OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Maui County, Hawaii/County Council & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Maui County Housing and Land Use Committee Meeting – October 21, 2026: Research Park and Lanai Project District Amendments

County Council & Committees — Wednesday, October 21, 2026
BodyMaui County, Hawaii
SessionCounty Council & Committees
DateWednesday, October 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:49:47

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Activity in the

Speaker 2

0:01

future.

Speaker 3

0:02

Next, please.

Speaker 2

0:06

Acreage adjustments are also being made to increase residential area and reduce commercial area to match the map change as these go hand in hand.

0:17

The adjustments also avoid minor minor decimal differences created by defining numbers to the thousandth decimal point.

0:26

Instead, up to an at least language would be used.

0:30

The overall boundary of the Maori Research and Technology Park District remains the same at about 390 acres.

0:38

Next, please.

0:42

The amendments also include allowing minor medical centers as a permitted use in the civic district, shown in blue on this map.

0:51

Currently, larger overnight facilities are major medical centers are permitted in the civic district.

0:58

The amendment would allow smaller medical facilities without overnight care, like doctor's offices and urgent care facilities.

1:06

Next development standards regulate how lots and buildings are built, like lot sizes, building heights, building sizes, and setbacks.

1:18

The proposed amendments incorporate more practical development standards to accommodate real-world site conditions.

1:26

The amendments would remove the parking access and primary frontage requirements, adjust density and floor area ratio requirements, adjust front setback requirements, and increase maximum lot and unit sizes allowed for residential lots.

1:44

As mentioned previously, a variance was secured from the board of variances and appeals, which allows most of those standards already.

1:53

The code amendment codifies the variants approved.

1:57

Next, please.

2:27

No new zoning districts are being added, and no new permitted use categories are created.

2:34

Next today, we are kindly asking the committee for its support of bill number 141.

2:42

The amendments support housing needs and give flexibility in how that housing is provided.

2:48

The amendments also codify the approved variants and address issues experienced with implementing the code since it was adopted.

2:57

We appreciate the Maui Planning Commission's recommendation for approval and the incorporated caps to single family large lots.

3:10

Thank you for your time this morning.

Speaker 4

3:14

Thank you very much for that presentation.

3:16

Planning, do you folks have anything you would like to

Unassigned speaker

3:19

add?

Speaker 5

3:20

Good morning, Chair Ooh Hodgins and members of the committee.

3:23

Um we don't have much to add.

3:25

That was a very thorough presentation by Miss Mukai.

3:28

Um I might be repetitive here, but just a few key points.

3:31

Um, like was stated in the presentation.

3:33

Some of these development standards uh were already approved via variants, and so this is just codifying some of them, which we appreciate because the department would rather see these standards be in our county code versus via variants.

3:47

Um, this did go to the Maui Planning Commission.

3:49

Um, there was four uh pieces of testimony that were all in support of this project.

3:55

Um, and the commission was very supportive of this, and so therefore we we are also supportive of this.

4:01

Thank you, Chair.

Speaker 4

4:02

Thank you very much.

4:04

Um, before we go on to our discussion, do we have any other people signed up to testify on this item?

Speaker 6

4:19

Chair, there's currently no one signed up to testify.

Speaker 4

4:22

Great members saying there are no individuals wishing to testify without objection.

4:25

I would now close oral testimony for this item.

4:29

Thank you very much.

4:29

We're gonna be implementing a three-minute question discussion.

4:33

Um, so we're gonna begin with Vice Chair Batangan if you have any questions and then I'll I'll go down the line.

4:39

Thank

Unassigned speaker

4:39

you.

Speaker 7

4:40

Thank you, Chair.

4:41

Not too many questions.

4:42

Uh

Unassigned speaker

4:43

I

Speaker 7

4:43

supported this when we uh transmitted it to the planning commission for uh their review and comment.

4:50

I was very happy to see that they were supportive, as was the department.

Unassigned speaker

4:54

Can you just give me a little bit more information on the um recommendation that was incorporated from the MPC into the into the bill?

