Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: May 21, 2025 – Residences at Naper and Plank Hearing
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – May 21, 2025
The Naperville Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) met on May 21, 2025, at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers. The primary agenda item was a public hearing on the proposed Residences at Naper and Plank development (PZC 24-1-128/DEV-0035-2025), a 90-unit townhome and row home project. After public testimony and deliberation, the commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the requested zoning entitlements, conditional use, PUD plat, and deviations. A second public hearing was cancelled and rescheduled, and minutes from prior meetings were approved.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Nick Dunkel (resident east of Naper Blvd): Expressed support for development of the site but concerns about density (citing Plank Road study limit of 8 units/acre), dangerous intersection at Naper Blvd and Plank (frequent accidents), and lack of sidewalks. Requested roadway improvements and a traffic study update.
- Andrew Serino (resident on Tuthill, HOA member of Pheasant Glen): Noted insufficient public notice (not all nearby residents were notified of the March 26 open house). Argued the site is not transitional (80% surrounded by single-family homes). Criticized the July 2024 traffic study for not being conducted during the school year. Cited worsening traffic from Seven Brew coffee and Costco. Preferred single-family homes.
- Elizabeth Baumgart (35-year resident of Mulberry Hill Estates): Opposed the proposed development, calling it too dense and out of character with the single-family neighborhood. Raised concerns about traffic congestion, future densification, and the high rents ($3,900–$5,000/month) being unaffordable for many. Suggested one- or two-story brick townhomes instead.
- Nick Zlatarov (resident on Tuthill south of Plank): Echoed traffic concerns, noting difficulty turning at Tuthill/Plank. Questioned the traffic study's accuracy (one-day count in summer), and pointed out that nearby schools (BB) are already overcrowded. Cited two existing rental communities nearby. Expressed doubt about the low projected student generation (17 students).
- Alice Chin (35-year resident, real estate broker in Pheasant Glen): Noted that zip code 60563 already has the highest rental percentage (53.5%) in Naperville. Questioned the petitioner's market analysis, comparing rents to median gross rent of $1,786. Pointed out discrepancy between the 2022 comprehensive plan (max 12 units/acre) and the 2010 Plank Road study (max 8 units/acre). Raised safety concerns about the park location at the busy corner of Naper Blvd and Plank.
- Greg Stevens (realtor, resident of Declan Court): Pro-development but argued the site should be single-family homes. Stated that 60563 zip code already has ~46% rentals, moving toward 50%. Provided six pages of resident signatures requesting single-family homes similar to Naper and 75th Street. Cited traffic dangers on Ogden Avenue and Seven Brew traffic.
- Maggie Hartigan (40-year resident on Tuthill): Notified of the open house only by a sign, not directly. Feared overpopulation and traffic nightmare. Urged the commission to deny the petition or significantly reduce density.
Discussion Items
- Staff Presentation (Adam Beaver, Planning Services): Overview of the 8.21-acre site (unincorporated, 12 parcels). Petitioner seeks annexation, rezoning to R3A (medium-density residential), conditional use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), preliminary PUD plat, and deviations for building height (38 ft vs. 35 ft max) and density (11 units/acre, 90 units vs. 89 allowed). Staff supported the plan, noting it aligns with the comprehensive plan, exceeds open space requirements (31% plus 0.62-acre park dedication), and includes roadway improvements.
- Petitioner Presentation (Vince Rosanova, attorney; Javier Milan, traffic engineer; Dan Free, civil engineer): Lincoln Property Company proposes 90-rental townhomes/row homes (two- and three-story). Density of 11 units/acre matches comprehensive plan target. Access via Tuthill and Burlington (no access from Plank or Naper Blvd). Roadway improvements: widen Tuthill and Burlington to 28 ft, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and stormwater detention. Traffic study (July 2024) showed minimal impact (0.1–0.6 sec delay increase). Projected student generation: 17 students (District 203 has capacity). Projected rents: $3,900–$5,000/month. On-site management, EV charging capability, and visitability features included.
