OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Laurel, Montana/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Laurel City Council Meeting - July 21, 2026: Water Model Assessment, Planning Board Appointments, and Employee Recognitions

City Council — Tuesday, July 21, 2026
BodyLaurel, Montana
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, July 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 28:32

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:37

Okay,

Speaker 1

0:38

we're going to call this meeting to order.

0:40

Welcome.

0:40

By your presence in the city council chambers this evening, you are participating in the process of representative government.

0:46

To encourage the participation, the city council has specified times for citizen comments on its agenda.

0:52

Once following the consent agenda, at which time citizens may address the council concerning any brief community announcement, not to exceed one minute in duration for any speaker.

1:02

And again, following items removed from the consent agenda.

1:06

Each speaker will be limited to three minutes unless the time limit is extended by the mayor with the consent of the council.

1:12

Citizens may also comment

Speaker 2

1:13

on the

Speaker 1

1:14

item and

Speaker 2

1:14

order

Speaker 1

1:14

from the city council chambers this evening you are three minutes.

7:38

Seeing none we'll move to executive review.

7:42

Resolution of the city council authorizing the mayor to execute the task order and all related documents for the water model assessment by and between the city of Laurel and Morrison Maryland.

Speaker 3

7:59

So this is a task order that uh we are asking the mayor of sign that uh we'll summarily to do a complete study on our water system to find out where we're actually adding the world, how much we can supply, where we can supply it to this is not a short study.

8:22

It uh we'll be going on for a significant period of time.

8:27

Um those of you who were at public works last night, maybe have a little bit better grasp, but uh we've needed to do this for a period in time, and now the timing was uh a good time to get started.

Unassigned speaker

8:45

I'm

Speaker 1

8:45

gonna have you stay up there, Matt.

8:46

All four of these are yours.

Speaker 3

8:50

Okay.

8:53

Where we can supply it.

8:54

Yeah.

8:54

Public have any questions.

8:57

Yeah,

Speaker 4

8:59

so this is gonna kind of look at outwest as well, right?

9:03

Yes.

9:04

Um I guess I'm kind of concerned about potential people who want development outwest and seem to think that we have the capacity to serve them.

9:19

You're saying it's gonna potentially be a long time line.

9:22

Yes.

9:23

Um, how are we going to be able to answer them?

9:33

Okay.

9:34

So

Speaker 3

9:35

to answer that to perfect question.

9:37

I can there's a lot of lot of stuff we don't know.

Unassigned speaker

9:40

I guess that's a good idea.

Speaker 3

9:40

And the question that Laura just asked is very good question.

9:45

We have no real answer of what we can supply at this time.

9:50

Based on booster pumps, water plant, water line condition, size of water lines.

10:04

And part of it is also going to involve will be in the long worm well on long-term plan of a new reservoir to answer that and new water lines being installed in different parts of the city.

10:18

Does

Unassigned speaker

10:18

that very good question

Speaker 3

10:19

somewhat answer?

Unassigned speaker

10:20

We have no

Speaker 4

10:22

real

Unassigned speaker

10:23

answer.

Speaker 4

10:24

Because they have made statements that we have stated we have the capacity.

10:30

So that is nowhere that I have seen though.

10:35

So we can dispel that, right?

10:37

That we have nowhere that we've stated that we can serve them.

10:43

But

Speaker 1

10:45

I guess I'm just kind of considering that it's just that uh they're going to determine our capacity.

Speaker 3

10:50

Okay.

Speaker 1

10:51

Um so we we have not uh we don't know what our capacity is.

10:55

That's why we hired this engineering firm to do that.

10:58

And so um, they will also be looking at um quite a few proposed subdivisions and uh our ability to serve them and uh serve them in order of of their annexation because there are there are a few subdivisions out there, three right now that uh have been annexed already, but that don't know if we can serve them as well.

11:20

So that this will help everybody in the community.

Speaker 2

11:23

They're going to determine our thank you.

Unassigned speaker

11:25

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural███████████████████████████████████35%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████23%
Water And Wastewater Management█████████████████17%
Community Engagement███████████████15%
Personnel Matters███████7%
Fiscal Sustainability███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Laurel City Council Meeting - July 21, 2026

Time: 6:30 PM, Council Chambers. The meeting covered four task order resolutions for engineering services, a process for City/County Planning Board appointments, and recognition of employees and volunteers.

