OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nashua Board of Alderman Special Meeting: Public Hearing on Social Districts Referendum (October 14, 2025)

Board of Aldermen MeetingsTuesday, October 14, 2025
BodyNashua, New Hampshire
SessionBoard of Aldermen Meetings
DateTuesday, October 14, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:21

Special meeting of the Board of Alderman to order on Tuesday, October 14th, 2025 at 7 p.m.

0:27

in the old demandic chamber, which has been duly noticed in two places, including the city's website, in accordance with the requirements of RSA 91A.

0:35

The prayer will be offered tonight by City Clerk Dan Healy and Alderman Senate will lead us in the pledge to the flag.

0:42

Almighty God, we have the high honor and the serious duty to manage the affairs of our beloved city.

0:48

Fill us, oh God, with a spirit of unity and understanding, which enables us to face our multiple problems with a serene mind with justice and charity for all, so that any and all decisions made by us will always be for the betterment and greater happiness of all our fellow citizens.

1:05

So help us go on, Ava.

1:15

One nation under God in individuality and justice.

1:26

Let's start the meeting by taking a roll call attendance, please.

1:35

Aldman Moran.

1:36

Here.

1:39

Aldman Gobello.

1:41

Here.

1:42

Alderman Lopez.

1:45

Aldman Sullivan.

1:46

I'm here on Zoom as I'm traveling for work.

1:49

I'm alone in the room and I can hear you.

1:52

Aldwin Clemens.

1:54

Here.

1:55

Baldwin Sennett.

1:57

Here.

1:58

Alderman Jetty.

2:06

Yeah.

2:07

Alderman Tebow.

2:08

Yeah.

2:11

Alderman Clee.

2:12

Here.

2:14

Aldman Dowd.

2:15

President.

2:17

Aldwoman Kelly.

2:18

Here.

2:19

Alderman Wilshire.

2:21

Here.

2:21

Twelve present, three absent.

2:24

Thank you.

2:25

Also in attendance this evening is Corporation Council Steve Bolton.

2:31

So tonight we have a public hearing on resolution 25194.

2:37

Is there someone that's going to give us a little information about this?

2:42

Alderman Clemens.

2:44

Yes, I I I can if need be.

2:48

Need be.

2:49

All right.

2:51

So this um this came about this uh resolution um is putting a referendum on the ballot concerning social districts within the city of Nashua.

3:04

And what this comes from is legislation that was passed in the state uh this past uh spring, and it allows um cities and towns to be able to open up what they call social districts.

3:19

And what that is is it's a defined boundary within the city that allows basically open containers.

3:30

Very prescribed in how the um legislation is.

3:35

There's specific rules that the state has put into place that the city must follow if this were to be adopted.

3:43

In addition to that, the um even if this passes, this will still need to be adopted by the Board of Alderman with rules surrounding the area of where that would happen, the hours.

4:02

Um there would of course be public input stakeholders, things like that.

4:07

So a yes vote on this does not automatically make this happen.

4:12

Um there was some questions about why the um wording was so I guess minimal, which it just says, shall we allow the operation of social districts within the city of Nashua?

4:28

That's actually prescribed by the state law.

4:30

Um there are a couple cities, uh Concord being one of them.

4:34

It says the exact same thing, except obviously within the city of Concord.

4:39

Um, so the the meat and potatoes of this um really is do we want yes or no to allow this discussion to move forward?

4:52

A yes vote on that would continue that process.

5:00

A no vote would obviously signal to the city that the residents are not in favor of this.

5:03

So that is the summary.

5:06

Thank you.

5:08

All right, I'm gonna open up the uh public hearing to testimony in favor.

5:13

So if you'd like to give testimony in favor, you can come up to the microphone at the podium, give your name and address for the record, and give us you have three minutes to speak.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████100%
Summary of Proceedings

Nashua Board of Alderman Special Meeting: Public Hearing on Social Districts Referendum (October 14, 2025)

The Nashua Board of Alderman held a special meeting on October 14, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the Old Demonic Chamber. The sole purpose was a public hearing on Resolution R25194, which proposes placing a referendum on the ballot asking voters whether the city should allow the operation of social districts (designated areas where open containers would be permitted). The meeting was called to order with 12 aldermen present and 3 absent. After the hearing, the meeting adjourned at 7:07 PM.

Discussion Items

Alderman Clemens provided an overview of Resolution R25194. He explained that the resolution stems from state legislation passed in spring 2025 allowing municipalities to create social districts. The districts would be defined boundaries within the city permitting open containers, subject to specific state-prescribed rules. Even if the referendum passes, the Board of Alderman would still need to adopt rules governing the location, hours, and other details, with public input and stakeholder engagement. The wording on the ballot is prescribed by state law and is minimal. A 'yes' vote would continue the process toward potentially creating social districts; a 'no' vote would signal resident opposition. Clemens noted that Concord has a similar measure.

Key Outcomes

  • Public Hearing on Resolution R25194: No testimony was offered either in favor or in opposition. The hearing was closed at 7:06 PM.
  • Motion to adjourn was made by Alderman O'Brien and passed by roll call vote of 12-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:07 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Special meeting of the Board of Alderman to order on Tuesday, October 14th, 2025 at 7 p.m. in the old demandic chamber, which has been duly noticed in two places, including the city's website, in accordance with the requirements of RSA 91A. The prayer will be offered tonight by City Clerk Dan Healy and Alderman Senate will lead us in the pledge to the flag. Almighty God, we have the high honor and the serious duty to manage the affairs of our beloved city. Fill us, oh God, with a spirit of unity and understanding, which enables us to face our multiple problems with a serene mind with justice and charity for all, so that any and all decisions made by us will always be for the betterment and greater happiness of all our fellow citizens. So help us go on, Ava. One nation under God in individuality and justice. Let's start the meeting by taking a roll call attendance, please. Aldman Moran. Here. Aldman Gobello. Here. Alderman Lopez. Aldman Sullivan. I'm here on Zoom as I'm traveling for work. I'm alone in the room and I can hear you. Aldwin Clemens. Here. Baldwin Sennett. Here. Alderman Jetty. Yeah. Alderman Tebow. Yeah. Alderman Clee. Here. Aldman Dowd. President. Aldwoman Kelly. Here. Alderman Wilshire. Here. Twelve present, three absent. Thank you. Also in attendance this evening is Corporation Council Steve Bolton. So tonight we have a public hearing on resolution 25194. Is there someone that's going to give us a little information about this? Alderman Clemens. Yes, I I I can if need be. Need be. All right. So this um this came about this uh resolution um is putting a referendum on the ballot concerning social districts within the city of Nashua. And what this comes from is legislation that was passed in the state uh this past uh spring, and it allows um cities and towns to be able to open up what they call social districts. And what that is is it's a defined boundary within the city that allows basically open containers. Very prescribed in how the um legislation is. There's specific rules that the state has put into place that the city must follow if this were to be adopted. In addition to that, the um even if this passes, this will still need to be adopted by the Board of Alderman with rules surrounding the area of where that would happen, the hours. Um there would of course be public input stakeholders, things like that. So a yes vote on this does not automatically make this happen. Um there was some questions about why the um wording was so I guess minimal, which it just says, shall we allow the operation of social districts within the city of Nashua?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com