Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Louisville Metro Planning and Zoning Committee met on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, in Council Chambers and by video teleconference, beginning at approximately 1:03 p.m.; the tentative minutes record the call to order at 1:04 p.m. Chair Andrew Owen (D-9) presided, with Vice Chair Scott Reed (R-16) attending virtually. A quorum was present. The tentative minutes roll call lists Shameka Parrish-Wright (D-3) as present, but the recorded vote on O-281-26 lists her as absent; the transcript indicates she arrived later during the meeting. Josie Raymond (D-10) was excused. Non-committee council members present included Tammy Hawkins (D-1), Ken Herndon (D-4), JP Lyninger (D-6), Jonathan Joseph (R-12), and Anthony Piagentini (R-19). The committee recommended one zoning ordinance for approval, held two pending ordinances, heard invited expert testimony on data center regulation, and adjourned without objection at 2:58 p.m. No public comment period was held.
O-281-26 - Zoning change at 211 South 41st Street (Case No. 25ZONE0142) - Brian Davis of the Louisville Metro Office of Planning presented the Planning Commission's recommendation. The approximately 0.1-acre property, located in Metro Council District 5, is currently zoned R-5 and would be rezoned to R-7 to make an existing residential triplex compliant with zoning law. No exterior changes are proposed. The applicant's neighborhood meeting was held August 27, 2025, and the Planning Commission held a public hearing September 3, 2026, voting 5-2 to recommend approval. The committee voted 6-0 to recommend approval, with Owen, Reed, Benson, Ruhe, Hudson, and Batshon voting yes; Raymond was excused and Parrish-Wright was absent for that vote. The ordinance was sent to Old Business for the full Metro Council meeting on October 15, 2026. Council Member Donna L. Purvis (D-5) is eligible to vote on this zoning change. The statutory action deadline is December 12, 2026.
O-282-26 - Closure of unnamed rights-of-way near Old Manslick Road (Case No. 26STRCLOSURE0025) - This ordinance would close unnamed portions of right-of-way directly south and southwest of Old Manslick Road, containing approximately 39,500 square feet. The item was held in committee with no vote. The statutory action deadline is March 24, 2027.
O-251-26 - Land Development Code amendments regarding data centers (Case No. 25-LDC-0014) - This ordinance remained held in committee with no vote. The statutory action deadline is March 10, 2027.
Robin Palm, planning administrator for the Village of Mt. Pleasant, Wisconsin, described his community's experience with a large data center buildout. Palm noted that Microsoft's Fairwater campus, which opened in June 2026, is about 1.5 million square feet. The first phase included four data centers totaling about 4 million square feet; 15 more data centers were approved in January 2026, bringing the total pipeline to about 12 million square feet with a projected total assessed value of $23 billion. For context, the village's total assessed value in 2017 was about $3.4 billion.
Palm explained that the Foxconn project, which originally promised 13,000 jobs, set up the land, infrastructure, and zoning that later attracted Microsoft. Foxconn is now expected to reach 2,000 permanent jobs by 2030. Microsoft currently has about 400 employees at its first completed building and another 400 expected at the second building, which Palm said exceeded initial job expectations. Microsoft did not request new incentives and later returned a $5 million incentive to the village, an amount Palm described as about one-quarter of the village's operating budget. At the January 2026 approval, Palm said the largest public contingent was union members from the local engineering and workers union supporting continued construction jobs.
Palm recommended forward-looking, predictable zoning standards and clear decision points, warning that opposition often escalates after approvals are vested. On impacts, Palm reported noise complaints from the neighboring community of Sturtevant, though his own unscientific visit to the site found the closest housing development about one-half to three-quarters of a mile away. The operator requested 30-foot sound walls even though the village's code allowed 10-foot walls in industrial districts, leading the village to amend its code to allow taller walls when needed to meet sound ordinances. Palm emphasized that low-frequency noise is difficult to measure with standard dBA meters and recommended separating noise standards by octave and frequency.
Palm said the data centers receive power from the regulated utility We Energies rather than generating their own power. At full buildout, the campus could use about 25% of Wisconsin's pre-campus power supply. He noted statewide utility bills have been rising roughly 5-6% due to multiple factors, and he could not attribute the increase solely to data centers. Diesel generators are used only as a backup redundancy and are tested about once a month. The campus draws water from Lake Michigan, about six miles away, under approvals allowing up to 7 million gallons per day; Palm noted liquid cooling uses less water but more electricity. He also highlighted waste heat as a major planning opportunity, saying the Fairwater campus alone could heat the roughly 700,000 square feet of indoor water parks in Wisconsin Dells about 20 times over, or heat all homes in Racine County over the winter, if district heating systems were built from the start.
Tom Fitzgerald, attorney and former longtime director of the Kentucky Resources Council, presented the KRC model data center ordinance and described research he conducted into best practices in Northern Virginia, Pennsylvania, and other locations. Fitzgerald described KRC as a nonprofit environmental legal aid organization that accepts no corporate or government money and typically represents communities downhill, downwind, and downstream. He said the model ordinance is not meant to be adopted in its entirety, but provides tools for local governments.
Fitzgerald stated that KRC's recommendations apply to all data centers, not just hyperscale facilities, because there is no accepted definition of hyperscale and because a facility's square footage does not necessarily correlate with its off-site impacts. He recommended performance standards based on the intensity of the use, requiring acoustical and vibration studies, monitoring, and mitigation; treating existing data centers as accessory uses; applying standards to new or expanded facilities rather than retroactively; and avoiding exemptions for telecom hotels. He also recommended creating a new data center zoning district and requiring a rezoning paired with a conditional use permit, rather than allowing data centers by right based on square footage. Fitzgerald cautioned that a categorical ban on facilities over 500,000 square feet would be harder to defend than a regulatory framework, and if the ban is retained, the ordinance should include fallback standards and legislative findings explaining its rationale.
