OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Montgomery County, Maryland/County Council & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Public Safety Committee Work Session on Police Accountability Board Annual Report - October 19, 2026

County Council & Committees — Monday, October 19, 2026
BodyMontgomery County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Committees
DateMonday, October 19, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:08:39

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:01

Well,

Speaker 1

0:01

good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Public Safety Committee Work Session of Monday, October 19, 2026.

0:08

Today we have one topic on the agenda, which is an update of the Police Accountability Board annual report.

0:16

As we begin, I'd like to thank Ms.

0:18

Farag for preparing the staff report for the for the topic today, and for once again an always assembling most informative package for us.

0:26

As we begin, I'm going to ask the other public safety committee members if they have any opening comments.

0:31

Then we're going to ask the panel to please introduce themselves and ask if they have any opening comments.

Unassigned speaker

0:38

And

Speaker 1

0:38

then I'm going to ask Ms.

0:39

Farag to please walk us through the discussion.

0:41

Do either one of you.

0:42

We're good.

0:44

Please, if you will introduce yourselves.

Kwasi Hawks · Speaker 2Inferred

0:47

And uh good morning members.

0:49

My name is Kwasi Hawks, and I'm the uh incoming administrative manager for the PAB and ACC.

Speaker 3

0:57

Good morning, members.

0:58

My name is Mr.

0:59

Paul Walker.

1:00

I'm the chairman of the police accountability board.

Unassigned speaker

1:04

Good

Speaker 4

1:04

morning.

1:05

George Juetis, the vice chair of the police accountability

Unassigned speaker

1:07

board.

Speaker 5

1:09

Good morning.

1:10

James Hopkins, I'm the current chair of the ACC committee.

Unassigned speaker

1:15

Good

Speaker 6

1:16

morning, Richard Rosanna.

1:17

I'm a member of the police accountability board.

Speaker 1

1:21

Any opening comments or no?

1:24

Very good.

1:25

First off, as we begin, let me thank everybody for doing what you do.

1:29

I know you never get enough thanks, and you deserve a lot of thanks for doing it.

1:32

Ms.

1:32

Ferrong, please.

Speaker 7

1:33

Good morning.

1:34

Chair Katz, as you had mentioned, this is a follow-up from a March work session where you got into more depth on the actual 2025 annual report.

1:42

So I'm not going to get into too much detail.

1:44

I have attached it for your review.

1:46

And very briefly, the police accountability board's PowerPoint will get into some of those higher level statistics from last year.

1:54

But I think the focus today will be on the PAB's focus memo, where they've made some requests and some asks and

Unassigned speaker

2:00

have

Speaker 7

2:00

pointed out some challenges operationally that helped them get additional information to provide more robust recommendations.

2:09

And part of this harkens back to a special counsel opinion that I've distributed to you.

2:14

You've seen it already, but it was from April 2025.

2:17

I should have included it in the packet, and my apologies for not doing it.

2:20

So I put

Unassigned speaker

2:20

it

Speaker 7

2:22

with you today.

2:23

So I am going to turn it back over to the PAB to go through their PowerPoint first, unless you'd like to hit on some salient points in your focus memo first.

Speaker 1

2:46

Which ever you're comfortable with.

2:49

We're here.

2:50

Please.

Unassigned speaker

2:56

Of

Speaker 3

2:57

course, this is this is the PAB annual report of 2025.

3:02

Page two, of course, is the executive summary of the PAB slash ACC challenges.

3:11

Growth of complaints reflects growing public awareness and trust in PAB.

3:23

Challenges, lack of data specificity from the ACC's decisions, low fidelity in the trial board outcomes.

3:40

Page three.

3:51

One category is hiring and training.

3:54

These ad hoc groups under the PAB met with LEA professionals and community stakeholders, attended several academy training classes and met with police candidates, or should say cadets near and immediately after graduation.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████83%
Miscellaneous█████████17%
Summary of Proceedings

Public Safety Committee Work Session on Police Accountability Board Annual Report - October 19, 2026

The Montgomery County Council Public Safety (PS) Committee, chaired by Sidney Katz, held a work session on Monday, October 19, 2026, to receive an update on the Police Accountability Board (PAB) Annual Report. The meeting included presentations from PAB Chair Paul Walker, Vice Chair George Juetis, ACC Chair James Hopkins, and PAB/ACC staff, facilitated by Council Staff Ms. Farag. The discussion centered on the PAB's focus memo which identified operational challenges and three central requests to improve data transparency and effectiveness.

