OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Merced, California/City Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Merced City Council, PFEDA, Parking Authority & Successor Agency Joint Meeting – September 21, 2026

City Council & Commissions — Monday, September 21, 2026
BodyMerced, California
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateMonday, September 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:47:25

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
8:25

Okay, we're good.

8:30

Good afternoon, everyone.

8:31

We'll call our study session to order.

8:35

Agenda item A, study session roll call.

8:38

Council member to Pont.

8:39

Present.

8:41

Present.

8:41

Harris.

8:42

President Smith.

8:45

May approach him boyle.

8:47

Mayor Serato.

8:48

Here.

8:49

Agenda item B study session.

8:51

B one study session to review the parks, recreation, and open space, pro as master plan.

8:58

Thank you, Chirch.

9:18

Good evening, Mr.

9:19

Mayor, um, City Council, colleagues, and community residents.

9:23

Um, Christopher Jensen here, Parks and Community Services Director for the City of Merced.

9:28

Um, we're here this evening to have a study session for the council and public to review our um proposed draft parks, recreation, and open space master plan.

9:41

Just revisit a little bit about this planning process and the use of this document for the city of Mercedes.

9:48

Uh, municipalities typically adopt updated Parks Rec open space master plans about every ten years to help uh prioritize community values, projects, programming policies, and funding initiatives.

10:09

Since that time, we've had continued growth of our University UC Cal UC California Merced, also a recession, an economic downturn, some bounce back from that, and some amazing growth over the last five years in different areas of our community.

10:27

So the need for updating our plan is vital for us.

10:31

We want to make sure that we're capturing current priorities in our community that's growing and make sure that it's addressing aged infrastructure, current programs and practices and policies, and also future growth.

10:46

In order to do that, uh we solicited outside uh funding from Central Valley Opportunity Fund.

10:54

I want to thank their representative from Opportunity Merced, Kim Gardner, who's here this evening.

10:58

Her board invested in this plan initiative, and we adopted a um a tagline of playing on purpose in MERSED through this initiative.

11:08

We hired a consultant, 110%, who subcontract subcontracted K2UA who helped do the analysis and the planning documents with our team.

11:20

The goal here is to establish the long-term vision for park developments, guiding resource allocation, ensuring effective community engagement processes along the way, and fostering a sense of place in our community.

11:35

Through our consultant, we identified a tri uh trident model of community analysis.

11:43

We did in-person community visits across our park system.

11:47

We also identified uh 12 to 15 wisdom holders who you see represented here.

11:52

These are community members that are affiliated with several organizations across our our city, and represent various perspectives and levels of involvement with parks, community services, and recreation.

12:06

We want to thank Cultiva Central Valley, Lifeline CDC, Merced Bike Coalition, Merced County Association of Realtors, County Public Health, the Garden Club, Merced Lau Family, Merced Sunrise Rotary, Merced Senior Inc., Youth Soccer, Merced Youth Soccer League, the NAACP of the County, Youth Leadership Institute, and Valley Onward.

12:32

This planning process took took approximately 18 months to date.

12:40

That timeline included over 500 total engagements with various pop-ups and events across our city for a 12-month duration.

12:49

We also did a community online survey, which uh collected over almost 1,400 responses.

12:57

And we had an open house uh last winter, I believe in February, where we had 200 members of the community attend and look at the analysis to that point and give their finalized thoughts on what priorities we should take on moving forward for our plan.

13:15

From that process, there's a lot of different perspectives in our community, all have valid uh real-lived experience that give rise to those voices, but ultimately we can only do so much as a staff and uh on your behalf.

13:30

So our goal was to really look at what are the cross-cutting issues through these various 1,400 comments, 200 plus attendees and various uh stakeholder engagements we took on.

13:42

And we came up with four priority areas.

13:44

The majority of the comments and input we received revolved around infrastructure and maintenance, representing current park infrastructure, its aging deterioration, and also um live commitments that we have to future developed parks that have not been built out yet.

14:00

We also have connected community, which represents the importance of being informed from residents to ensure our services are reflective of their goals and values and needs in the community, and also to ensure that residents know what we're doing and can access that participation.

14:17

Safety and inclusion represents providing welcoming, inclusive, and safe services for all.

14:23

This isn't just about our relationship with our first responders and public safety, uh, which it very much is part of this, but it's also the fact that we want to make sure if we are not providing services in a manner that allows certain groups of our community to access them, we need to take a look at that and modify either our outreach, our programming, um, or who we have uh providing services.

14:47

Resources and stewardship represents the fact that we have a unique set of skills in parks and community services.

14:53

We have limited resources, but we have an abundance of community stakeholders that want to participate.

15:00

One of the things we heard from 110% consultants was how much community feedback and input they got in a town this size.

15:07

They were really blown away by the level of community engagement and the willingness of our residents to step up and be a part of the solution moving forward.

15:19

So this evening, um, about a month ago, we two months ago, excuse me, we presented the the PROS plan in its uh draft form to this council.

15:28

We did a high-level overview.

15:30

There is a lot of detail involved with this plan, including all of the different objectives that fall into the four pillars that we talked about just a second ago.

