OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Kirkland, Washington/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session and Public Hearing - October 8, 2026

Planning Commission — Thursday, October 8, 2026
BodyKirkland, Washington
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, October 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:04:52

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:52

All

Speaker 1

0:52

right.

0:52

I will call this meeting of the planning commission to order.

0:55

We'll start with a roll call.

Speaker 2

0:56

Margaret Bunyall.

0:58

Here.

Unassigned speaker

0:58

And

Speaker 2

0:59

now Sheree Chaudry.

1:02

Aaron Jacobson.

1:03

Here.

1:03

Gina Medea.

Speaker 3

1:04

Here.

Speaker 2

1:05

Julia Nolan.

1:06

Here.

1:06

Scott Ricer.

Speaker 1

1:08

Here.

Speaker 2

1:09

Rodney Rutherford.

Speaker 1

1:10

Here.

1:12

All right.

1:13

Thank you.

1:13

Since we have a quorum, we'll continue on.

1:16

Um first is comments from the audience.

1:20

I see no one in person and no one on Zoom.

1:23

So I think we can just continue on.

1:27

Next we have special presentations, which there are none.

1:30

And uh I will pause here.

1:32

I think we've previously discussed um whether we want to have the order uh changed for public hearings if we want them up front.

1:39

Um seeing no one in the audience.

1:41

Um seeing no one in the audience.

1:45

Uh I don't think it matters that much whether we have the public hearing at the beginning or at the end.

1:50

Um so I think we'll just proceed as is, but uh I intend to have a break um after uh before the third item, so before the public hearing.

2:00

And with that, we'll get into the study session for the neighborhood stores and services code amendment project briefing.

Speaker 4

2:07

All right, thank you.

2:08

And then I'll note for the record that we have um Commissioner Chaudry joining the meeting.

2:13

Um so tonight, um this is your second study session for the neighborhood services and stores project.

2:21

Um hopefully you enjoyed reading through um a lot of the great work that um the team has done on community engagement, um, tried to present that in a way where it was kind of structured to answer a lot of the questions that we heard from the planning commission and city council so far.

2:38

Um tonight, Leandra is gonna be leading you through those policy questions that were in your packet.

2:44

Um ideally we'd be able to get some really specific feedback from the planning commission tonight that we can take back to our desks and start writing draft code with.

2:54

And so um we might we might push a little bit to get um some specifics from you if if we don't hear that and then um would appreciate um we might kind of ask to see if there's consensus on certain items or make sure we're kind of hearing what direction you want.

3:10

Um I will remind you though that you're not locking anything in tonight.

3:14

Um there will still be um maybe another study session and a public hearing, and so um specifics tonight that we're we're getting can still be adjusted down the road, but it's helpful to have something to draft that code with.

3:25

So with that, I will hand it over to Leandria to lead you through

Unassigned speaker

3:29

it.

Speaker 4

3:30

Great.

Speaker 5

3:31

Thank you.

3:32

Good evening, Chair, Vice Chair, and Commissioners.

3:42

Just as a reminder, this is a project to assess changes to our allowances for home occupations and to assess new allowances.

3:49

New potential allowances for uh neighborhood scale commercial services and uses

Speaker 6

4:02

okay.

Unassigned speaker

4:03

Uh

Speaker 5

4:03

our agenda is shown on screen.

4:05

We'll start with a review of the comments we received from uh past public meetings, both with the city council and the planning commission.

4:14

We have a few slides of information on the recent community engagement efforts that staff has undertaken.

4:20

And then the presentation will mainly focus on the four policy topics raised in the staff report.

4:26

We plan to review feedback re related to those four topics.

4:30

Um we'll raise some regulatory or technical considerations for the planning commission, and then the remaining um guidance that staff is seeking for each topic that will help steer those code amendments.

4:44

Hopping right in.

4:45

Um so when launching this project, we heard from the city council and an interest in keeping the scope of changes tightly aligned with the comprehensive plan policy language that supports this project.