Speaker 5

5:06

Thank you, Chair.

5:07

Uh so as part of the comments from the planning department's long range division, there was some concern that um this single family large lot type, it did not have restrictions on the size of the the lot or the units.

5:24

Um and you know, we don't anticipate that this applicant would would do this, but there is a concern that in the future perhaps you could have somebody come in and then create really large lots, really large homes.

5:36

So the applicant did agree um and did offer to the commission to cap the size of the lots to 14,000 square feet and then the size of the units to

Speaker 7

5:44

the concern originating with the department, and then the recommendation for a cap came from the MPC in coordination with the applicant.

Speaker 5

5:52

Correct.

Speaker 7

5:53

Correct.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning████████████████████████████████32%
Procedural█████████████13%
Zoning Code Revision██████████10%
Community Engagement██████████10%
Permitting███████7%
Infrastructure███████7%
Historic Preservation██████6%
Public Transit█████5%
Transportation█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Maui County Housing and Land Use Committee Meeting – October 21, 2026

The Housing and Land Use Committee of the Maui County Council met on October 21, 2026, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:44 a.m. to consider two zoning-related bills: Bill 141 (2026) for the Maui Research & Technology Park and Bills 24 (2024) and 25 (2024) for the Lanai Project District 2 (Kōʻele). Both bills were recommended for passage on first reading with amendments. Key outcomes included votes, amendments to conditions, and extensive discussion on density reductions, infrastructure, and community concerns.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Bill 141 (2026): No oral testimony was offered; no speakers signed up.
  • Bills 24 & 25 (2024): One oral testifier commented on a financial transaction involving the owner of Lanai and submitted a document for the record. No other oral testimony was received.

Discussion Items

Bill 141 (2026) – Maui Research & Technology Park Amendments

  • Presentation: Aaron Mukai of Pacific Rim Land, Inc. presented the bill, which reallocates acreage to expand the Residential District from 102.3 to 158 acres while keeping the same number of dwelling units (capped), reduces non-residential build-up area from 2,000,000 to 1,800,000 square feet, and codifies previously approved variances. Changes also include allowing minor medical centers in the Civic District and adjusting development standards (e.g., lot sizes, setbacks). The Maui Planning Commission recommended approval with a cap on single-family large lots at 14,000 square feet and unit size limits.
  • Committee Discussion: Councilmembers questioned transit hub plans, bus stops, civic lot usage, evacuation access (via Ninao Street), and data center expansion. The applicant confirmed two bus stops under construction, a future study for a transit hub, and no current plans for the civic lots beyond one park. No concerns were raised about the density reduction.
  • Vote: Motion by Vice Chair Batangan, second by Councilmember Cook. Passed 8 ayes, 0 noes, 1 excused (Councilmember Paltin). The bill was recommended for passage on first reading with non-substantive revisions.

Bills 24 (2024) and 25 (2024) – Lanai Project District 2 (Kōʻele) Amendments

  • Presentation: Kurt Matsumoto of Pulama Lanai presented the bills, which downzone the district: 72% reduction in resort residential (from 634 to 110 units), 77% reduction in golf course acres (Cavendish golf course retained as free-play), and 1243% increase in open space/park acres. An 11.5-acre hotel expansion area is included for villa-type rooms and spa facilities. The project district is also cleaned up to align with the approved community plan and State Land Use Commission approval. The applicant requested two changes to conditions from the Lanai Planning Commission: add a time frame to condition 8 (water reporting) and remove condition 9 (bypass road triggered at 50% occupancy of units).
  • Committee Discussion: Councilmembers discussed the bypass road (condition 9), with several noting the road would impact existing homes and the trigger would never be met. Community concerns about Richardson house relocation, cemetery maintenance, and evacuation routes were addressed. The planning department supported removal of condition 9 and recommended a five-year reporting period for condition 8.
  • Amendments:
    • Condition 8: An amendment (motion by Councilmember Cook, second by Chair Lee) to insert "for a period of five years from the effective date of this ordinance" for quarterly water reports. A second amendment (motion by Councilmember Paltin, second by Councilmember Johnson) added that after five years of quarterly reports, annual reports would be required until phase 2 development begins, whichever comes sooner. This second amendment passed 6 ayes, 3 noes (Chair Lee, Cook, Sugimura opposed). The amended condition was then adopted as part of the main motion.
    • Condition 9: A separate amendment to strike condition 9 and renumber condition 10 to 9. Passed 5 ayes, 4 noes (Councilmembers Johnson, Paltin, Rollins-Fernandez, and Sinenci opposed).
  • Final Vote: Motion by Councilmember Sugimura, second by Councilmember Cook. The bills (CD1 versions) as amended were recommended for passage on first reading. Vote: 8 ayes, 1 no (Councilmember Rollins-Fernandez).