Fitzgerald cited OstraGuard v. Microsoft, a federal class action filed in July 2026, alleging that low-frequency infrasound from Microsoft's Fairwater campus is causing off-site harm. He said standard dBA decibel measurements can miss low-frequency noise, and recommended using broader noise metrics, evaluating tonality and cumulative impacts, and requiring post-operation monitoring. He also said emerging peer-reviewed research associates chronic low-frequency noise exposure with elevated blood pressure and other physiological stress responses. He offered to provide peer-reviewed studies and a copy of the lawsuit to committee members.
Fitzgerald argued against concentrating data centers in existing industrial areas, noting that older industrial corridors such as Rubbertown and parts of Southwest Louisville already carry disproportionate environmental burdens. He stated that a new zoning district with a conditional use permit process would allow data centers to be sited countywide, but only after public review, rather than automatically placing them in areas zoned M-3. Chair Owen added that when the Planning Commission examined M-3 zoning, it was almost exclusively located in South and Southwest Louisville, which he said was not acceptable; a new zoning category would open other parts of the county to data centers, though not by right.
During discussion, Committee Member Shameka Parrish-Wright called for adding a health impact statement to the ordinance and said the committee should incorporate more of KRC's recommendations. She referenced high cancer, heart disease, and respiratory illness rates in West Louisville and Southwest Louisville and described the data center ordinance as a chance to avoid repeating past land-use mistakes. Council Member Tammy Hawkins asked whether the recommendations applied to all data centers and how consistency would be achieved; Fitzgerald said the rules would apply to new and expanded facilities, while existing nuisances could be addressed through existing nuisance law. Committee Member Jeff Hudson asked about health effects of low-frequency noise and comparisons to other industries; Fitzgerald said he would provide peer-reviewed literature. Committee Member Khalil Batshon questioned whether a new zoning district was simply another way to stop development; Fitzgerald responded that reasonable standards would not amount to improper outzoning. Vice Chair Reed asked about the village's decibel limits; Palm described octave-based limits that vary by zone and offered to share his code. Palm also advised that universal noise limits could be set through general police power and nuisance law, like speed limits, rather than through zoning alone.
All behind us is reflective of just yet another part of the importance of the logistics industry here in Louisville, about how many jobs it creates, about how many things are happening behind so many of these walls in business parks like the one that we're in right now, and how many good jobs are being created as a result of when people are buying their next pair of authenticated sneakers or the next Pokemon card or the next handbag, they probably might not know that it's coming through Louisville, Kentucky. Part of why we chose Louisville, as Mayor was saying was because of logistics. It's in the center. We've got so thousands and thousands of packages coming in from our sellers from the entrepreneurs and going out to the buyers. But these are, I mean, they're trading cards. Like this is a big package. So thousands of thousands of envelopes are going out through U.S. Post. We're already seeing, you know, packages that are getting from sellers faster and going out to buyers a whole lot faster. Signs placed illegally in the public right-of-way create clutter in our roads, creating safety hazards that block sidelines for motorists and pedestrians. Under the previous ordinance, placing signs in the public right-of-way was illegal and a criminal violation. In practice, it made enforcement difficult as it required catching someone in the act of placing a sign. Part of the problem that we have here is that it's a distraction. You know, it creates litter. It's something that when we're doing mowing in public right away, uh, it creates a problem for those uh that those pieces of equipment. When you see the we hang Christmas lights or we buy apartments, or and those are then stapled to telephone posts or taped to the back of stop signs. I mean, you know, these are not billboards. Uh, they're not there for commercial purposes. This is litter that the city then has to go and and clean up. We're starting with this public relations effort to try to make people aware that you know this kind of signage, you know, if you want to put it out, great, but it needs to be on your property, or you need to talk to uh a property owner and get permission to put it there, but don't put it in the public right away and make it somebody else's problem. The idea behind this unit is to make water accessible, the Gotmobile. That unit can reach anywhere, okay, any time, any weather, and can adopt itself by analyzing the source of water and creating different process to treat the specific water. There's been a brewing for eight or ten years as we've tried to understand the application of mobile water treatment and disaster response. Mobile water treatment is important, but it's not really being done. Today we're announcing that we're continuing very publicly to have mobile water treatment in the state of Kentucky. In emergency situation, it can keep alive 20,000 people every day. It can run continuously like a generator that allows any water, surface water, boil advisory water to be able to be treated, put in tanks, and accessible to those people in Kentucky living in those disaster situations. This is the only thing that they need to do. Just to hit the green button, put the basket into the source of water, and the system will do everything by itself. Do we want to taste it? All right. Now we're able to take these machines, especially the Gal Mobile machine, treat water, set up silo tanks, and be able to use a different basis so people can have access to that safe water, access to that disinfectant, using a machine that's not tearing up the roads, or if the roads are torn up, it can travel there easily. Hopefully, very soon Kentucky will embrace this officially, this mobile water treatment plan. Hey, Robin. Uh, thank you for being here. Can you hear me? We cannot hear you. You're muted. Okay, I wasn't muted by you guys, and then I didn't take it off. So, hello, I'm here. Thank you. I appreciate you being here. Um, it's good to be here.