5:06

Many council members also acknowledge the nuance required for this project, and some recommended various ways to that we might start slow and then add additional allowances for neighborhood commercial uses later on.

5:21

Ideas like a tiered approach, a pilot approach, or location-based approach to allowances were all floated in that meeting.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Home Occupation████████████████████████████28%
Zoning Regulations██████████████████18%
Procedural████████8%
Neighborhood Planning███████7%
State Requirements██████6%
Noise Abatement████4%
Animal Welfare████4%
Code Enforcement███3%
Sidewalk Improvements███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Kirkland Planning Commission Study Session and Public Hearing - October 8, 2026

The Kirkland Planning Commission met on October 8, 2026, for a study session on the Neighborhood Stores and Services Code Amendment Project, a briefing on state legislative compliance, a public hearing on miscellaneous code amendments, and approval of prior meeting minutes.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public offered testimony during the initial public comment period or during the public hearing on the miscellaneous code amendments.

Discussion Items

Study Session: Neighborhood Stores and Services Code Amendments

Staff presented findings from community engagement, including a survey and tabling events. Common themes included support for home occupations as a way to start businesses affordably and concerns about potential negative effects of more intense commercial uses.

  • Home Occupations: Commissioners broadly agreed to remove or revise regulations that are difficult to enforce, such as limits on deliveries and client visits, and instead apply the same non-observable standards as for residential uses. Observable criteria like outside storage, vehicles, and signage would be retained. Commissioner Bunyall noted enforcement challenges and that the 500-square-foot limit triggers commercial building code occupancy requirements. Commissioner Rutherford suggested allowing food trucks and focusing on externally observable criteria. Commissioner Nolan argued that if a rule cannot be enforced, it should not exist. Vice Chair Medea supported retaining limits on observable items. Chair Jacobson summarized consensus: treat home occupations like residential uses for non-observable impacts.

  • Neighborhood Serving Commercial: Commissioners addressed several policy questions:

    • Association with residential use: A majority favored requiring some residential use on the same site, with Commissioner Rutherford suggesting a 50% residential square footage threshold. Commissioner Ricer advised caution because of public hesitancy.
    • Maximum floor area: The commission generally supported 500 square feet as a baseline, with discussion of allowing up to 1,200 square feet for certain uses or locations. Commissioners Choudhry, Rutherford, and others supported the higher limit for businesses like bookstores if the house is large or if located on an arterial street.
    • Location allowances: Commissioners opposed restricting to corner lots or requiring sidewalks. Instead, they preferred basing location on street type (e.g., arterials vs. local streets). Chair Jacobson asked staff to return with options on size and location.
    • Standards to reduce vehicle trips: Commissioners endorsed limiting floor area, hours of operation (suggested 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.), counting outdoor space against square footage limits, and implementing loading/delivery standards. Commissioner Bunyall emphasized prioritizing walking and biking over car access.
    • Buffering: Some visual and noise buffering was considered necessary, but commissioners noted practical limitations of fences and landscaping.
    • Approval process: Commissioners strongly preferred a by-right approach with a clear list of permitted uses. Some suggested limited discretionary review for alcohol sales, firearms, and other high-impact uses. Chair Jacobson supported by-right and proposed prohibiting guns, marijuana, and tobacco. The commission did not reach consensus on alcohol sales vs. service.
  • Location and Access: Commissioners agreed that neighborhood commercial should not be limited to corners or areas with sidewalks, as such restrictions could exclude underserved neighborhoods. Commissioner Bunyall raised concerns about ADA accessibility for customers. Staff noted that 75% of Kirkland streets have sidewalks on at least one side and 86% of arterials/collectors do.

  • Next Steps: The discussion will continue at the October 22, 2026 meeting, where staff will present specific options on size, location, and use limitations.

