OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Miami, Florida/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of Miami Code Enforcement Board Meeting - October 14, 2026

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodyMiami, Florida
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:53:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

3:13

Like

Speaker 1

3:13

that.

3:14

So after the pleasure, just please continue to stand, okay?

Unassigned speaker

3:22

No.

Speaker 1

3:31

Until you just stand to be sworn in.

3:35

Continue to stand to be sworn in.

Unassigned speaker

3:40

Do

Speaker 2

3:41

you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Unassigned speaker

3:51

Do

Speaker 2

3:51

you solemnly swear or affirm that the test?

3:53

I mean, you translate from English to Spanish and Spanish to English, the best of your ability.

4:30

English to the best of your ability.

4:32

Thank you.

Speaker 1

4:35

Question.

4:36

Oh, go ahead, sorry.

Speaker 3

4:39

Bonsoir.

4:42

Yeah.

4:47

No?

Speaker 1

4:47

Yes.

4:50

Board attorney.

4:54

Question question for you.

4:55

Do we do we need to um make a motion for the excuse absence for the new board member?

5:05

That hasn't.

5:07

Board member Gomez.

Speaker 4

5:10

No, I mean, as long as you have a quorum, you're

Speaker 1

5:12

ready to go.

5:13

Yeah, I just know I know she's been on the roll since last meeting, so

Unassigned speaker

5:19

just

Speaker 1

5:20

wonder if she may have reached out and asked for an excused absence or something.

Speaker 5

5:24

Yes.

Speaker 1

5:27

Yes.

5:27

She actually reached out for it now.

5:29

She's here.

5:30

Okay.

5:31

So

Speaker 6

5:31

yeah, we're requesting an excuse absence because there's just uh a particular issue that needs to be um checked on.

Speaker 4

5:37

Oh, okay.

5:38

Then it's not just a regular absence.

5:40

Okay.

Speaker 6

5:40

Right, yeah, it should be.

5:42

Yeah, we're yeah, on her behalf, we're requesting to be excused.

5:45

She's newly appointed, but given what her outside job is, in terms of also some reporting requirements, she needs to make sure with somebody else whether or not that might be a conflict.

5:59

So before she takes the podium with you all, she wants to make sure that she's in good stead, which I think makes a lot of sense.

6:05

Got

Speaker 4

6:05

it.

6:06

Okay, but they don't need to vote on that.

Speaker 6

6:10

I would just say an abundance of caution.

6:12

We all know that it's excused.

6:14

She hasn't,

Unassigned speaker

6:15

you

Speaker 6

6:15

know, she's already been appointed to the board.

6:17

She just hasn't taken the podium yet,

Unassigned speaker

6:20

but you

Speaker 1

6:21

know.

6:22

If it's not a big deal, I'll just say

Speaker 4

6:23

if you want to in an abundance of caution, you can.

6:25

I don't, I don't think it's I mean, otherwise, she would just not be

Unassigned speaker

6:29

here

Speaker 4

6:29

if it were any other day.

6:31

So, but if you if you want to vote, it's just she's just not

Summary of Proceedings

City of Miami Code Enforcement Board Meeting - October 14, 2026

The City of Miami Code Enforcement Board convened on October 14, 2026, to hear a heavy docket of cases. The meeting covered fine mitigations, extensions of time, contested hearings, and absentia rulings. The board attorney read standard procedures in English, Spanish, and Creole. A quorum was present, and an excused absence was granted to newly appointed board member Gomez to allow a conflict of interest review. The board briefly addressed a streaming issue with channel 77.

Mitigation Cases

  • 2946 SW 34th Ave (Attorney John A. Guschiza): The owners were victimized by contractors and one child needed a kidney transplant. The lien of $394,000 was reduced to $5,000.
  • 7929 NE 1st Ave (Ali Givenkow, Liz Licky Viljum): The $184,000 lien for operating without a Business Tax Receipt was reduced to the commercial minimum of $15,000.
  • 3174 SW 25th St (Represented by Norris Crew): A homestead property. The $87,500 lien was reduced to $0 via unanimous vote.
  • 1449 NW 68th Terrace (Owner Mike Venidale): The property was burned down by a squatter and demolished by the city. The $115,000 lien was reduced to $7,500, contingent on paying a $12,532 demolition lien for the same property within 60 days. A separate $44,831 demolition debt on another property was discussed but not included in the condition.
  • 1595 NW 60th St (Owner Kenya Sanchez): A commercial lot cited for work without a permit. The $41,750 lien was reduced to the 20% minimum of $8,350. The owner's request to recalculate the fine from an earlier date was denied as outside the board's authority.
  • 604 NW 25th Ave (Elizabeth Akai, by Power of Attorney): An Adult Living Facility. The $755,000 lien was reduced to $0 via unanimous vote.

Extensions of Time

  • 2130 SW 19th Terrace: Granted 120 days due to contractor abandonment.
  • 2148 NW 17th Ave: Granted 120 days after tenants were evicted and severely damaged the property.
  • 1900 NW 35th St (Attorney Maria Danay): Granted 120 days to resolve a complex unity of title issue with the city before permitting can proceed.