Consent Calendar

No consent calendar was presented; all items were discussed individually.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Elizabeth Gilk (Laurel resident) expressed interest in obtaining a cost estimate from Morrison-Maierle for a new water tank and running water to north Laurel, to aid in discussions about a potential psychiatric prison relocation. She noted it could also support future annexation and city revenue.
  • A public commenter questioned the $5,000 fee for the FY27 RRG grant assistance application, asking if it was too expensive for simply filling out a form and what the risk of losing that money was. Councilmember Matt Wheeler responded that staff are not professional grant writers, past grant attempts have failed, and $5,000 is reasonable for the expertise and potential $40,000 return.

Discussion Items

  • Water Model Assessment (Task Order #1): Resolution authorizing the mayor to execute a task order with Morrison-Maierle for a comprehensive water system study to determine capacity, supply, and future needs. Councilmember Laura Naylor expressed concern about development west of Laurel, noting developers believe capacity exists but the city lacks data. The study will also evaluate pending subdivisions and their service order. Councilmember Elizabeth Gilk asked if a cost estimate for a new water tower could be included; the mayor stated the study covers future growth and will coordinate with interstate engineering on the MLUPA plan.
  • Laurel Industrial Park MFE Review (Task Order #2): Resolution for task order to review a commercial development at Washington and East Railroad. No issues expected. No public comments.
  • Casa Linda Subdivision Block 4 MFE Review (Task Order #3): Resolution for task order to review a residential subdivision on West Ninth Street, already annexed, planned since the 1970s. No issues expected. No public comments.
  • FY27 RRG Planning Grant Assistance (Task Order #4): Resolution for task order to pay Morrison-Maierle $5,000 to apply for up to $40,000 in grant funding. Councilmember Matt Wheeler stated the city has a good chance (estimated 55% success rate) based on current planning needs. The funds would cover engineering costs. Council reached consensus to proceed.
  • City/County Planning Board Appointments Clarification: Mayor proposed a process for council appointments: solicit applications from public, council, and eligible staff; share with council for interviews and selection. Council President Canopy and Vice President Naylor agreed. The process will differentiate between official (council) and mayor appointments.

Key Outcomes

  • All four task order resolutions were approved by consensus (no vote recorded).
  • The council agreed to adopt the proposed process for planning board appointments: solicitation, application review, and council selection.
  • Employee and Volunteer Recognition: A list of 43 employees and 27 volunteers with years of service from July to December 2026 was read, with the longest service of 31 years (Nancy Schmidt, librarian; Susan Canopy, police).

Meeting Transcript

Okay, we're going to call this meeting to order. Welcome. By your presence in the city council chambers this evening, you are participating in the process of representative government. To encourage the participation, the city council has specified times for citizen comments on its agenda. Once following the consent agenda, at which time citizens may address the council concerning any brief community announcement, not to exceed one minute in duration for any speaker. And again, following items removed from the consent agenda. Each speaker will be limited to three minutes unless the time limit is extended by the mayor with the consent of the council. Citizens may also comment on the item and order from the city council chambers this evening you are three minutes. Seeing none we'll move to executive review. Resolution of the city council authorizing the mayor to execute the task order and all related documents for the water model assessment by and between the city of Laurel and Morrison Maryland. So this is a task order that uh we are asking the mayor of sign that uh we'll summarily to do a complete study on our water system to find out where we're actually adding the world, how much we can supply, where we can supply it to this is not a short study. It uh we'll be going on for a significant period of time. Um those of you who were at public works last night, maybe have a little bit better grasp, but uh we've needed to do this for a period in time, and now the timing was uh a good time to get started. I'm gonna have you stay up there, Matt. All four of these are yours. Okay. Where we can supply it. Yeah. Public have any questions. Yeah, so this is gonna kind of look at outwest as well, right? Yes. Um I guess I'm kind of concerned about potential people who want development outwest and seem to think that we have the capacity to serve them. You're saying it's gonna potentially be a long time line. Yes. Um, how are we going to be able to answer them? Okay. So to answer that to perfect question. I can there's a lot of lot of stuff we don't know. I guess that's a good idea. And the question that Laura just asked is very good question. We have no real answer of what we can supply at this time. Based on booster pumps, water plant, water line condition, size of water lines. And part of it is also going to involve will be in the long worm well on long-term plan of a new reservoir to answer that and new water lines being installed in different parts of the city. Does that very good question somewhat answer? We have no real answer. Because they have made statements that we have stated we have the capacity. So that is nowhere that I have seen though. So we can dispel that, right?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com