OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Montgomery County, Maryland/County Council & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Montgomery County Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee Reviews Bills 32-26 and 33-26, October 8, 2026

County Council & Committees — Thursday, October 8, 2026
BodyMontgomery County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Committees
DateThursday, October 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 32:09

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:02

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to this session of the Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee.

0:08

We have two bills we'll we'll be reviewing today.

0:11

The first is expedited bill 32-26 employees retirement system, survivor benefits, death during line of duty, expedite eligibility to groups E and J.

0:23

We have Councilmember Lukey here joining us for this portion of our committee session.

0:30

And also lead on this bill was Councilmember Katz.

0:34

And I think everyone on the council co-sponsored this legislation.

0:40

But first I will turn to my committee members, particularly Councilmember Katz to see if you have anything to say, and then turn it over to Councilmember Lukey.

Speaker 2

0:48

No, thank you.

0:49

I I believe this is something that should have been done a long time ago.

0:53

It's taken us longer than it should.

0:55

And that doesn't mean that that uh even though it's taken longer than it should, it doesn't we certainly are gonna, I believe, take care of this today.

1:02

Uh everyone knows that that when someone gives their life, literally, for uh their their work in uh in uh Montgomery County, they're deserving of uh their families are deserving of all the survivor benefits.

1:16

So I thank all of my colleagues for working with us on this and everyone else associated with

Unassigned speaker

1:21

it.

Unassigned speaker

1:22

Okay, Councilmember Evans, do you have anything or I'll turn it over to Councilmember Lukey?

Speaker 1

1:25

Okay, Councilmember Lukey.

Speaker 3

1:27

Thank you, madam chair.

1:28

Um yes, this is uh a bill that is simply an extension of the work that we uh already started with the HERO Act last year covering our uh firefighters and police.

1:41

Um and I want to thank um McGeo for working with us on this bill and on the timing of it uh because I respect our collective bargaining processes, and so uh the reason why we are here now with this as opposed to having done it earlier was because they were in the middle of bargaining, and that's important.

1:59

So um with that, I think it's very straightforward.

2:03

It simply adds the two additional um retirement groups to uh the the law that to make the changes that we had already applied um for fire and rescue service uh career firefighters as well as our law enforcement at MCPD.

2:19

Um and with that, turn it back to you, Madam Chair.

2:22

Thank you.

2:22

Um I'll turn it over to Ms.

2:24

Wellins to walk us

Speaker 4

2:25

through

Unassigned speaker

2:25

it.

Speaker 4

2:26

Great, thank you so much.

2:27

Uh thank you and good morning, council members.

2:29

Um the expedited bill 32 26, um, as has been noted would expand upon the HERO Act, which the council enacted in 2025.

2:40

That was Council Bill 3525, which increased survivor benefits available to police officers and and firefighters if there's a line of duty death.

2:50

And um so this again, you know, as uh the lead sponsor stated, it will expand um expand the the additional uh line of duty death survivor options um to members of of retirement groups J and E, which are um employees uh working in correctional facilities, emergency communications, and which also includes correctional officers and sworn deputy sheriffs.

3:22

Um the bill is relatively straightforward in that respect.

3:28

There is um one potential amendment for the committee's consideration, and that is um to align the provisions of uh bill 3626 with the provisions of bill 2126, which the council recently enacted um in conformance with the bargain the current bargain agreements with McGeo, and that bill took out um certain age requirements for uh being qualified to be eligible to retire.

4:03

And so, in accordance with that bill, we need to tweak the language of Bill 3626, and um the potential amendment for your consideration is at pages three and four of the staff memorandum.

4:18

So happy to try to answer any questions on that one.

4:21

Thanks.

Speaker 1

4:21

Any questions, Councilmember Katz?

Speaker 2

4:23

I would certainly make uh move to uh to uh approve that amendment.

Speaker 1

4:28

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

4:29

Okay,

Speaker 1

4:29

any questions?

4:30

Councilmember Evans.

Speaker 5

4:32

No, so at the onset, I didn't say anything.

4:34

I just want to say it's a no-brainer, which is why I believe all of my colleagues signed on.

4:38

And so no, I'm very supportive of this.

4:40

All right.

Speaker 1

4:40

I think without objection, we'll accept that amendment.

