Housing, Planning, & Development Committee Meeting - March 30, 2026
Housing, Planning, & Development Committee Meeting - March 30, 2026
The Housing, Planning, & Development Committee of Lakewood City Council met on March 30, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Auditorium. The meeting focused on the Zoning Refresh Project, specifically updates to Development Standards (Chapters 1104-1107) as presented by Assistant Planning Director David Baas. Discussion covered proposed standards for fences, screening, outdoor lighting, landscaping, building design materials and articulation, parking, and signs. No votes were taken; the committee received information and provided feedback for further refinement.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the March 9, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously.
Discussion Items
- Zoning Refresh – Development Standards Update: Assistant Planning Director Baas presented draft chapters from the Zoning Policy Advisory Committee (ZPAC) meeting #4, covering General Development Standards (fences, screening, vision triangles, lighting, buffers), Building Design Standards (material tiers, glazing, façade articulation, porches), Parking and Access Standards (minimum/maximum spaces, driveway dimensions, bicycle parking), and Sign Standards (types, illumination, temporary signs). Key points included:
- Fence Opacity: New concept requiring maximum opacity percentages per district and yard type (e.g., 20% in front yards for visibility, 100% in rear yards for screening).
- Building Materials: Introduction of Tier I (premium), Tier II (medium), and Tier III (budget) materials with percentage requirements per zone; discussion on balancing cost with design quality, especially for affordable housing.
- Parking Minimums: Baas noted that national best practices were rejected in favor of current code, which works well 95% of the time, but specific uses (e.g., public assembly) will be better defined.
- Garage Requirement: The current rule requiring one parking space in a garage for single-family units was debated; Council members noted both support for retention and removal, with potential for a sliding scale.
- Sign Glare and Temporary Signs: Concerns were raised about overly bright signs and lingering temporary signage; Baas acknowledged enforcement challenges and plans to add clarity on lighting limits and duration.
- Affordable Housing Considerations: Councilman Baker and Councilwoman Hamilton Steiner emphasized the need to align zoning with housing affordability goals. Baas noted that allowing more density and streamlining processes can reduce costs.
- Process for Final Review: Baas outlined next steps: ZPAC meeting in May for subdivision standards/procedures, committee review in June, then joint review with Committee of the Whole and Planning Commission over summer/fall, targeting final approval by end of 2026.
Key Outcomes
- No formal decisions or votes were taken. The committee received the presentation and provided guidance for continued drafting.
- Next ZPAC Meeting: Scheduled for May 19, 2026, to review subdivision standards, zoning procedures, and definitions.
- Next Committee Update: Expected in June 2026 to review ZPAC outcomes.
Meeting Transcript
Without further ado, given the time, we're going to roll right into the March 30th 2026 meeting of the Housing Planning and Development Committee. First order of business is approval of the minutes of the March 9th, 2026 meeting of the housing planning and bellotomy. I'll make a motion to approve. All is in favor. Aye. Motion carries. First order of business and uh order of business today. Um communication from Assistant Planning Director Boss regarding the zoning refresh standard update uh development standards. So whenever whenever you're ready, assistant director, boss can hit it. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I was just pulling it up. So let me shift here. All right, Mr. Chair, members of the council. So this is a uh these are the slides from our uh zoning policy advisory committee meeting number four uh that we held that was held back in January, mid-January. Um so um as you all aware, just uh in terms of a quick recap. So as we've been working through the zoning refresh effort, uh, which is supported by House El Lavine as the primary consultant uh on that. It is it is a long-term project. I think everyone recognizes that. We have been working on it for a long time. Um, but we are working towards uh finishing it up by the end of this year. That was that was kind of the general intention. Going into this, we knew that it was an 18-plus month um project. Um it's it's an awful lot of work. So this is the uh this is the fourth meeting of this committee that includes both uh council members uh Baker and Keppel uh as kind of our two primary council advisors. There's two members of the planning commission, and then there's uh kind of a uh a variety of stakeholders across resident, developer, real estate, chamber of commerce, like you kind of we get a smattering of a lot of different folks from different walks of life that are generally familiar with zoning, design review, the different kind of functions that zoning drives. Um so because it is so process heavy in terms of the advisory committee. Um there has been, it's it's been a while, but there has been community engagement involvement up front to kind of identify the issues and the recommendations that we move forward on. Um so, but now uh for this, we are we are well in the the weeds and and and doing the work of of actually revising of drafting and revising the new chapters of code. Um so this one uh this meeting and these four chapters uh that I'll advance here so you can see. Um so it's chapter four, five, and six, and seven. So these are your basically what the architectural border review, as well as the planning commission a little bit kind of delve into uh that's fun. The uh the your development standards. Not something that I will say right now is a strong point of our current code. Um the pieces of this are very smattered across a million different places and have been developed over the last 15 to 20 years through different uh commercial design guidelines, uh front porch guidelines, uh, a portion of our local building code in 132508 that talks about parking lot design, and then like the individual lines of code that are in supplemental regulations, district regulations, and everything that talk about parking, um, screening, landscaping, like all these things, sign standards, another section under local building code. Um, pulling these all into the zoning chapter and putting and and and organizing them in a in a much more user-friendly, um, and I when I say user-friendly, it's not only businesses and developers, but also our own department of knowing where to find everything, and it's it's it's logically organized. Um this is probably one of the hardest efforts in the in this um in this larger effort of this refresh effort. You know, looking at use requirements and commercial districts and stuff like that, like we have that chapter now, it's just revising that chapter, and and but this was pulling a million puzzle pieces from different rooms of your house and trying to put it into some form. And then those puzzle pieces often are the most difficult to nail down. When you're talking about uh building design and design guidelines, it's hard to get 12 people to agree on the right approach and you know what is because largely this drives what will basically be allowed by right in terms of building development and design versus what has to go to a board for review. That's that is one of the overarching kind of intentions of this effort is clarifying and streamlining design development review processes that right now pretty much everything uh if you read the code uh on face value would have to go to architectural border review to go through. It is a frustrating point for lots of residents, architects, and everything that everything from a garage to the downtown development goes through the same process, um, and yet there are just not very objective standards in terms of what they're asked to meet versus you know the subjective review of five architects that are like, I don't like that, I like that. And then you go to the next guy, and he's got three other things that he doesn't like or likes. And so it's very hard. We did work over the last two years to come up with new residential design guidelines. So there has been some work recently that's that's really informed a lot of these things, and we'll continue to inform this process. Um I'm gonna try to, in interest of time, I'm gonna try to step through these things pretty quickly, kind of highlight the main points of each of them, just and then we can so we can get to some questions. This is where we are, seven uh in terms of the broader refresh effort, step uh five. Um, and so or this is where we were with the ZPAC.
openpublica.com