OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Middletown, Connecticut/Common Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Middletown Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - October 14, 2026

Common Council & Commissions — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodyMiddletown, Connecticut
SessionCommon Council & Commissions
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 59:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

1:09

This webinar is being transcribed and summarized.

Speaker 2

1:36

Roll call.

1:37

Chair Tom Badavina.

1:38

Present.

1:39

Vice Chair Tyler Extram.

1:41

Present.

1:42

Secretary Nathaniel Spencer is present.

1:45

Members Elizabeth Emory.

Speaker 3

1:47

Present.

Speaker 2

1:47

Morgan Monarka.

1:50

Andrew Regan.

1:52

Vinny Sinkowitz.

1:54

Present.

1:54

Alternates Alan Cunningham.

Unassigned speaker

1:56

Present.

Speaker 2

1:57

Emily McAvoy.

Unassigned speaker

1:58

Present.

Speaker 2

2:01

That is the role.

Speaker 4

2:02

Commissioner McFoy will be seated for Commissioner Monarco.

Speaker 2

2:07

Item number three, items

Speaker 5

2:09

removed from the agenda.

2:11

Let's see.

2:12

Under the public hearing, item six point three has been postponed by the applicant to the December meeting.

Speaker 2

2:29

Thank you.

2:30

Item four, public comment on items on the agenda which are not scheduled for a public hearing.

2:35

Everything on the agenda is scheduled for a public hearing tonight.

2:38

Item five, confirmation that all hearing signs have been properly posted.

Speaker 5

2:46

Yes.

2:55

So item 6.1 was continued from the last public hearing.

3:43

So there was very much intent to comply with the regulation.

3:48

But when we recognize that there was an issue, um they fixed as as quickly as they could.

3:55

So I just want to share that with

Unassigned speaker

3:56

you.

Speaker 5

3:57

Other than that, we're all good.

Speaker 4

3:59

Okay.

3:59

I am not comfortable holding that meeting if the public wasn't properly noticed notified.

4:05

So what does the commission feel on this?

Speaker 2

4:11

Um are we within the the window for a um special exception?

Speaker 5

4:20

Yeah, so um so the since the the public hearing was opened um at the last meeting on October Sorry, September or whatever date that was.

4:31

Um the public hearing has to be um closed within 30 days 35 days of the opening of it.

4:38

So um that means um the commission would have to close the public hearing tonight unless the applicant were to grant an extension of time to the December meeting.

Speaker 4

4:49

Is the applicant present?

4:51

I've never met the

Speaker 5

4:52

applicant.

Unassigned speaker

4:57

Is anybody here to speak for uh six seventy-two East Main Street?

Unassigned speaker

5:03

I'll intertain a motion to close the public hearing.

Speaker 4

5:06

So moved.

Unassigned speaker

5:06

Oh,

Speaker 2

5:07

you want to read it and please uh Sir Um Item 6.1 continue to request for special exception and site plan approval for the construction of a two-family dwelling at 672 East Main Street lot B in the RPZ zone, applicant agent, capritus, uh OD SK Ventures, LLC, SEU 2026-17.

Unassigned speaker

5:31

I

Speaker 2

5:31

think the applicant might have arrived.

Unassigned speaker

5:33

Oh

Speaker 5

5:34

no, are you are you here for East Main Street?

Unassigned speaker

5:41

Uh

Speaker 5

5:42

no.

5:43

Oh no, no, no.

5:44

Okay, sorry.

5:45

Okay, so

Speaker 4

5:46

the applicant is not

Unassigned speaker

5:47

here.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations████████████████████████████████████████40%
Procedural██████████████████████████████████34%
Water And Wastewater Management██████████10%
Economic Development██████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Floodplain Management██2%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Middletown Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting - October 14, 2026

The Middletown Planning and Zoning Commission convened its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers and virtually via WebEx. Acting Chair Thom Pattavina presided. The meeting covered a deferred public hearing, a new special exception, a zoning map amendment, regional planning reports, and updates on litigation.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 6.1 - 672 East Main Street (Two-Family Dwelling): Applicant Gurpreet Oberoi (appearing online during this portion) argued the sign posting lapse was due to late notification from the town and requested a conditional approval. The Chair and Director stated compliance is the applicant's sole responsibility.
  • Item 6.2 - 388 Main Street (Physical Fitness Facility): Applicant Kiara Narro Vela described the proposed Pilates, Yoga, and Barre studio.
  • Item 6.4 - 660 & 668 South Main Street (Zoning Map Amendment): Tom Clayton (195 Farm Hill Road) and Ed Geek raised flooding and stormwater concerns related to Long Hill Brook. Geek also asked about wildlife and tree clearing impacts.

