The Planning and Zoning Committee met on September 15, 2026, at 1:03 PM in Council Chambers and via video teleconference, chaired by Andrew Owen (D-9). The committee considered five pending legislative items and adjourned at 2:21 PM.
1. O-225-26 – Detailed District Development Plan (8803-8807 Old Bardstown Road, 7.02 acres)
2. O-240-26 – Road Width Amendment (LDC 25-LDC-0003)
5. O-251-26 – Data Center Regulations (25-LDC-0014)
Sometimes we say oh no more. I know I want you to get a birthday. Okay, we're gonna see this. Okay, perfect. Okay. Yeah. We're not here for more point. Yeah. Start with the rare. Yeah. Yeah. That got a lot of short sorts of screens. Metro TV will get started in 30 seconds. All right. So welcome to the regularly scheduled meeting of the planning and zoning committee for September 15th, 2026. The time is 103 p.m. We do have some people joining us online. So this meeting is being held pursuant to KRS 61.826 and Council. 5A. I'm the chair of the committee, Andrew Owen. I'm joined by my vice chair Scott Reid virtually, joined virtually by Councilwoman Josie Raymond, by Councilwoman Shemika Parrish Wright, and I'm joined in chambers by Councilman Hudson, Councilman Benson, Councilman Batshan, Councilman Piagentini has joined us. And Councilman Bradger. Okay. And we are also joined by Councilman Herndon. Thank you very much for joining us. Okay, so we are going to start off with uh item number one on the agenda, which is O-225-26, an ordinance relating to the detailed district development plan for property located at 8803, 8805, and 8807 Old Barstown Road, containing approximately 7.02 acres and being in Louisville Metro, case number 26 DDP 0005. Can I get a motion? Properly moved and seconded. Uh Julia, is this on your plate? No, this was uh held a couple times. Uh-huh. And been presented. Right. Um, so this is in Councilman Bratcher's district, so maybe we should start there. Uh and you can kind of um tell us we we've held it in in committee a couple times and now we're back back around to it. So if you can give us kind of an overview. Yes, sir. It passed through the system, and then uh uh the the developer wanted some changes, so it goes back to the it was substantial changes, so it goes back to the planning commission. And when they come up, I think they made an error and they left out the the standard element and some other things, and we're just putting it back in. And the the developer had no problem with putting it back in. We think it was an error. So there are binding elements that uh are in the form of an amendment on the ass on the system. Yeah. That's what I understand. Yes. Um Laura, do you is there are there things in those binding elements that you can kind of highlight for us? Yeah, so the request by the developer as part of the revised plan was to increase the height requirement and binding element number nine from 25 feet to 27 feet and extend what happened is and it might have just been um as part of a cleanup that instead of just amending that one binding element, both height restriction binding elements that have been added by council were recommended for deletion by the planning commission. So we confirmed with the developer that the developer was fine with those not being deleted and just having the one change on binding element number nine from 25 to 27 feet. So there's an amendment in the system that would put those two back in, and then it just remembers the council review binding element because typically we like it to be the last one. Okay, so council branch would be like that amendment for us before it's coming to the case.