The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) met on Thursday, September 4, 2025, at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers at 400 S. Eagle Street. Chairman Brian Laird called the meeting to order, noting the absence of Councilwoman Longenbaugh as liaison and thanking her for her service. Roll call was taken with 7 members present (Hurley, Krzywinski, Neibel, Webb, Nair, Laird, Ulger) and 1 absent (Rose). The meeting adjourned at 8:33 PM.
September 4th, 2025 to order. Staff, please conduct the roll call. Mr. Hurley? Here. Mr. Kriswinski. Here. Mr. Laird. Here. Miss Nyer. Here. Mr. Nybel? Here. Mr. Olger? Here. Miss Rose. Not here. Mr. Webb. Here. So we have a quorum and the meeting is officially called to order. I would like to thank all the volunteers on the board giving their time to make Naperville a great place to live. I would also like to thank Councilwoman Longenbach for the service she's provided to the Transportation Advisory Board. Um, and we look forward to a new council liaison in the future. So we have uh another full agenda tonight, so let's get to it. Um the first order of business tonight is the public forum. During the public forum, members of the public have the opportunity to address the transportation advisory board on issues that are not part of tonight's agenda. Uh, in accordance with City of Naperville policies, comments should be limited to three minutes. Staff, do we have anyone signed up to speak as part of the public forum? We have one speaker, Marilyn Schweitzer. Longtime resident. Um, in April, City Council eliminated the 2025 cost share for sidewalk repair. This is a gift for 2025 select residents with no relief guaranteed in the future. My understanding was that staff was to bring a plan to potentially revise the existing program to TAB and coordinate it with the 2026 budget. I've heard nothing since April. This is not a discussion to pop up during budget discussions, nor once the 2026 program is ready for approval. A revised policy and ordinance needs to go before this board and on to city council where both can get adequate review. A sidewalk that is a hazard as defined by the city's criteria is simply a public safety hazard. We don't cost share curb work or street repair, so why sidewalk repair? Eliminating cost share may cost residents, may cost more residents to request hazardous sidewalks be repaired. This would be good. Hazards need to get fixed, and any backlog would be eliminated over time. The cost share for new sidewalks could be kept, but the elimination of cost share for sidewalk maintenance may reduce reluctance to close gaps. The revised program could cap the expense per year by setting a priority based on pedestrian volume and severity of the defect if this is indeed a budget concern. Sidewalk to pair, it depends much on the age of the sidewalk, the quality of the installation, tree roots and soil. Who pays for the cost share is simply the current owner?