OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Nashua, New Hampshire/Board of Aldermen Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nashua Finance Committee Meeting: Audit, Transit Contract, and State Funding Concerns - September 17, 2026

Board of Aldermen Meetings — Thursday, September 17, 2026
BodyNashua, New Hampshire
SessionBoard of Aldermen Meetings
DateThursday, September 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:04:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

All right, we're going to call the meeting of the finance committee to order on September 16th, 2026.

0:07

Mr.

0:07

Clerk, would you please call the roll?

0:09

Absolutely.

0:10

Alder Woman Smith.

0:11

Present.

0:12

Alderman Sullivan is here.

0:14

Alder Woman at large, Greg.

0:18

Alderman at large Clemens.

0:20

Here.

0:22

Alder Woman at large, Lori Wilshire.

0:24

Here.

0:26

Older woman Clee, Vice Chair.

0:31

And Mayor Jim Dodges.

0:32

Alder Woman Clee contacted me to say that she has a health issue and could not come tonight.

0:39

We have five here.

0:40

All right.

0:41

Next issue is public comment.

0:43

Is there any member of the public who wishes to address the finance committee on any of tonight's agenda items?

0:52

Lori Ordelano Nashua.

0:54

I think the uh is the audit on the agenda.

0:57

Yeah.

0:57

I just had a couple things I wanted to mention about the audit.

1:01

Um I'd like to try and understand why the report comes out so late.

1:07

Like this is the 2024, 24-25 report for the closing, and it takes like 15, 16 months to get here, which seems like a long time and longer than it used to be.

1:19

And I'm not certain how helpful it is when you're doing the next budget cycle when it still takes two budget cycles to get the information.

1:27

Um I'd like to, and I think in the past it was done earlier, so there's something that makes it more difficult now to do that, and I'd like to understand that.

1:37

Back maybe three years ago, I came here and I asked about discrepancies and how they get identified by the audit firm.

1:44

And I understand that the firm, this isn't an audit, it's a review.

1:49

And I think the firm depends on what the city provides it.

1:52

But I raised the issue of a 7.1 million dollar loan that was taken out in support of the construction of an art center, and it's not on the financial statements.

2:01

And if you follow GAP and Gatsby for your own policies, I don't understand why this loan never got recorded on the books and never got an answer to it.

2:12

There's also a $9.5 million loan that the City of Nashua co-signed, and that's never been entered into the financial statements.

2:20

And that was also relative to the art center.

2:23

And even though that loan might have been prohibited under some of the RSA chapters when it came to loaning out money to a private company, the bottom line is we did.

2:32

Uh it is a loan, and somehow it doesn't end up on our books.

2:36

Um the other thing is in 2025, January, I filed a complaint with the DOJ regarding commingling of funds in our trust funds.

2:46

And in January of 2026, the DOJ came out and said there was an issue, and the trust funds did have a commingling of funds.

2:55

And I don't know how you come to realize this when you look at the 25.

3:00

That was records based on 24 and 25.

3:03

I don't know if the trust funds are part of this financial report, which would be the MS9s and tens.

3:09

I think looking back at past reports, MS9s and tens were part of the review process, but I'm not certain they are now.

3:18

And how how does that get caught analyzed?

3:22

What does it mean, and what's the correction to that?

3:25

So that's the commingling of funds that is not compliant with RSA 90A 91.

3:30

I mean R the RSA, and I don't know the chapter.

3:33

Um, the RSA's for independent accounting of trust fund money.

3:39

Um, and the other thing is, you know, collecting outstanding property taxes.

3:44

I wonder if an audit firm does anything to put pressure on a city to get those taxes collected, wastewater bills.

3:52

30 seconds per um I think that's an issue too.

3:55

And we are now um putting liens on people who are not paying wastewater, but that started in 2025.

4:04

Prior to that, 2024, we were not putting any liens, and we have a lot of outstanding debt going back to 2020 on wastewater bills.

