OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Montgomery County, Maryland/County Council & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Health and Human Services Committee Meeting on IDD Services - July 23, 2026

County Council & Committees — Thursday, July 23, 2026
BodyMontgomery County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Committees
DateThursday, July 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 24:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Health and Human Services session today where we will be discussing two pieces of legislation introduced by my colleague, Councilmember Don Ludke.

0:16

We are joined by our other committee member, Mr.

0:20

Councilmember Andrew Friedson.

0:24

So we will be talking about two items focused on supporting and strengthening services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities across Montgomery County.

0:38

Before we begin, I just want to share a quick reminder that today's session is being televised live on County Cable Montgomery and streamed on the council's website.

0:49

The first item that we will be discussing is Bill 28-26, Health and Sanitation, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Commission membership appointment terms and amendments.

1:04

Our first item regarding the IDD commission will address membership appointments and terms to ensure the commission remains effective, representative and aligned with community needs.

1:19

I will let Mr.

1:20

Ogorzelec brief us on the staff report and key provisions of the bill.

1:25

And then we will hear from the bill sponsor, Councilmember Ludgey.

1:30

Thank you very much, Chair Sales.

1:45

This bill would revise the structure of the voting members on the commission.

1:52

Presently, there are 11 of those 19 members must either be individuals with IDD or family members, guardians, or support staff of the V of individuals with IDD.

2:04

The revised structure would expand the scope of those 11 members up to 15 members, which would bring the total commission number of voting numbers from 19 to 23.

2:16

And it would that those 15 members would be divided as five individuals with IDD, five individuals who again fall into that family or guardians of individuals with IDD, and then a third tranche of five members who come from either of those two categories.

2:33

And I would also note that the bill would require that at least three of those 15 total members be individuals who participate in self-directed services, which is a term defined in state law.

2:46

The only impact statement so far is the fiscal impact, which indicates uh no impact.

2:51

Uh, there were multiple speakers at uh public hearing, all of whom testified in support.

2:57

And there is one amendment.

2:59

I don't know, Councilmember Ludke.

3:01

Do you want to discuss that first or would you like me to introduce that?

3:05

Uh sure.

3:06

At the time the bill was introduced, um, the our committee here all assembled.

3:12

We had sent a letter to full council announcing the intent of to name the bill after Jake Dedensky, who was one of the original members of the IDD commission, um, and is an individual with a developmental disability who whose advocacy brought this issue forth and who came to our uh public testimony on the bill again to continue advocating on behalf of those um in the community who are most affected and whose voices need to be elevated rather than having others speak on their behalf.

3:46

So that is why we um requested to add an amendment to change the name of the bill, um, which would allow us to call it the Jake Dedinski Advocacy Act.

3:57

Thank you.

3:59

And nothing further from staff.

4:02

Uh thank you, Ms.

4:03

Del Gorzalek.

4:05

And if there are no further comments or questions, we move to approve to recommend this to the full council.

4:14

Do we need to take a look at the uh vote?

4:17

Okay.

4:18

Can we uh yeah, I move to approve.

4:20

Make the motion.

4:22

Thank you.

4:22

All those in favor, raise your hand.

4:26

Free nothing as amended.

4:27

Thank you.

4:27

Thank you.

4:32

All right.

4:33

Moving along, that brings us to our second bill, 1226.

4:41

Or welcoming Christine Wellens and our director of aging and disability services, Dr.

4:50

Patrice McGee and Miss Mayo.

4:54

Thank you so much for joining us.

4:56

I wanted to um just briefly share the Bill 2820.

5:04

Bill 1226 focuses on payments to service providers for persons with developmental disabilities.

5:12

Ensuring our service providers have reliable and sustainable support is critical to maintaining high quality care and resources for vulnerable residents.

5:22

I will turn this over to Council staff, Ms.

5:26

Wellins, to present the staff report on Bill 1226, and then we will hear from Dr.

5:32

McGee and Ms.

5:34

Mayo before hearing from council colleagues.

5:38

Great.

5:38

Thank you so much, Madam President, and thank you.

5:41

Council members, good afternoon.

5:44

Bill 1226 is entitled Finance Payments to Service Providers with Persons with Developmental Disabilities and relates to the as the chair explained the supplemental payments that go from the county to providers with for persons with developmental disabilities.

6:01

The bill was introduced by the council president at the request of the county executive on February 10th, 2026, a public hearing occurred on March 10th.

6:13

And this bill, as proposed, is as I understand it, and as explained by the county executive, intended really to uh clean up some of the provisions of current law in order to align with current budgetary practices.

6:32

The bill really does two things.

6:34

Uh, one is it um updates the language by eliminating a required recommendation that is made annually by DHHS to the council and to the county executive based on uh recommending the amount of the payments to the service providers based on uh certain specified metrics.

6:58

And um, in addition, it would delete that because those metrics and that process is not reflective of how the current process works.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Disability Rights█████████████████████████████████████████████76%
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████24%
Summary of Proceedings

Health and Human Services Committee Meeting on IDD Services - July 23, 2026

The Montgomery County Council Health and Human Services Committee met on July 23, 2026, from 1:02 p.m. to 1:31 p.m., chaired by Councilmember Laurie-Anne Sayles. The committee discussed two bills aimed at strengthening services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Multiple speakers testified at the public hearing for Bill 28-26, all in support of the legislation, which expands the IDD Commission membership and renames the bill the “Jake Didinsky Advocacy Act.” No public testimony was heard during the committee meeting for Bill 12-26.