Unassigned speaker

4:43

Yeah.

Unassigned speaker

4:44

Thank you.

Speaker 1

4:45

Anything else, Ms.

Speaker 4

4:46

Mullins?

4:46

Um, I think that's those are all the issues for the spell.

Speaker 1

4:49

All right, terrific.

4:50

And I do want to note that we have representatives here from our uh unions as uh

Unassigned speaker

4:55

uh

Speaker 1

4:55

councilmember Lukey mentioned.

Unassigned speaker

4:56

We wanted to do this, make sure that we were lockstep with everyone as we were moving forward with this.

Speaker 1

5:01

We appreciate Ms.

5:01

Wellens um for your work on this.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Engagement█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Public Information Act███████████12%
Personnel Matters██████████11%
Community Engagement█████████10%
Public Safety█████5%
Technology and Innovation█████5%
Racial Equity████4%
Procedural████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Montgomery County Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting - October 8, 2026

The Montgomery County Council's Government Operations and Fiscal Policy (GO) Committee met on October 8, 2026, for a scheduled 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. session in Room 3CHR. The committee reviewed two bills: Expedited Bill 32-26 on expanded survivor benefits and Bill 33-26 on community media organization contracting requirements. Both bills received unanimous favorable recommendations to the full council.

Expedited Bill 32-26 - Employees' Retirement System: Survivor Benefits for Line-of-Duty Deaths

  • Councilmember Katz, the lead on the bill, expressed strong support, saying the change 'should have been done a long time ago' and that families of employees who give their lives in county service deserve all survivor benefits. He noted all councilmembers co-sponsored the legislation.
  • Councilmember Luedtke (referred to as 'Lukey' in the transcript) said the bill extends the HERO Act work from 2025 to additional retirement groups and thanked MCGEO for working with the council on timing, respecting collective bargaining.
  • Staff explained that Expedited Bill 32-26 expands the HERO Act (Council Bill 35-25, enacted 2025), which increased survivor benefits for police officers and firefighters killed in the line of duty, to retirement Groups E and J: correctional facility employees, emergency communications personnel, correctional officers, and sworn deputy sheriffs.
  • Staff presented an amendment to align the bill with Bill 21-26, recently enacted in conformance with MCGEO collective bargaining agreements, by removing certain age requirements for retirement eligibility. The committee adopted the amendment without objection.
  • Councilmember Evans called the bill a 'no-brainer' and expressed full support.
  • The committee voted unanimously to recommend the bill favorably to the full council.

Bill 33-26 - Cable Communications: Community Media Organization Requirements

  • Chair Stewart provided context that the bill amends Section 8A-32 of the County Code, which enables the county to contract with one or more community media organizations using cable TV special revenue funds or other funds designated for community media. She clarified that the bill does not affect nonprofits that are not defined as community media organizations.
  • She said the legislation follows the 2023 OLO report, addresses drastically dwindling cable funds, and reflects work with TEBS, MCM, Montgomery College, and MCPS to update county code and align with other county entities and national practices.
  • Staff summarized current bill provisions: a contracting community media organization must adopt a racial equity and social justice statement, board members must file financial disclosure statements, the board must include up to seven voting residents, with at least one member nominated by the county council and one by the county executive, and the organization must comply with the Open Meetings Act and the Maryland Public Information Act as originally drafted.
  • Staff noted the county has contracted with MCM since 2004 and that the packet inadvertently included a 2024 production services contract rather than the 2004 contract; staff said the correct contract would be added to the packet.
  • MCM's executive officer, Ms. White, submitted recommendations and analysis on the legislation. MCM board members and partner organizations were present in the audience.
  • The committee adopted amendments to require county-nominated board members to have experience in administration or financial management of a nonprofit media organization or governmental entity and to bar them from holding elected office while serving. The committee also removed the Maryland Public Information Act compliance requirement while retaining Open Meetings Act compliance.
  • The committee adopted an amendment, requested through the MCM board chair, changing the board residency requirement from 'up to seven voting members who must be residents' to 'a majority of voting members must be residents' because MCM's current board has 13 members and its bylaws allow 15.
  • The committee adopted a supplemental editorial independence amendment requiring bylaws to address board responsibilities, prohibit board members from exercising editorial control over news, ensure independent and unbiased news coverage free from pre-publication review by charitable donors, government interference, or political influence, and establish an editorial independence policy aligned with industry standards. During discussion, the phrase 'financial donors' was changed to 'charitable donors' to avoid conflicting with county contracts for collaborative production work.
  • Councilmember Evans voiced support, saying the goal was good governance and to set MCM up for success, not to interfere with MCM's operations or mission.
  • The committee voted unanimously to recommend the bill favorably to the full council as amended.

