The Nashua Finance Committee met on September 16, 2026 (the meeting continued into early hours of September 17) to discuss the FY25 audit, approve several contracts including a major transit operations contract, and address public concerns. Key topics included the city's financial statements, an adverse opinion on Pennichuck Corporation, and a nearly $5 million reduction in state adequacy grants.
Note: The meeting occurred on September 16, 2026, but the given timestamp is September 17, 2026 at 01:17:03 UTC. The summary reflects the meeting date as stated in the transcript.
All right, we're going to call the meeting of the finance committee to order on September 16th, 2026. Mr. Clerk, would you please call the roll? Absolutely. Alder Woman Smith. Present. Alderman Sullivan is here. Alder Woman at large, Greg. Alderman at large Clemens. Here. Alder Woman at large, Lori Wilshire. Here. Older woman Clee, Vice Chair. And Mayor Jim Dodges. Alder Woman Clee contacted me to say that she has a health issue and could not come tonight. We have five here. All right. Next issue is public comment. Is there any member of the public who wishes to address the finance committee on any of tonight's agenda items? Lori Ordelano Nashua. I think the uh is the audit on the agenda. Yeah. I just had a couple things I wanted to mention about the audit. Um I'd like to try and understand why the report comes out so late. Like this is the 2024, 24-25 report for the closing, and it takes like 15, 16 months to get here, which seems like a long time and longer than it used to be. And I'm not certain how helpful it is when you're doing the next budget cycle when it still takes two budget cycles to get the information. Um I'd like to, and I think in the past it was done earlier, so there's something that makes it more difficult now to do that, and I'd like to understand that. Back maybe three years ago, I came here and I asked about discrepancies and how they get identified by the audit firm. And I understand that the firm, this isn't an audit, it's a review. And I think the firm depends on what the city provides it. But I raised the issue of a 7.1 million dollar loan that was taken out in support of the construction of an art center, and it's not on the financial statements. And if you follow GAP and Gatsby for your own policies, I don't understand why this loan never got recorded on the books and never got an answer to it. There's also a $9.5 million loan that the City of Nashua co-signed, and that's never been entered into the financial statements. And that was also relative to the art center. And even though that loan might have been prohibited under some of the RSA chapters when it came to loaning out money to a private company, the bottom line is we did. Uh it is a loan, and somehow it doesn't end up on our books. Um the other thing is in 2025, January, I filed a complaint with the DOJ regarding commingling of funds in our trust funds. And in January of 2026, the DOJ came out and said there was an issue, and the trust funds did have a commingling of funds. And I don't know how you come to realize this when you look at the 25. That was records based on 24 and 25. I don't know if the trust funds are part of this financial report, which would be the MS9s and tens. I think looking back at past reports, MS9s and tens were part of the review process, but I'm not certain they are now. And how how does that get caught analyzed? What does it mean, and what's the correction to that? So that's the commingling of funds that is not compliant with RSA 90A 91. I mean R the RSA, and I don't know the chapter. Um, the RSA's for independent accounting of trust fund money. Um, and the other thing is, you know, collecting outstanding property taxes. I wonder if an audit firm does anything to put pressure on a city to get those taxes collected, wastewater bills. 30 seconds per um I think that's an issue too.