15:39

Some of the council members asked for a more uh robust review of these objectives and wanted some consideration of fine-tuning some of the language that suggested certain roles and responsibilities for our staff moving forward.

15:54

In that 60-day period, we took the plan back to our parks and recreation commission for a final review with them.

16:01

They did a fantastic job.

16:02

I think we might have set the record for a parks commission meeting.

16:06

Um we we we went over four hours.

16:09

Um I think they're aspiring city council members.

16:13

Um, and they did a really good job to heed what council comments were from their initial from your initial review and really give their own input on it to make sure that this is a plan that they're not only aware of but feel a part of and willing to take ownership moving forward.

16:30

So the first area that we reviewed with our commission was infrastructure and maintenance.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parks and Recreation█████████████████████████25%
Procedural█████████████13%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Public Health Awareness███████7%
Community Development Block Grant███████7%
Public Works█████5%
Animal Welfare█████5%
Urban Planning█████5%
City Council Operations████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Merced City Council, PFEDA, Parking Authority & Successor Agency Joint Meeting – September 21, 2026

The City of Merced City Council met jointly as the Public Financing and Economic Development Authority (PFEDA), the Parking Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency on Monday, September 21, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chamber at the Merced Civic Center, 678 W. 18th Street, Merced, CA. A study session began at 4:00 PM, closed session at 5:00 PM, and the regular meeting at 6:00 PM. The primary topics were a study session on the draft Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan, a large consent calendar, several public comments, a council discussion on the structure of city boards and commissions, and a proclamation for Constitution Week. Spanish and Hmong translation services were available at the meeting.

Study Session: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan (Item A/B)

  • Staff presented a review of the draft Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. The draft report was available in person and online, and translation services (English, Spanish, and Hmong) were available at every engagement effort and at the meeting itself.
  • Staff acknowledged the initial use of the term "key informant" was "very off-putting" to some community members, so the engagement approach was adjusted. Community members were invited to map assets and areas to preserve during the January 28 workshop, and the public comment period for the vision statement remained open about two months, closing in August.
  • The plan's vision statement was drafted as a four-paragraph statement based on community feedback. Staff offered two options: return to council with a refined vision statement, or finalize the vision statement at the staff level.
  • Staff highlighted goal 1.8 of the plan: "position the sports complex as a revenue-generating regional asset."
  • Staff described the need for a walking path from M Street to R Street within the regional park, plus parking areas and walkable spaces so community members could be dropped off on M Street and reach all dedicated acres of the park.
  • Staff stated that community members' "tribal knowledge"—institutional knowledge held by long-time city staff—should be documented and become "traditional," regulated, and monitored over time.
  • Staff emphasized that the city should provide unique, affordable services and "not just replicating the services of others." For community members who are not financially stable, staff said the city should survey the field to offer attainable services.
  • Staff noted the recreation fee schedule has not been standardized, and adopting the plan would direct staff to bring an updated fee schedule every two years based on current expenses.
  • Staff stressed that parkland dedicated through development and annexation should be usable open space, particularly given the city's significant flood zone and floodplain, and that the city should work with development partners on this issue.
  • Staff noted the city has acquired tools for routine maintenance at the park facility, but not for the major overhaul the facility requires.
  • Councilmembers offered no proposed edits or motions to the plan; they expressed looking forward to the next steps. No registered speakers signed up for this item.

Ceremonial Items

  • Council issued a proclamation recognizing Constitution Week. A speaker (appearing to represent a state or county office) noted ongoing work on local investments, micro-farming projects where farmers do not own their land, and assistance to constituents calling about unemployment, disability, and Franchise Tax Board matters. The speaker expressed gratitude for the partnership with the city.

Consent Calendar

  • Council considered the Consent Calendar (agenda item L). No items were pulled for separate consideration, and no registered speakers were present for the consent calendar.
  • Council adopted a motion approving the consent calendar, which included:
    • Approval of the City Council/Public Financing and Economic Redevelopment Agency meeting minutes of December 15, 2025.
    • Adoption of Resolution 2026-62, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Merced, California, rescinding Resolution 2024-87 and updating the city's conflict of interest code.
    • A resolution extending an expiration date from September 30, 2026, to June 30, 2027.
    • Approval of a first amendment with the California Public Policy Group.
  • The motion passed unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • The Clerk's office received emails from Patricia Pratt regarding item K1 public comment before the 1:00 PM deadline; the emails were distributed to council and posted on the city's website.
  • One remote speaker, Norma C., was registered during public comment; no other remote speakers were registered.
  • A speaker reminded the council that "there are people who don't want to use cars," urging consideration of non-car access.
  • A speaker stated that at the previous commission meeting—whose minutes had not yet been posted—many commission members said they need to meet monthly.
  • A speaker announced that the city would host the California Arts Council (the state agency that designated the downtown as a cultural district) for their council meeting on Friday, October 23rd from 10:00 AM.
  • A speaker emphasized the importance of collaboration between the city and other entities on floodwater management, noting that "floodwaters don't care about jurisdictional boundaries."