Key Outcomes

  • Bill 141 (2026): Recommended for passage on first reading (8-0-1). Next step: full County Council consideration.
  • Bills 24 (2024) and 25 (2024): Recommended for passage on first reading as CD1 versions with amendments to conditions 8 and 9 (8-1). The amendments include a sunset on water reporting (quarterly for five years, then annual until phase 2) and removal of the bypass road condition. Next step: full County Council consideration.
  • All votes and amendments were recorded and will be incorporated into the final ordinances.

Meeting Transcript

Activity in the future. Next, please. Acreage adjustments are also being made to increase residential area and reduce commercial area to match the map change as these go hand in hand. The adjustments also avoid minor minor decimal differences created by defining numbers to the thousandth decimal point. Instead, up to an at least language would be used. The overall boundary of the Maori Research and Technology Park District remains the same at about 390 acres. Next, please. The amendments also include allowing minor medical centers as a permitted use in the civic district, shown in blue on this map. Currently, larger overnight facilities are major medical centers are permitted in the civic district. The amendment would allow smaller medical facilities without overnight care, like doctor's offices and urgent care facilities. Next development standards regulate how lots and buildings are built, like lot sizes, building heights, building sizes, and setbacks. The proposed amendments incorporate more practical development standards to accommodate real-world site conditions. The amendments would remove the parking access and primary frontage requirements, adjust density and floor area ratio requirements, adjust front setback requirements, and increase maximum lot and unit sizes allowed for residential lots. As mentioned previously, a variance was secured from the board of variances and appeals, which allows most of those standards already. The code amendment codifies the variants approved. Next, please. No new zoning districts are being added, and no new permitted use categories are created. Next today, we are kindly asking the committee for its support of bill number 141. The amendments support housing needs and give flexibility in how that housing is provided. The amendments also codify the approved variants and address issues experienced with implementing the code since it was adopted. We appreciate the Maui Planning Commission's recommendation for approval and the incorporated caps to single family large lots. Thank you for your time this morning. Thank you very much for that presentation. Planning, do you folks have anything you would like to add? Good morning, Chair Ooh Hodgins and members of the committee. Um we don't have much to add. That was a very thorough presentation by Miss Mukai. Um I might be repetitive here, but just a few key points. Um, like was stated in the presentation. Some of these development standards uh were already approved via variants, and so this is just codifying some of them, which we appreciate because the department would rather see these standards be in our county code versus via variants. Um, this did go to the Maui Planning Commission. Um, there was four uh pieces of testimony that were all in support of this project. Um, and the commission was very supportive of this, and so therefore we we are also supportive of this. Thank you, Chair. Thank you very much. Um, before we go on to our discussion, do we have any other people signed up to testify on this item? Chair, there's currently no one signed up to testify. Great members saying there are no individuals wishing to testify without objection. I would now close oral testimony for this item. Thank you very much. We're gonna be implementing a three-minute question discussion. Um, so we're gonna begin with Vice Chair Batangan if you have any questions and then I'll I'll go down the line. Thank you. Thank you, Chair. Not too many questions. Uh I

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com