Key Outcomes

  • Expedited Bill 32-26: The committee unanimously recommended favorable action to the full council, with the technical alignment amendment.
  • Bill 33-26: The committee unanimously recommended favorable action to the full council as amended, including amendments on board qualifications, board size/residency, removal of MPIA compliance, and editorial independence provisions.
  • Staff will supplement the Bill 33-26 packet with the correct 2004 contract.
  • Chair Stewart thanked Susan Madden, who is retiring from Montgomery College, and recognized TEBS, MCM, Montgomery College, and MCPS for their collaboration before adjourning the meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to this session of the Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee. We have two bills we'll we'll be reviewing today. The first is expedited bill 32-26 employees retirement system, survivor benefits, death during line of duty, expedite eligibility to groups E and J. We have Councilmember Lukey here joining us for this portion of our committee session. And also lead on this bill was Councilmember Katz. And I think everyone on the council co-sponsored this legislation. But first I will turn to my committee members, particularly Councilmember Katz to see if you have anything to say, and then turn it over to Councilmember Lukey. No, thank you. I I believe this is something that should have been done a long time ago. It's taken us longer than it should. And that doesn't mean that that uh even though it's taken longer than it should, it doesn't we certainly are gonna, I believe, take care of this today. Uh everyone knows that that when someone gives their life, literally, for uh their their work in uh in uh Montgomery County, they're deserving of uh their families are deserving of all the survivor benefits. So I thank all of my colleagues for working with us on this and everyone else associated with it. Okay, Councilmember Evans, do you have anything or I'll turn it over to Councilmember Lukey? Okay, Councilmember Lukey. Thank you, madam chair. Um yes, this is uh a bill that is simply an extension of the work that we uh already started with the HERO Act last year covering our uh firefighters and police. Um and I want to thank um McGeo for working with us on this bill and on the timing of it uh because I respect our collective bargaining processes, and so uh the reason why we are here now with this as opposed to having done it earlier was because they were in the middle of bargaining, and that's important. So um with that, I think it's very straightforward. It simply adds the two additional um retirement groups to uh the the law that to make the changes that we had already applied um for fire and rescue service uh career firefighters as well as our law enforcement at MCPD. Um and with that, turn it back to you, Madam Chair. Thank you. Um I'll turn it over to Ms. Wellins to walk us through it. Great, thank you so much. Uh thank you and good morning, council members. Um the expedited bill 32 26, um, as has been noted would expand upon the HERO Act, which the council enacted in 2025. That was Council Bill 3525, which increased survivor benefits available to police officers and and firefighters if there's a line of duty death. And um so this again, you know, as uh the lead sponsor stated, it will expand um expand the the additional uh line of duty death survivor options um to members of of retirement groups J and E, which are um employees uh working in correctional facilities, emergency communications, and which also includes correctional officers and sworn deputy sheriffs. Um the bill is relatively straightforward in that respect. There is um one potential amendment for the committee's consideration, and that is um to align the provisions of uh bill 3626 with the provisions of bill 2126, which the council recently enacted um in conformance with the bargain the current bargain agreements with McGeo, and that bill took out um certain age requirements for uh being qualified to be eligible to retire. And so, in accordance with that bill, we need to tweak the language of Bill 3626, and um the potential amendment for your consideration is at pages three and four of the staff memorandum. So happy to try to answer any questions on that one. Thanks. Any questions, Councilmember Katz? I would certainly make uh move to uh to uh approve that amendment. Okay. Okay, any questions? Councilmember Evans. No, so at the onset, I didn't say anything. I just want to say it's a no-brainer, which is why I believe all of my colleagues signed on. And so no, I'm very supportive of this. All right. I think without objection, we'll accept that amendment. Yeah. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com