State Compliance Presentation and Policy Decisions

Staff reviewed state legislation requiring or permitting local action. The commission provided guidance on three policy choices:

  • Family Burial Grounds (HB 2239): Commissioners unanimously supported staff's recommendation to disallow family burial grounds in Kirkland, citing complications for property disclosure, future development, and the urban context.
  • Child Care Centers (SB 5509): Noted as a state mandate requiring child care centers as an outright permitted use in all zones except industrial and open space by July 2027. The commission agreed that adult daycares should be treated as a separate use category.
  • Residential Uses in Commercial/Mixed-Use Zones (SB 6026): Commissioners expressed support for allowing residential uses in the one station area zone that currently prohibits housing (within the TIFF area). Chair Jacobson noted potential traffic reduction benefits. Staff will return with code amendments and conduct environmental review.

Public Hearing: Miscellaneous Code Amendments

Staff presented a package of minor code amendments, including definition clarifications, removal of obsolete zone references, updates to terms (e.g., replacing "alien" with "permanent resident card"), and technical revisions related to sewer connections and permit renewals. No public testimony was offered. Commissioner Nolan moved to recommend the amendments to city council as drafted; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously.

Approval of Minutes

Minutes from May 28 and June 25, 2026, were approved unanimously without correction.

Key Outcomes

  • Home Occupations: Consensus to simplify enforcement by aligning non-observable regulations with residential standards and retaining enforcement on observable criteria.
  • Neighborhood Commercial: Direction to staff to bring back options on size (500 sq ft baseline, up to 1,200 sq ft based on use/location), location (by street type), hours (8 a.m.–8 p.m.), by-right approval, and buffering. Continued to October 22, 2026.
  • Family Burial Grounds: Commission recommends prohibition; to be included in 2027 code amendments.
  • Child Care Centers: Mandate acknowledged; staff to draft code by 2027.
  • Residential in Station Area Zone: Support for allowing residential; staff to proceed with analysis.
  • Miscellaneous Code Amendments: Unanimously recommended to city council.
  • Minutes from May 28 and June 25, 2026: Approved unanimously.

Meeting Transcript

All right. I will call this meeting of the planning commission to order. We'll start with a roll call. Margaret Bunyall. Here. And now Sheree Chaudry. Aaron Jacobson. Here. Gina Medea. Here. Julia Nolan. Here. Scott Ricer. Here. Rodney Rutherford. Here. All right. Thank you. Since we have a quorum, we'll continue on. Um first is comments from the audience. I see no one in person and no one on Zoom. So I think we can just continue on. Next we have special presentations, which there are none. And uh I will pause here. I think we've previously discussed um whether we want to have the order uh changed for public hearings if we want them up front. Um seeing no one in the audience. Um seeing no one in the audience. Uh I don't think it matters that much whether we have the public hearing at the beginning or at the end. Um so I think we'll just proceed as is, but uh I intend to have a break um after uh before the third item, so before the public hearing. And with that, we'll get into the study session for the neighborhood stores and services code amendment project briefing. All right, thank you. And then I'll note for the record that we have um Commissioner Chaudry joining the meeting. Um so tonight, um this is your second study session for the neighborhood services and stores project. Um hopefully you enjoyed reading through um a lot of the great work that um the team has done on community engagement, um, tried to present that in a way where it was kind of structured to answer a lot of the questions that we heard from the planning commission and city council so far. Um tonight, Leandra is gonna be leading you through those policy questions that were in your packet. Um ideally we'd be able to get some really specific feedback from the planning commission tonight that we can take back to our desks and start writing draft code with. And so um we might we might push a little bit to get um some specifics from you if if we don't hear that and then um would appreciate um we might kind of ask to see if there's consensus on certain items or make sure we're kind of hearing what direction you want. Um I will remind you though that you're not locking anything in tonight. Um there will still be um maybe another study session and a public hearing, and so um specifics tonight that we're we're getting can still be adjusted down the road, but it's helpful to have something to draft that code with. So with that, I will hand it over to Leandria to lead you through it. Great. Thank you. Good evening, Chair, Vice Chair, and Commissioners. Just as a reminder, this is a project to assess changes to our allowances for home occupations and to assess new allowances. New potential allowances for uh neighborhood scale commercial services and uses okay. Uh

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com