Discussion Items

  • Item 6.2 - 388 Main Street: Director Kozikowski confirmed the 552 sq ft use requires a special exception in B-1. Commissioners Nathaniel Spencer and Tyler Eckstrom expressed strong support for the proposal as a health-oriented addition to Main Street.
  • Item 6.4 - 660 & 668 South Main Street: The commission deliberated on the zone change application by Luke Morrow representing J&J Middletown, LLC.
    • The applicant argued the B-2 to MXI change would allow multifamily residential units (10–25) on the rear of the 7.4-acre Chevy dealership property while enabling dealership renovation, consistent with the POCD and precedent set by other smaller MXI parcels.
    • Commissioners extensively questioned floodplain issues, soil conditions, ecological impacts, and traffic. The applicant committed to a comprehensive flood study.
    • Commissioners Spencer, Eckstrom, and Emily McEvoy expressed general support, noting the zone change itself does not authorize development and all future proposals must return to the commission.
  • Item 8.1 - Bysiewicz Drive Industrial Building (Deferred): A site plan application for a new 15,000 SF industrial building was postponed by the applicant.
  • RiverCOG Report: Commissioner Emery reported on regional concerns over protecting industrial land from new housing zoning costs. Commissioner Vinny Szynkowicz agreed, stating the city is ahead of its housing percentage goals.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 6.1 (672 East Main Street): Hearing closed due to public notice deficiency (8 days vs 10). Decision deferred to December 2026. Applicant to work with staff for proper re-noticing.
  • Item 6.2 (388 Main Street): Motion passed unanimously. Special exception approved for physical fitness facility.
  • Item 6.4 (660 & 668 South Main Street): Motion passed. Zoning map amendment from B-2 to MXI approved. Future site plans require separate applications.
  • Minutes: Minutes of September 23, 2026 regular meeting approved.
  • Appeals: Director Kozikowski reported two appeals received (797 Washington Street and Sand Hill/East Main Street subdivision), with two more expected. He thanked staff for preparing records and noted the financial strain on the land use budget for producing transcripts required for the appeals.

Adjournment

  • The meeting was adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

This webinar is being transcribed and summarized. Roll call. Chair Tom Badavina. Present. Vice Chair Tyler Extram. Present. Secretary Nathaniel Spencer is present. Members Elizabeth Emory. Present. Morgan Monarka. Andrew Regan. Vinny Sinkowitz. Present. Alternates Alan Cunningham. Present. Emily McAvoy. Present. That is the role. Commissioner McFoy will be seated for Commissioner Monarco. Item number three, items removed from the agenda. Let's see. Under the public hearing, item six point three has been postponed by the applicant to the December meeting. Thank you. Item four, public comment on items on the agenda which are not scheduled for a public hearing. Everything on the agenda is scheduled for a public hearing tonight. Item five, confirmation that all hearing signs have been properly posted. Yes. So item 6.1 was continued from the last public hearing. So there was very much intent to comply with the regulation. But when we recognize that there was an issue, um they fixed as as quickly as they could. So I just want to share that with you. Other than that, we're all good. Okay. I am not comfortable holding that meeting if the public wasn't properly noticed notified. So what does the commission feel on this? Um are we within the the window for a um special exception? Yeah, so um so the since the the public hearing was opened um at the last meeting on October Sorry, September or whatever date that was. Um the public hearing has to be um closed within 30 days 35 days of the opening of it. So um that means um the commission would have to close the public hearing tonight unless the applicant were to grant an extension of time to the December meeting. Is the applicant present? I've never met the applicant. Is anybody here to speak for uh six seventy-two East Main Street? I'll intertain a motion to close the public hearing. So moved. Oh, you want to read it and please uh Sir Um Item 6.1 continue to request for special exception and site plan approval for the construction of a two-family dwelling at 672 East Main Street lot B in the RPZ zone, applicant agent, capritus, uh OD SK Ventures, LLC, SEU 2026-17. I

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com