Discussion Items

  • Under agenda item O (Business), Council discussed the structure, goals, and priorities of the city's boards and commissions. A councilmember requested the item be added to the agenda after the July appointment process. The discussion noted that commissions and committees may need to "rework" their goals and priorities and define the support they provide to the community. The councilmember suggested limiting items to sort through first and questioned the 4:00 PM every-other-Monday meeting schedule. No specific proposal was finalized during the discussion.

Report Out of Closed Session

  • The City Council reported that there was no reportable action from closed session (agenda item G).

Key Outcomes

  • The Consent Calendar was approved unanimously, including Resolution 2026-62 (rescinding Resolution 2024-87 and updating the conflict of interest code), the December 15, 2025 meeting minutes, the expiration date extension to June 30, 2027, and the first amendment with California Public Policy Group.
  • Council provided no formal direction on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; staff will proceed with next steps, which could include returning with a refined vision statement or finalizing the vision statement at the staff level.
  • The discussion on boards and commissions produced no formal action; council direction remains open-ended.
  • No reportable action resulted from closed session.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, we're good. Good afternoon, everyone. We'll call our study session to order. Agenda item A, study session roll call. Council member to Pont. Present. Present. Harris. President Smith. May approach him boyle. Mayor Serato. Here. Agenda item B study session. B one study session to review the parks, recreation, and open space, pro as master plan. Thank you, Chirch. Good evening, Mr. Mayor, um, City Council, colleagues, and community residents. Um, Christopher Jensen here, Parks and Community Services Director for the City of Merced. Um, we're here this evening to have a study session for the council and public to review our um proposed draft parks, recreation, and open space master plan. Just revisit a little bit about this planning process and the use of this document for the city of Mercedes. Uh, municipalities typically adopt updated Parks Rec open space master plans about every ten years to help uh prioritize community values, projects, programming policies, and funding initiatives. Since that time, we've had continued growth of our University UC Cal UC California Merced, also a recession, an economic downturn, some bounce back from that, and some amazing growth over the last five years in different areas of our community. So the need for updating our plan is vital for us. We want to make sure that we're capturing current priorities in our community that's growing and make sure that it's addressing aged infrastructure, current programs and practices and policies, and also future growth. In order to do that, uh we solicited outside uh funding from Central Valley Opportunity Fund. I want to thank their representative from Opportunity Merced, Kim Gardner, who's here this evening. Her board invested in this plan initiative, and we adopted a um a tagline of playing on purpose in MERSED through this initiative. We hired a consultant, 110%, who subcontract subcontracted K2UA who helped do the analysis and the planning documents with our team. The goal here is to establish the long-term vision for park developments, guiding resource allocation, ensuring effective community engagement processes along the way, and fostering a sense of place in our community. Through our consultant, we identified a tri uh trident model of community analysis. We did in-person community visits across our park system. We also identified uh 12 to 15 wisdom holders who you see represented here. These are community members that are affiliated with several organizations across our our city, and represent various perspectives and levels of involvement with parks, community services, and recreation. We want to thank Cultiva Central Valley, Lifeline CDC, Merced Bike Coalition, Merced County Association of Realtors, County Public Health, the Garden Club, Merced Lau Family, Merced Sunrise Rotary, Merced Senior Inc., Youth Soccer, Merced Youth Soccer League, the NAACP of the County, Youth Leadership Institute, and Valley Onward. This planning process took took approximately 18 months to date. That timeline included over 500 total engagements with various pop-ups and events across our city for a 12-month duration. We also did a community online survey, which uh collected over almost 1,400 responses. And we had an open house uh last winter, I believe in February, where we had 200 members of the community attend and look at the analysis to that point and give their finalized thoughts on what priorities we should take on moving forward for our plan. From that process, there's a lot of different perspectives in our community, all have valid uh real-lived experience that give rise to those voices, but ultimately we can only do so much as a staff and uh on your behalf. So our goal was to really look at what are the cross-cutting issues through these various 1,400 comments, 200 plus attendees and various uh stakeholder engagements we took on. And we came up with four priority areas. The majority of the comments and input we received revolved around infrastructure and maintenance, representing current park infrastructure, its aging deterioration, and also um live commitments that we have to future developed parks that have not been built out yet. We also have connected community, which represents the importance of being informed from residents to ensure our services are reflective of their goals and values and needs in the community, and also to ensure that residents know what we're doing and can access that participation. Safety and inclusion represents providing welcoming, inclusive, and safe services for all. This isn't just about our relationship with our first responders and public safety, uh, which it very much is part of this, but it's also the fact that we want to make sure if we are not providing services in a manner that allows certain groups of our community to access them, we need to take a look at that and modify either our outreach, our programming, um, or who we have uh providing services. Resources and stewardship represents the fact that we have a unique set of skills in parks and community services. We have limited resources, but we have an abundance of community stakeholders that want to participate. One of the things we heard from 110% consultants was how much community feedback and input they got in a town this size. They were really blown away by the level of community engagement and the willingness of our residents to step up and be a part of the solution moving forward. So this evening, um, about a month ago, we two months ago, excuse me, we presented the the PROS plan in its uh draft form to this council.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com