OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milwaukie, Oregon/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milwaukie City Council Meeting - September 15, 2026: Mini Storage Ban, Revolving Loan Fund, and Solid Waste Franchise

City Council — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyMilwaukie, Oregon
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:02:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
5:00

Pass uh code for the M zone and the VI zone uh the code fix package code update.

5:04

There was something I meant to bring up that night.

5:06

I totally spaced it.

5:08

Um but I wanted to see how it lands with you guys.

5:12

Uh and if it's if it if people are generally supportive, we can ask staff to work it into the next sort of code fix package, which is banning mini storage.

5:25

I feel like um mini storage, we have quite a bit in Milwaukee.

5:31

We have a whole lot just on the very edge of Milwaukee.

5:35

It's a very low job producer, it is not um you know creating jobs for people in our uh in our employment areas.

5:46

So I would like to see us not allow more mini storage, and I wanted to see what you guys think on that.

5:54

I gotta tell you, I this was not on my radar at all until I read those articles.

6:00

Yeah, and uh, but it you know, a lot of it makes sense.

6:04

Um I guess my question is it's kind of like you know, the old ad if you never say never, you know.

6:16

And uh so and I don't know about the you know uh potential uh legal pushback we might get from the mini storage association or whatever they might be.

6:29

And so um I mean there might be uh a way to achieve a thing without going at all and a moratorium.

6:40

Well, yeah, I mean it wouldn't affect existing ones.

6:43

It wouldn't affect the code.

6:44

I just like moratorium for data center and then a moratorium for storage uh facilities.

6:50

What's the point about that?

6:51

I like it.

6:52

It's uh it's a lot of moratoriums, it's funny.

6:55

Well, I think that you you might be able to avoid some uh potential legal issues.

6:59

I don't know.

7:00

Well, I mean I think it could be handled a couple of different ways.

7:03

It could be uh we could get an N for no not allowed in the zone.

7:09

It could also be a conditional use, and we could you know not say outright no, but that you have to jump through some more hoops and maybe put some you know put a heavy thing heavy hand on the scale for the positional use.

7:25

Um yeah, I mean are yours by moratorium you mean like a freeze or certainly freeze for a fixed number of years.

7:43

Welcome.

7:44

Hi so the issue is the I had sent an email around after the last meeting because I'd forgotten to bring it up when we were doing the business code, but I think we should um prohibit mini storages because I think they're very low employment generators, and we have plenty of them.

8:07

Thank you.

8:09

I just weren't sticking.

8:14

Can you prohibit them before the next month of rent is too?

8:23

So I know when I was looking at data center policy and what other cities had to go through, you have to reach out to DLCD and give 45-day notice and have some like findings about why you're restricting uses.

8:36

Is that something we'd have to do here?

8:38

Like for data centers at least, you had to like have a showing of fact about why you're prohibiting data centers.

8:43

I don't think we have to do that.

8:44

We I mean we've made some pretty significant changes in what was allowed and not we have disallowed schools, right?

8:50

Yeah.

8:51

Um As I understand it, yeah, it's to you disallowed screeners.

8:56

Yes.

9:01

You voted on it.

9:02

Where was this?

9:06

In the business industrial zone.

9:08

Oh, oh, okay.

9:09

Oh, yeah, and that okay.

9:11

We didn't ban schools.

9:12

See.

9:16

Yeah.

9:16

We definitely remembered that one.

9:34

So what do people think?

9:38

And we don't have to decide this now, but it was just uh uh I was filling time till Adam got eight.

9:50

Those those store sites are important for certain businesses.

9:54

Well, true.

10:00

Um and I'm not necessarily advocating for storage sites because I think that especially those that that sprawl out, you know, I know that those are more cost effective to build.

10:09

I appreciate the ones, well, I don't appreciate lugging things upstairs, but I appreciate the ones that take up less um property.

10:18

Um there are not a lot of employees that are generated on those sites.

10:23

Um but I would say as a business owner who does use storage off site, um they are um any theft or um incidences that occur on those properties within the city of Milwaukee are investigated by Milwaukee police, which is much appreciated because that does not happen in other cities or unincorporated areas.

10:46

Yeah.

10:49

So I don't know.

10:51

I mean, is is it like either allow or prohibit, or is there something in the middle that encourages the the like uh uh yeah, conditional use that would uh require certain height, yeah, like multi-story.

11:07

Yeah, yeah.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████████████33%
Waste Management████████████████████████████████32%
Public Contracting████████████12%
Zoning Code Amendments███████7%
Budget Equity Analysis███████7%
Public Safety███3%
Public Engagement███3%
Land Acquisition Strategy█1%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Milwaukie City Council Meeting - September 15, 2026

The Milwaukie City Council met on September 15, 2026, to discuss a potential ban on new mini storage facilities, consider a revolving loan fund for homeownership, and review the solid waste franchise system. Council also set direction for staff on several items, including allocating $300,000 for a pilot homeownership assistance program and forming a subcommittee to negotiate a new franchise agreement with haulers.

