, and I'll go over that again tonight. It also is asking us to address you know the legacy of zoning, um, you know, like patterns of disinvestment that have occurred, um, if any, in certain areas of uh most of the areas of the city, just by the way, um I'm not gonna get into this much here, but most of the city doesn't have a lot of disinvestment. We have a we're pretty we're a pretty attractive place to have uh to grow and have housing. Uh but we are asked to identify uh displacement risk and um and prevent any future displacement as well.
openpublica.com