Discussion Items

  • PAB Annual Report Findings: PAB leadership presented data showing a significant increase in public engagement, with cases rising from 8 in 2022 to 85 in the latest reporting period. Of the 434 total allegations, 80% relate to bias or use of force. The board highlighted that residents identifying as Black are overrepresented in complaints at approximately 35%. A critical challenge is the lack of visibility into final trial board outcomes; for example, three Montgomery County Police Department (MCPD) termination trial boards resulted in zero officer terminations. The PAB stated it cannot fully meet its statutory mandate to make specific policy recommendations without stronger data from the ACC and law enforcement agencies.
  • Legislative Request for ACC Data: The PAB formally requested an amendment to county law to require the Administrative Charging Committee (ACC) to provide its written opinions to the PAB under existing confidentiality protections. Council Staff Ms. Farag noted a 2025 special counsel opinion states the ACC is not required, but may, share these opinions. ACC Chair James Hopkins raised concerns about protecting the identities of officers and complainants. PAB members countered that they receive this front-end data, are willing to sign additional non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), and require the full data for robust trend analysis.
  • Data Analyst Staffing Request: The PAB requested funding for a full-time research and data specialist (Grade 90 or higher), noting that jurisdictions like Prince George's County employ multiple analysts to support similar boards.
  • Trial Board Coordination: The committee discussed the disconnect between ACC charging decisions and trial board outcomes. Councilmember Mink argued that trial board counsel must have input into the charging process to fix the current system yielding incongruent results.

Key Outcomes

  • Formal Support for PAB Requests: Committee Chair Sidney Katz formally supported all three PAB requests: amending the county code to mandate ACC data sharing, funding a dedicated data analyst position, and improving legal coordination for trial boards. He noted it is a "cruel joke" to assign duties without providing resources.
  • Mandate vs. Voluntary Approach: Councilmember Luedtke expressed strong frustration over the lack of progress since March and advocated mandating data sharing through legislation rather than relying on ongoing voluntary discussions, stating the PAB cannot fulfill its mandate under the status quo.
  • Path Forward: The committee committed to bringing forward the necessary legislative and budgetary items. The PAB's willingness to sign enhanced NDAs was highlighted as a viable solution to address confidentiality impasses, allowing data-driven oversight of police accountability processes.

Meeting Transcript

Well, good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Public Safety Committee Work Session of Monday, October 19, 2026. Today we have one topic on the agenda, which is an update of the Police Accountability Board annual report. As we begin, I'd like to thank Ms. Farag for preparing the staff report for the for the topic today, and for once again an always assembling most informative package for us. As we begin, I'm going to ask the other public safety committee members if they have any opening comments. Then we're going to ask the panel to please introduce themselves and ask if they have any opening comments. And then I'm going to ask Ms. Farag to please walk us through the discussion. Do either one of you. We're good. Please, if you will introduce yourselves. And uh good morning members. My name is Kwasi Hawks, and I'm the uh incoming administrative manager for the PAB and ACC. Good morning, members. My name is Mr. Paul Walker. I'm the chairman of the police accountability board. Good morning. George Juetis, the vice chair of the police accountability board. Good morning. James Hopkins, I'm the current chair of the ACC committee. Good morning, Richard Rosanna. I'm a member of the police accountability board. Any opening comments or no? Very good. First off, as we begin, let me thank everybody for doing what you do. I know you never get enough thanks, and you deserve a lot of thanks for doing it. Ms. Ferrong, please. Good morning. Chair Katz, as you had mentioned, this is a follow-up from a March work session where you got into more depth on the actual 2025 annual report. So I'm not going to get into too much detail. I have attached it for your review. And very briefly, the police accountability board's PowerPoint will get into some of those higher level statistics from last year. But I think the focus today will be on the PAB's focus memo, where they've made some requests and some asks and have pointed out some challenges operationally that helped them get additional information to provide more robust recommendations. And part of this harkens back to a special counsel opinion that I've distributed to you. You've seen it already, but it was from April 2025. I should have included it in the packet, and my apologies for not doing it. So I put it with you today. So I am going to turn it back over to the PAB to go through their PowerPoint first, unless you'd like to hit on some salient points in your focus memo first. Which ever you're comfortable with.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com