Discussion Items

Mini Storage Ban

  • Councilmember raised the idea of prohibiting new mini storage facilities in the M and VI zones, citing low job creation and existing abundance in Milwaukie. Council discussed options including outright prohibition, conditional use permits, or moratoriums. Concerns about legal challenges and unintended consequences (e.g., rent increases) were noted. Some members favored multi-story storage as a compromise. Council agreed to have staff include the topic in the next code fix package for further analysis.

Revolving Loan Fund for Homeownership

  • Staff presented a proposal for a revolving loan fund to assist Milwaukie residents with homeownership, aligned with the Housing Production Strategy. Options from two vendors (Network of Oregon Affordable Housing and Dev Northwest) were reviewed. Council discussed eligibility criteria: income (preference for 80% AMI with flexibility up to 100%), residency requirement (six months), and flexibility for first-time or repeat buyers. Council directed staff to issue an RFP and allocated up to $300,000 from CET funds for a pilot program, with the expectation that vendors bring forward specific products (e.g., down payment assistance, mortgage rate buy-down). The program aims to support as many applicants as possible, with a maximum per-applicant amount to be determined based on vendor proposals.

Solid Waste Franchise System Amendment

  • Finance Director Michael Osborne presented options for the solid waste franchise agreement, which currently has a 10-year rolling term set to end January 1, 2035. Haulers (Waste Management and Waste Connections) and Clackamas County Solid Waste representative Rick Winterhalter discussed the need for longer-term certainty to justify capital investments (e.g., trucks costing $450,000–$800,000). Council considered a shorter fixed or rolling term (e.g., 7 years) and whether to maintain multiple haulers or consolidate. Council decided to form a subcommittee of two councilors to work with haulers and staff to develop a new franchise agreement, aiming to bring a recommendation by spring 2027 (aligning with annual rate setting). The subcommittee will explore provisions that provide investment certainty without a 10-year rolling commitment.

Key Outcomes

  • Mini Storage: Staff directed to include mini storage regulation options in the next code fix package.
  • Revolving Loan Fund: Council approved moving forward with an RFP for a homeownership assistance program, allocating $300,000 from CET funds. Key parameters: income target 80–100% AMI, six-month residency requirement, flexibility for first-time and repeat buyers, and preference for vendors offering additional leveraged funds.
  • Solid Waste Franchise: Council authorized formation of a two-member subcommittee to negotiate a new franchise agreement with existing haulers, with a target to present a draft to the full council in spring 2027. The subcommittee will focus on a shorter term (e.g., 7-year rolling) and provisions to support hauler investment.
  • General: Mayor committed to ending meetings promptly at 6:00 p.m. for a Historic Milwaukie event at Scott Park.

Meeting Transcript

Pass uh code for the M zone and the VI zone uh the code fix package code update. There was something I meant to bring up that night. I totally spaced it. Um but I wanted to see how it lands with you guys. Uh and if it's if it if people are generally supportive, we can ask staff to work it into the next sort of code fix package, which is banning mini storage. I feel like um mini storage, we have quite a bit in Milwaukee. We have a whole lot just on the very edge of Milwaukee. It's a very low job producer, it is not um you know creating jobs for people in our uh in our employment areas. So I would like to see us not allow more mini storage, and I wanted to see what you guys think on that. I gotta tell you, I this was not on my radar at all until I read those articles. Yeah, and uh, but it you know, a lot of it makes sense. Um I guess my question is it's kind of like you know, the old ad if you never say never, you know. And uh so and I don't know about the you know uh potential uh legal pushback we might get from the mini storage association or whatever they might be. And so um I mean there might be uh a way to achieve a thing without going at all and a moratorium. Well, yeah, I mean it wouldn't affect existing ones. It wouldn't affect the code. I just like moratorium for data center and then a moratorium for storage uh facilities. What's the point about that? I like it. It's uh it's a lot of moratoriums, it's funny. Well, I think that you you might be able to avoid some uh potential legal issues. I don't know. Well, I mean I think it could be handled a couple of different ways. It could be uh we could get an N for no not allowed in the zone. It could also be a conditional use, and we could you know not say outright no, but that you have to jump through some more hoops and maybe put some you know put a heavy thing heavy hand on the scale for the positional use. Um yeah, I mean are yours by moratorium you mean like a freeze or certainly freeze for a fixed number of years. Welcome. Hi so the issue is the I had sent an email around after the last meeting because I'd forgotten to bring it up when we were doing the business code, but I think we should um prohibit mini storages because I think they're very low employment generators, and we have plenty of them. Thank you. I just weren't sticking. Can you prohibit them before the next month of rent is too? So I know when I was looking at data center policy and what other cities had to go through, you have to reach out to DLCD and give 45-day notice and have some like findings about why you're restricting uses. Is that something we'd have to do here? Like for data centers at least, you had to like have a showing of fact about why you're prohibiting data centers. I don't think we have to do that. We I mean we've made some pretty significant changes in what was allowed and not we have disallowed schools, right? Yeah. Um As I understand it, yeah, it's to you disallowed screeners. Yes. You voted on it. Where was this? In the business industrial zone. Oh, oh, okay. Oh, yeah, and that okay. We didn't ban schools. See. Yeah. We definitely remembered that one. So what do people think? And we don't have to decide this now, but it was just uh uh I was filling time till Adam got eight.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com