4:14

What's the write-off procedure to deal with those things?

4:18

Um those are some of my thoughts and questions.

4:23

I'm done.

4:24

Yeah, thank you.

4:28

All right.

4:28

Um we have next on the agenda is the pre uh well, is there anyone else from the public who wishes to address the committee?

4:36

Uh if not, the next issue is the presentation of the audit.

4:41

So I will turn it over to uh CFO Enright and our auditors.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Assessing Department Operations███████████████████████████27%
Transportation Safety██████████████████████22%
Public Comment███████████11%
Procurement Processes██████████10%
Pending Litigation██████6%
Public Health Services█████5%
Procedural█████5%
Pension Fund Management████4%
Budget Equity Analysis████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Nashua Finance Committee Meeting: Audit, Transit Contract, and State Funding Concerns - September 17, 2026

The Nashua Finance Committee met on September 16, 2026 (the meeting continued into early hours of September 17) to discuss the FY25 audit, approve several contracts including a major transit operations contract, and address public concerns. Key topics included the city's financial statements, an adverse opinion on Pennichuck Corporation, and a nearly $5 million reduction in state adequacy grants.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Lori Ordelano raised concerns about the late release of the FY25 audit (15–16 months after year-end), questioning its usefulness. She also asked about a $7.1 million loan and a $9.5 million loan related to the art center that were not recorded on financial statements, a DOJ finding of commingled trust funds, and outstanding property tax and wastewater collections.
  • In a second public comment, Ordelano criticized city officials for labeling her and alleged a lack of records regarding trauma counseling. She accused the city of creating a false narrative. Mayor Dodges denied calling her the C-word.

Discussion Items

FY25 Audit Presentation

  • CFO Don Enright introduced the FY25 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and new Comptroller Lisa Carls. Auditor Lara Stone (CBIS) presented a high-level overview.
  • Financial Highlights: General fund unassigned fund balance: $30.7 million; total fund balance: $106.4 million. Unrestricted net position is in a deficit due to long-term obligations ($309 million in pension and OPEB liabilities). General fund revenues exceeded expenditures by $17.4 million, but $12.1 million was transferred out (half to capital projects, half to subsidize solid waste enterprise fund).
  • Pennichuck Corporation Component Unit: An adverse opinion was issued for the discretely presented component units, solely due to Pennichuck. This resulted from a reevaluation after changes in Pennichuck's board makeup (adding two city-appointed members) triggered a requirement to report under GASB standards. Pennichuck opted to report under FASB instead, leading to a dual opinion (unmodified on FASB, adverse on GASB). Aldermen questioned why this change occurred now and whether it was retroactive.
  • Timing: The audit was delayed because of the Pennichuck issue; the audit firm pulled staff to address it in March 2026.
  • Alderman Sullivan asked about warning signs; Stone noted no red flags but will do a deeper review for FY26. The city turned back $11.2 million in budgeted expenditures and overcollected by nearly $13 million.

Communications (Contract Approvals)

  1. HVAC Maintenance: Approved a one-year contract with Palmer and Sicard Inc. for fire department HVAC maintenance, not to exceed $25,710. (Motion passed)
  2. Holiday Lighting: Approved a contract with New England Holiday Light Co. for downtown holiday lighting, not to exceed $26,100, for permanent tree lighting. (Motion passed)
  3. Sewer Flow Metering for Casino: Approved a contract with Hazen and Sawyer for sewer capacity analysis related to a proposed casino on Tara Boulevard, not to exceed $34,800.09, funded by the casino applicant. (Motion passed)
  4. Transit Operations Contract: Approved a 2.75-year contract with Transdev Inc. for fixed-route and paratransit services, not to exceed $9,789,870, with options for extensions up to seven years. Discussion focused on:
    • CDL vs. non-CDL billing: New structure bills at two different hourly rates to reflect actual driver type (non-CDL cheaper).
    • Insurance shift: Plan to shift liability from city self-insurance to vendor insurance starting year two, with a potential opt-out after year one if terms not agreed. Estimated insurance cost of $800,000 in years 2–3.
    • Performance measures: A 24-page supplementary conditions document includes detailed performance metrics and operational standards (e.g., uniform policy, driver conduct).
    • Aldermen questioned risk and cost analysis; Community Development Director Sullivan noted the city will analyze claims data over time.