- Commissioner Questions & Comments:
- Commissioner McDaniel noted that the commission does not consider revenue; decisions are based on land use and the master plan. He asked why the site hadn't been developed with single-family homes; staff responded no proposals had been received. He supported the development, citing open space and park district partnership.
- Commissioner Richelia asked for clarification on roadway improvements; petitioner confirmed widening of Tuthill, Burlington, and Plank.
- Commissioner Clemen asked about construction timeline (18 months, lease-up starting 9 months in) and on-site management (one model unit excluded from leasing). She supported the project, noting rents are in line with other high-end rentals and address housing shortage.
- Commissioner Robbins noted the plan aligns with the comprehensive plan and diversifies housing stock. She acknowledged residents' concerns and encouraged them to express them to City Council. She asked about the park location; petitioner stated it was chosen in collaboration with the Park District for visibility, with a buffer from the DuPage County-owned parcel.
- Commissioner King noted the effort put into the plan and that resident input was considered, though traffic studies could be revisited. She supported the land use as appropriate.
Key Outcomes
- Motion to Recommend Approval: Commissioner Clemen moved, seconded by Commissioner Richelia, to adopt the findings of fact and recommend approval of PZC 24-1-128/DEV-0035-2025, including rezoning to R3A upon annexation, conditional use for PUD, preliminary PUD plat, and deviations from Section 6-6D-8 (height) and Section 6-6D-5 (density) of the Municipal Code. The motion passed 5-0 (Ayes: King, McDaniel, Richelia, Robbins, Clemen; Excused: Castagnoli; Absent: Van Someren, Wright, Bansal).
- Cancellation and Rescheduling: The public hearing for DEV-0029-2025 was cancelled at the petitioner's request and will be rescheduled to the June 18, 2025, PZC meeting.
- Minutes Approval: The minutes of the May 7, 2025, training session and the May 7, 2025, regular meeting were approved unanimously.
- Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 8:32 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Meeting for May 21st, 2025 to order. All right, thank you, and let's get started. Secretary McDaniel, please conduct roll call. Commissioner Vonsall. Commissioner Castignoli. Commissioner Clement. Here. Commissioner King. Present. Commissioner McDaniel. Present. Commissioner Rikelio. Present. Commissioner Robins. Here. Commissioner Van Summer. And Commissioner Wright. We have a quorum, five to four. Great. The first order of business tonight is the public forum. During the public forum, members of the public have the opportunity to address the planning and zoning commission on the issues which are not part of tonight's agenda. Please keep your keep your comments limited to three minutes. Also, for the sake of all those in attendance, please refrain from clapping, shouting out in response to comments made by any speaker. Secretary Wright, do we have anyone signed up under public forum? Oh McDaniel. We do not have anyone sign up under public forum. All right. Our next order of business is public hearings. For each hearing, we will begin with a staff presentation or introduction, followed by the petitioners presentation. When we will then take public testimony to ensure that we have an opportunity to hear from each person wishing to speak. Please keep your comments specific to the request under consideration and try to avoid repetitive comments. Also, for the sake of all of those in attendance, please refrain from clapping or shouting out in response to the comments made by any speaker. Following all public testimony, the petitioner will provide closing remarks just prior to the closure of the public meeting. No further public testimony will be taken after the petitioner begins their closing remarks or during the planning and zoning commission's deliberation. I will now swear in any member of the public that wishes to speak. Those who wish to provide testimony, please stand up. Please raise. Please raise your right hand and respond. I do. I swear to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. All right. The first case on tonight's agenda is PCC 24-1-128. Development 0035-2025. The residents at Naper and Plank. Adam Beaver from staff will present the case. Thank you, Chair. Adam Beaver with the city's planning services team. The petitioner for PZC 24-1-128 slash DEV-0035-2025 is requesting zoning entitlements to construct a 90-unit single family attached residential development known as the residences at Naper and Plank. The subject property is comprised of 12 properties, which are located as defined in the staff report and is currently located in unincorporated DuPage County. The subject property is largely unimproved with several existing lots having structures that are proposed to be demolished prior to development.
openpublica.com