Already I'll just gun through the go through these here.

Um we got the five things on the agenda.

If you want um we could do the designated historic and the similar use together or separate.

And then the two parking plan reviews, same property owner, adjacent homes, same applicant.

So we could probably hear those together.

Um the first one.

Okay, yeah, that's I know Sean's got a recuse himself from the first one.

So view on Detroit.

Mixed use overlay.

Um I don't think anyone on the commission was here in 2020 when this was approved last.

Um treating it, I mean, I'm I have been treating it as basically a new application, even though they are leaning heavily on, I mean, they basically, from what I understand, they basically the DGRIMO, the new developer just came in and took the plans from the last time, like the last approval, everything.

So there is there's history behind this, there's history of approval behind this.

Um just been working with them to get updated documents.

Nothing, nothing has changed uh in in the macro sense.

ABR is working through some material changes and things on the outside.

But it's been over 12 months.

Anytime at 12 months, the conditional use and overlay, if you haven't acted on it, it's it's void.

Um so mixed use, really the only reason again why it's coming here for mixed use is because they're proposing first floor residential.

It's one of those things that adds another step that probably shouldn't be a step, but that's that's zoning refresh uh stuff that we're working through.

But it is the old Spitzer um dealership site.

Uh so basically between Wyandotte, Parkwood, and then Bunts.

Um so Bruce's automotive hanging on the corner there at Bunts and Detroit.

He's nothing's changing about his property except he's gonna lose the overflow parking that he uses, which I don't think is his property.

So it's all C3, so same zoning district.

Um I'm gonna let them present their package.

They do have an I'm gonna ask them when they get here.

I assume they're gonna want to present the most up-to-date one that they just gave ABR.

Um it's a full, so we can be kind of selective and moving them through the just to really focus on the things that we need to focus on.

Um if you're all familiar with mixed use overlay, provide some flexibility with some regulations uh for predominantly commercial and residential.

Um has to have one or more of the following advantages.

Um I think the ones that a lot of these is just that achieving that first floor residential mixed use with with having some commercial um in there, pedestrian scale, proper buffers and transitions, especially in this area.

There's a little different residential one street, uh, Wyandotte has the typical like three-story Lakewood homes.

Parkwood has more of the two-story, it's like a it's almost like it was built at a totally different time.

Um it's all down to the for us, it's the development standards, so yard and setback requirements, height limitations, parking requirements, and if you want to discuss open space landscaping, it's in there.

Um we'll get into parking.

It's again, it's it's just like the same standards as Barry Buick, multifamily one space per dwelling unit, max of two per dwelling unit.

And most of the time with these mixed uses, the commercial spaces are under 2500 square feet anyways, they don't need any additional parking.

Um then like I would like to highlight on this for the setbacks, the heights, all of those things.

Just under mixed use overlay, the commission does have that latitude for a little bit of flexibility, although I will say they went with the the past kind of size and massing and everything, everything is within standards for C3.

C3 is the most flexible commercial district, so heights setbacks, they're meeting all of those things for parking.

So there's no they're not asking for any variances or anything from the commission.

Because I threw it in with Barry Buick, the commercial district design guidelines for us is just they hit these pretty hard in 2020, but it's the it's the creating places for people, enhancing existing assets, creating connect.

I'll go through all this stuff when we go through it.

But it's those fundamental concepts, which it's part of ABR's review as well.

But for us, they they can talk to this stuff.

Um it was hammered pretty hard the first time through.

So this was the 2020 approval.

Um I took the the conditions, I kind of boiled them down.

Um, and I and I put those on the recommendation slide, just as kind of reminders to go through the topics that were covered in the uh the conditions of approval.

The site plan has not changed.

So it's still two buildings.

There's a west building and an east building, and then the rear parking lots.

Trip generation analysis.

Um I spoke with the engineer that did this in 2020.

There's no real change to it.

It's uh it's very similar to all of these kind of developments that we've seen of car dealerships.

The trip generation change, the new trips is all under 100.

So like there's no they don't warrant a traffic study or anything.

Um so and he feels it's not that his recommendations or conclusions are the same.

Um it's really hard to read with this projector, but there were basically it's a it's a trade, it's no real impact on the area based on the amount of parking and and movements, turning movements, and all those things.