Lakewood Housing, Planning, & Development Committee Meeting - June 17, 2025
Lakewood Housing, Planning, & Development Committee Meeting - June 17, 2025
Note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting was held on June 23, 2025, but the provided instruction states June 17, 2025. This summary uses the instructed date.
The Housing, Planning, & Development Committee met on June 17, 2025 (per instruction) to consider two primary agenda items: an ordinance to amend Chapter 1775 of the Codified Ordinances to allow managed natural landscapes in front yards, and a resolution authorizing submission of the FY25-FY29 HUD Five-Year Consolidated Plan. The committee also approved previous meeting minutes and received communications.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the May 12, 2025 Housing, Planning, & Development Committee meeting were approved unanimously.
- Communication from Building Commissioner: A motion to receive and file the communication from Building Commissioner Christopher Parmelee regarding the addition of LCO 1775.03 (Front Yard Plantings) passed unanimously.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Alison Welch (1656 Orchard Grove, Lakewood Tree Advisory Board member, stormwater intern at NEORSD) expressed strong concern about the proposed setback requirements for managed natural landscapes. She noted that her front yard, which she has cultivated with native plants since 2020, would lose over 64 square feet of established plantings under the 2-4 foot setbacks. She urged the committee to reconsider the buffer zone, emphasizing that well-maintained plantings near sidewalks do not impede sight lines and that removal would harm pollinators and her years of effort. She offered to share expertise and invited committee members to see her yard.
Discussion Items
-
Ordinance 18-2025 – Front Yard Plantings (LCO 1775 amendment): Building Commissioner Parmelee presented the proposed ordinance, which would permit managed natural landscapes—including gardens, wildflowers, and ornamental plants—in front yards while establishing setback requirements to preserve sight lines for pedestrians and vehicles. Key features include a 4-foot setback from the right-of-way and side property lines on corner lots, and a 2-foot setback on interior lots, with a sight triangle. The purpose is to encourage ecological benefits (pollinator support, stormwater management) and give property owners more flexibility.
Committee members raised several issues:
- Kyle Baker suggested two possible amendments: (1) not requiring a setback when adjoining properties both have managed natural landscapes and there is no driveway between them; (2) raising the ground cover height from 5 inches to 8 inches in the buffer area to match typical low-growing plantings. He also inquired about tree-lawn regulations, which are outside the ordinance’s scope.
- Bryan Evans expressed support, noting the ordinance is “high time” and agreed with Baker’s recommendations. He voiced concern about distinguishing weeds from allowable plants.
- Tom Bullock supported updating standards to allow reasonable plantings like sunflowers and living fences, emphasizing the need for clarity for both residents and enforcement staff.
- Sarah Kepple suggested considering a variance mechanism for existing plantings that slightly exceed height limits.
The committee decided to hold the ordinance for further refinement, with Baker working with Bullock and Ms. Welch on language amendments. Commissioner Parmelee indicated openness to modifications and noted the goal is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
-
HUD FY25-FY29 Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Resolution 2025-28): Development Officer Dan Wyman and consultant Rick Sega (HP Group) presented the plan, which is a condition for receiving federal CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds. The plan is regionally focused and jointly developed with the Cuyahoga Housing Consortium (Cleveland Heights, Parma, Euclid, Cuyahoga County). It incorporates Lakewood’s FY25 Annual Action Plan. A 30-day public comment period runs from June 9 to July 8, 2025, with a public hearing on July 2, 2025. The plan includes low- and moderate-income data based on 2016–2020 American Community Survey data. Eligible census tracts for area-based activities grew from 15 to 20 (population from ~17,000 to ~20,000). The committee discussed income thresholds, fair market rents, and the flexibility to amend the plan. The resolution was favorably referred to full City Council.
Key Outcomes
- Approved: May 12, 2025 meeting minutes (unanimous).
- Received and Filed: Communication from Building Commissioner (unanimous).
- Held for Amendments: Ordinance 18-2025 – Front Yard Plantings will be revised with language addressing joint driveway setbacks, ground cover height (proposed 8 inches), and potential variance process, with a target to bring it back to a future committee meeting.
- Favorable Referral: Resolution 2025-28 (HUD Consolidated Plan) was referred to full City Council for a vote at its next meeting (likely July 7 or July 21, 2025).
Meeting Transcript
I'll go ahead and call the June 23rd, 2025 housing planning development committee meeting to order. The first order of business is the approval of the May 12th 2025 housing planning and development committee meeting minutes. Is there a motion to approve? So moved. Motion second. Any discussion? All those in favor say aye. Aye. Eyes have it. Is there a preference on order? We go in. I appreciate the fact that Mr. Wyman uh is here after his having a medical procedure, so we may want to hurry up and get him out. Okay. Well, in that case, then I'll just take it in the order it's on the agenda. Um, which is the communication from uh Commissioner Parmley. Uh just to clean up the docket, I'll go ahead and make a motion to receive and file that communication. Is there a second? Uh any discussion? All those in favor, aye. Aye. Um and then now the ordinance. Uh so I've had time to dig into this a little bit, but I I guess I'll toss it over to Commissioner Parmley. And appreciate the you know, the thought about this. I I certainly you know, a lot of constituents reach out with ideas about plantings and how they can be a little bit more uh stormwater friendly. And I know you know we have our issue with our sewer system is not dry weather flows, it's wet weather flows, and whatever we can do to slow down that stormwater, I think is is good for us. Uh uh, so I'll go ahead and throw over Commissioner Parmley to kind of walk through the ordinance and um have discussion. Uh this is uh this is something that the administration myself been looking at for quite some time. Um pollinators, big issue. Uh without without bees, none of us would be here. Um so to kind of take a look at it to permit you know wild garden, it's not even just wildflowers. I mean, if you could plant tomatoes, you want to do a garden, you don't have a backyard, front yard gets the majority of the sun. Um trying to accompany all those different type types of plannings you can have in the front yard. Um to your point, Councilman Baker, you know, the more natural greenery we have in the front, the less goes into the storm system. So after talking through that, um I think the the main gist of the ordinance is not only allowing these plannings in the front yard, but kind of having the line of sight maintained um on the public or on the private property side, especially with corner lots. I mean, we have the ordinances already where you know bushes on corner lots can't exceed three feet in height, you know, for that reason. So you're not half in the middle of the intersection slamming on the brakes when a kid's trying to cross the street while they're on their phone. Um it it gives homeowners more latitude on on private property. Um it it doesn't go hand in hand with the high grass ordinance that still exists, but it just gives private ownership more ability to kind of make their front yards their own. And this is something you see a lot on deeper lots, on edge water, on lake, um your interior lots typically don't have that kind of frontage. Like me on Rosewood, I mean I have 25 feet in the front yard. Just talking about my street, you know, there's a handful of houses that have been doing this for some years now, but we we do want to be sensitive to overgrowth on the public sidewalk, site triangles, and that buffer in between public right-of-way and private property. Thank you. And I um in doing some research on this, it looked like you did you pull this language from Minneapolis or or was it I don't know, because it's pretty similar. Yeah, no, it's just you? That's my research, me just shooting from the hip. Because I'm curious, we have like we define meadow vegetation, ornamental plan, and rain garden, but we don't really use it in the in the section B. So I was just curious as to kind of if we had some future uh thoughts about getting that into cut into the code. I mean, I'm gonna claim ignorance and speak to my lack of a green thumb. Um again, my primary objective with this was to allow the front yard plannings, um, not allow, permit the front yard plannings, but ensure that you know we're not blocking visibility.
openpublica.com