Louisville Metro Public Works Committee Meeting - June 2, 2026
Louisville Metro Public Works Committee Meeting - June 2, 2026
The Public Works Committee of the Louisville Metro Council met on June 2, 2026, at 4:00 PM (adjourned at 4:25 PM) in Council Chambers and virtually. Chair Jeff Hudson (R-23) presided with a quorum of eight members. The committee considered two pending ordinances and a slate of appointments to the Complete Streets Coalition (CSC). All items were held in committee after extensive discussion on the diversity requirements for the CSC appointments. No votes were taken.
Pending Legislation
- O-043-26 (Amending LMCO Chapter 112 on posting handbills/signs) – Held in committee without discussion.
- O-133-26 (Amending LMCO Chapter 99 on noise regulation) – Held in committee without discussion.
Discussion Items
- Complete Streets Coalition Appointments: The committee reviewed fourteen appointments and reappointments to the CSC, including new members Kristi Ashby, Adam Stegemann, Brad Herschler, Mira Sullivan, and reappointments of Lucas Frazier, Anita Hall, Janet Heston, Patrick Smith, Joseph B. Spencer, Kenneth Thompson, Estela Valdez, Bill Wright, and others. Jeremy Chesler (Transportation Planner) and Wes Sydnor (Director of Public Works) described the CSC's role in reviewing transportation projects for multimodal accessibility. Chair Hudson noted that the CSC's composition (all white, all Democratic) did not comply with LMCO 32.001, which requires diversity in race, gender, political affiliation, and geography. Michael Spenlau (County Attorney's Office) confirmed that the current slate did not meet the ordinance's diversity requirements. Councilwoman Jennifer Chappell provided background on the CSC's creation in 2022 and its funding history. Deputy Mayor Nicole George clarified that the coalition was not intended to be defunct and that prior funding was one-time. After extended discussion, Chair Hudson decided to hold all appointments pending legal guidance on how to achieve the required diversity.
- General Questions: Councilwoman Crystal Bast asked about bike lane usage; Jeremy Chesler explained that cyclists are not required to use bike lanes and may ride on the road.
Key Outcomes
- All appointments (Items 3–14) were held in committee, with no action taken. Chair Hudson apologized to the nominees and stated the hold was necessary to obtain a legal opinion from the County Attorney's Office on how to meet the diversity requirements of LMCO 32.001.
- The two pending ordinances (O-043-26 and O-133-26) remain in committee.
- Next steps: The committee will revisit the appointments once legal guidance is received; the action deadline for most items is October 23, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
Thoughtfully um located and oriented on the site than then the existing mall. So what we kind of kind of modern development now is is we kind of try to push the parking fields to the middle of the site with the buildings on the periphery to kind of give them that that street front presence. Whereas the mall right now, it's the opposite. It's it's you know, the the improvements are in the middle of the site with a sea of parking around it. So we're we're kind of trying to create kind of the donut idea with parking screened in the middle of the site, all the buildings up against the the roads to the extent they can be put there to really kind of create more of a presence uh for the community. So that's that's really the goal with our existing design. And the space sits between Bardstown Road and Baxter Avenue. So you're you'll have kind of filling that entire space there, correct? Correct. Mm-hmm. That's right. And we are talking that there will be entrances from both roads into the space. There'll be entrances from from both roads into the site uh itself. Uh most of the storefront entrances will either be on Bardstown or interior to the site along the parking or where the primary parking field is, which is in the middle of the site. We were talking a little bit about what kind of businesses are you anticipating being in the mid-city market. So the goal in all these projects are very similar in that sense that we want um a mixture of uses, medical, some office, restaurants, boutiques, heavy, heavily typically heavily focused on service-oriented industries, as most of these projects are kind of servicing the local community. And then a mixture of kind of national, regional, and local tenants. We want to flavor up all of it. There are certain national tenants that I think would be highly sought after and highly in demand in this particular location, but we also want the center to kind of reflect the community. And so the goal would be to get some local tenancy in here as well that that the community knows, loves, and and is happy to embrace as part of the project. Okay. And what has been a part of the mid-city mall was the Shelby Park library as well. And there were discussions about whether the library was going to be staying there. And can you give us an update on that? Yeah, yeah. So I think the mayor announced it. So this is public information that they have allocated money in the budget for the relocation of the library on site. We have entered into a letter agreement uh with the uh city for the relocation of the library. Um, and right now we're kind of working through the kind of binding contractual phase of that. But I can say this there's been a true meeting of the minds at this point, and we're in agreement on the on the outline or general framework of the deal. And at this point, I don't see anything stopping us from from uh uh ultimately um creating a new library branch at this location, which which we think is a huge amenity to the shopping center and and hopefully really um gives gives back to some of what the community really wanted that uh uh wanted to see as part of this redevelopment. So we're we're very excited uh for that component of this. Absolutely. And speaking of that, you did have several meetings and had public input into the development of this project. Is that true? We did, yes. Uh, I mean, I think to date, to be honest, uh, I think we're like at meeting number 38 or 39, and that's over about a seven-month process. Uh, we knew that this project, given its location, given the educational attainment of the neighborhood, which is very high, given how long this project's been in the community now, you know, 50, 60 plus years, we felt like it was absolutely critical to get community engagement in the project and get community input. And a lot of our site plan and our design was shaped by the community. The addition of the Rosewood Park on the backside of uh our grocery tenant, the um wall mural art on the backside of our grocery tenant, the relocation incorporation of the library, the preservation of the um the uh park on um on the backside of the library, which which is now called kind of affectionately referred to as Beechwood Park, which is actually owned by the mall ownership, but will now really ultimately most likely become part of the city property. Those type of that type of feedback um and back and forth dialogue really did shape this development. The inclusion of two-story shops up along Baxter to give the shops more of a street presence since we were we were really limited on how much of the site we could affect by the existing leases with Heine Brothers and both raising canes. So the idea was even though we couldn't put the buildings right on the street, if we gave them more height, it would they would feel closer to the street. So we created story and a half design on the building behind Raising Canes and a full two-story, true two-story design behind Heine Brothers. Those type of comments, both from city staff but from the neighborhoods, was was really effectuated and affected our ultimate design. And I do, I'm very proud of the fact that ultimately when what we ended up with, I think is going to be special as a result of that. So I think community engagement is good. Um it doesn't mean we can that everybody gets what they want in that process, but it certainly impacts design and typically in a very positive way. Yes. Yeah, and many, many, I mean, you know, you're saying almost 40 meetings or what have you, so that's a lot of opportunity for people to express their uh input, what they'd like to share on there too.
openpublica.com