Discussion Items

  • Bill 28-26 – IDD Commission Membership and Terms: Legislative Attorney Ogorzalek presented the bill, which expands the number of voting members representing individuals with IDD and their families from 11 to 15 (split into five individuals with IDD, five family members/guardians, and five from either category), increasing the total commission from 19 to 23. The bill also requires that at least three of the 15 members participate in self-directed services. Councilmember Luedtke proposed an amendment to name the bill the “Jake Didinsky Advocacy Act” in honor of a former commission member and advocate. The amendment was supported without objection.
  • Bill 12-26 – Payments to Service Providers for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: Chief Legislative Attorney Wellons explained that the bill updates current law to align with actual budgeting practices by removing an outdated requirement for DHHS to annually recommend payment amounts based on a 125% minimum wage metric. It also clarifies that providers must serve Montgomery County residents within the county. Dr. Patrice McGee, Chief of Aging and Disability Services, and Kim Mayo, Administrator of Community Support Network, noted that the provider consortium (Interact) now submits budget requests directly, and wage surveys and customer satisfaction surveys are conducted annually to ensure compliance with the county minimum wage.
  • Concerns about DDA Funding and Provider Sustainability: Councilmember Friedson expressed strong support for DD providers but voiced concern about the compression between rising county minimum wages and potential state funding cuts. He noted a possible 2% reduction in Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) funding, currently on hold pending CMS review, with an anticipated effective date of October 1, 2026. Dr. McGee estimated a potential $22 million shortfall if the cut is implemented. Friedson requested timely updates on any DDA changes and their impact on providers and direct support professionals. Chair Sayles requested that DHHS provide an overview of collected data including wage information, turnover rates, and customer satisfaction survey results.

Key Outcomes

  • Bill 28-26: The committee unanimously supported the amendment to rename the bill the “Jake Didinsky Advocacy Act” and recommended enactment of the bill as amended. Council action will be scheduled for a later date.
  • Bill 12-26: The committee recommended enactment of the bill as introduced. Council action is scheduled for July 28, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Health and Human Services session today where we will be discussing two pieces of legislation introduced by my colleague, Councilmember Don Ludke. We are joined by our other committee member, Mr. Councilmember Andrew Friedson. So we will be talking about two items focused on supporting and strengthening services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities across Montgomery County. Before we begin, I just want to share a quick reminder that today's session is being televised live on County Cable Montgomery and streamed on the council's website. The first item that we will be discussing is Bill 28-26, Health and Sanitation, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Commission membership appointment terms and amendments. Our first item regarding the IDD commission will address membership appointments and terms to ensure the commission remains effective, representative and aligned with community needs. I will let Mr. Ogorzelec brief us on the staff report and key provisions of the bill. And then we will hear from the bill sponsor, Councilmember Ludgey. Thank you very much, Chair Sales. This bill would revise the structure of the voting members on the commission. Presently, there are 11 of those 19 members must either be individuals with IDD or family members, guardians, or support staff of the V of individuals with IDD. The revised structure would expand the scope of those 11 members up to 15 members, which would bring the total commission number of voting numbers from 19 to 23. And it would that those 15 members would be divided as five individuals with IDD, five individuals who again fall into that family or guardians of individuals with IDD, and then a third tranche of five members who come from either of those two categories. And I would also note that the bill would require that at least three of those 15 total members be individuals who participate in self-directed services, which is a term defined in state law. The only impact statement so far is the fiscal impact, which indicates uh no impact. Uh, there were multiple speakers at uh public hearing, all of whom testified in support. And there is one amendment. I don't know, Councilmember Ludke. Do you want to discuss that first or would you like me to introduce that? Uh sure. At the time the bill was introduced, um, the our committee here all assembled. We had sent a letter to full council announcing the intent of to name the bill after Jake Dedensky, who was one of the original members of the IDD commission, um, and is an individual with a developmental disability who whose advocacy brought this issue forth and who came to our uh public testimony on the bill again to continue advocating on behalf of those um in the community who are most affected and whose voices need to be elevated rather than having others speak on their behalf. So that is why we um requested to add an amendment to change the name of the bill, um, which would allow us to call it the Jake Dedinski Advocacy Act. Thank you. And nothing further from staff. Uh thank you, Ms. Del Gorzalek. And if there are no further comments or questions, we move to approve to recommend this to the full council. Do we need to take a look at the uh vote? Okay. Can we uh yeah, I move to approve. Make the motion. Thank you. All those in favor, raise your hand. Free nothing as amended. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Moving along, that brings us to our second bill, 1226. Or welcoming Christine Wellens and our director of aging and disability services, Dr. Patrice McGee and Miss Mayo. Thank you so much for joining us. I wanted to um just briefly share the Bill 2820. Bill 1226 focuses on payments to service providers for persons with developmental disabilities. Ensuring our service providers have reliable and sustainable support is critical to maintaining high quality care and resources for vulnerable residents. I will turn this over to Council staff, Ms. Wellins, to present the staff report on Bill 1226, and then we will hear from Dr. McGee and Ms.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com