Contested Hearings (To Be Heards)

  • 106 NW 80th St (Attorney Mickey Barrero): Two cases for tree removal, fence, and debris. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 170 NW 57th St (Maria Morello): Vacant lot with storage and an RV used as a residence (since removed). Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 1045 NE 84th St (Owner Pedro Aparicio): Tree removal without a permit. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem.
  • 620/610 NE 87th St (Owner): Three tree removal tickets. Pleaded not guilty. Owner stated under oath he never removed any trees from the vacant lot. The board found the property guilty because the ticket was not timely appealed and no after-the-fact permit was pulled. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 1236 NW 31st St (Angie Garcia, property manager): Work without a permit, in the permitting process. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem.
  • 428 NW 10th Ave (Gary and mother Estina): Outside storage and unpermitted fence for a junk removal business. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 1063 NW 55th Terrace (Owner Hans Duran): Work without a permit for a fence and window enclosure. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem.
  • 1581 NW 55th Terrace (Owner George Pratt): Two cases (tree removal, work w/o permit). One case was voided, the other pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem.
  • 161 NW 35th St (Gwendolyn Ferraro with Power of Attorney for Ricardo Seed): Unlicensed short-term rental. Pleaded guilty. Owner stated unit was uninhabitable, but inspector found it still listed. Granted 30 days to remove listings and provide inspector access, $250/day per diem.
  • 1480 NW 59th St (Owners John Palacio, Gwendolyn Ferraro): Work without a permit for fence, pavers, and storage. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem.
  • 735 NW 55th St (Carla Latino, via interpreter): Cutting trees without a permit. Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 1625 SW 19th Terrace (Owner Jose Lascano): Pleaded not guilty to having an RV and a boat on a T3 zoned single-family lot. The owner argued a prior inspector allowed it and cited city code. The city attorney clarified Miami 21 code (Sections 5.3.5 and 3.6.3) prohibits temporary structures like RVs in T3 zones. The board found the property guilty. The boat can remain with screening, but the RV must be removed. Granted 120 days, $150/day per diem. The owner was advised of his right to appeal to the 11th Judicial Circuit Court.
  • 1330 NW 56th St (Owners Jahima Fumero and Jesus Diaz): Work without a permit (kitchen/bath conversion discovered during inspection). Pleaded guilty. Granted 120 days, $250/day per diem.
  • 1265 NW 35th St (Owner Emilio Bruscantini): Vacant lot with chickens, trash, and barbed wire. Pleaded guilty. Owner humorously noted chickens were from a neighbor. Granted 90 days, $250/day per diem.

Absentia Hearings

The board heard multiple cases where no respondent appeared. Standard compliance deadlines of 3 to 90 days were set, with per diem fines of $150 or $250 depending on property type. Notable cases included:

  • 1700 NW 63rd St: Property cited as a repeat violator for outside storage. Found guilty, 3 days to comply, $250/day per diem.
  • 2527 NW 13th Ave: Property with severe blight and trash. Found guilty, 3 days to comply, $150/day per diem.
  • 813 NW 29th St: A speaker attempted to represent the owner without a Power of Attorney. Property found guilty, granted 30 days to comply, $150/day per diem.
  • 1121 NW 56th St: Permits were mostly done (missing final inspections). Found guilty, granted 90 days, $150/day per diem.

Key Outcomes

The board successfully adjudicated a very large docket. Significant fine mitigations were granted based on homeowner hardships and compliance efforts. The board strictly applied the city code in contested cases, notably upholding an RV prohibition in a T3 zone. Several properties were found in compliance and closed. The meeting concluded around 7:50 PM and the board adopted the 2027 meeting schedule.

Meeting Transcript

Like that. So after the pleasure, just please continue to stand, okay? No. Until you just stand to be sworn in. Continue to stand to be sworn in. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the test? I mean, you translate from English to Spanish and Spanish to English, the best of your ability. English to the best of your ability. Thank you. Question. Oh, go ahead, sorry. Bonsoir. Yeah. No? Yes. Board attorney. Question question for you. Do we do we need to um make a motion for the excuse absence for the new board member? That hasn't. Board member Gomez. No, I mean, as long as you have a quorum, you're ready to go. Yeah, I just know I know she's been on the roll since last meeting, so just wonder if she may have reached out and asked for an excused absence or something. Yes. Yes. She actually reached out for it now. She's here. Okay. So yeah, we're requesting an excuse absence because there's just uh a particular issue that needs to be um checked on. Oh, okay. Then it's not just a regular absence. Okay. Right, yeah, it should be. Yeah, we're yeah, on her behalf, we're requesting to be excused. She's newly appointed, but given what her outside job is, in terms of also some reporting requirements, she needs to make sure with somebody else whether or not that might be a conflict. So before she takes the podium with you all, she wants to make sure that she's in good stead, which I think makes a lot of sense. Got it. Okay, but they don't need to vote on that. I would just say an abundance of caution. We all know that it's excused. She hasn't, you

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com