Remarks by Alderman Clemens

  • Alderman Clemens reported that Nashua is losing nearly $5 million in state adequacy grants compared to last year, which will significantly impact the next budget. He urged questioning state representatives and the governor.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved four contracts: HVAC maintenance ($25,710), holiday lighting ($26,100), sewer flow metering ($34,800.09), and transit operations ($9,789,870). All motions passed unanimously.
  • Approved record of expenditures for August 28 – September 10, 2026.
  • No action on the FY25 audit; it was presented for information. The adverse opinion on Pennichuck will be monitored.
  • The transit contract includes a commitment to negotiate insurance terms over six months, with city option to opt out after year one if not agreed.
  • Alderman Clemens' remarks about state funding will be considered in upcoming budget discussions.
  • Meeting adjourned at 8:04 PM (local time, Sept 16).

Note: The meeting occurred on September 16, 2026, but the given timestamp is September 17, 2026 at 01:17:03 UTC. The summary reflects the meeting date as stated in the transcript.

Meeting Transcript

All right, we're going to call the meeting of the finance committee to order on September 16th, 2026. Mr. Clerk, would you please call the roll? Absolutely. Alder Woman Smith. Present. Alderman Sullivan is here. Alder Woman at large, Greg. Alderman at large Clemens. Here. Alder Woman at large, Lori Wilshire. Here. Older woman Clee, Vice Chair. And Mayor Jim Dodges. Alder Woman Clee contacted me to say that she has a health issue and could not come tonight. We have five here. All right. Next issue is public comment. Is there any member of the public who wishes to address the finance committee on any of tonight's agenda items? Lori Ordelano Nashua. I think the uh is the audit on the agenda. Yeah. I just had a couple things I wanted to mention about the audit. Um I'd like to try and understand why the report comes out so late. Like this is the 2024, 24-25 report for the closing, and it takes like 15, 16 months to get here, which seems like a long time and longer than it used to be. And I'm not certain how helpful it is when you're doing the next budget cycle when it still takes two budget cycles to get the information. Um I'd like to, and I think in the past it was done earlier, so there's something that makes it more difficult now to do that, and I'd like to understand that. Back maybe three years ago, I came here and I asked about discrepancies and how they get identified by the audit firm. And I understand that the firm, this isn't an audit, it's a review. And I think the firm depends on what the city provides it. But I raised the issue of a 7.1 million dollar loan that was taken out in support of the construction of an art center, and it's not on the financial statements. And if you follow GAP and Gatsby for your own policies, I don't understand why this loan never got recorded on the books and never got an answer to it. There's also a $9.5 million loan that the City of Nashua co-signed, and that's never been entered into the financial statements. And that was also relative to the art center. And even though that loan might have been prohibited under some of the RSA chapters when it came to loaning out money to a private company, the bottom line is we did. Uh it is a loan, and somehow it doesn't end up on our books. Um the other thing is in 2025, January, I filed a complaint with the DOJ regarding commingling of funds in our trust funds. And in January of 2026, the DOJ came out and said there was an issue, and the trust funds did have a commingling of funds. And I don't know how you come to realize this when you look at the 25. That was records based on 24 and 25. I don't know if the trust funds are part of this financial report, which would be the MS9s and tens. I think looking back at past reports, MS9s and tens were part of the review process, but I'm not certain they are now. And how how does that get caught analyzed? What does it mean, and what's the correction to that? So that's the commingling of funds that is not compliant with RSA 90A 91. I mean R the RSA, and I don't know the chapter. Um, the RSA's for independent accounting of trust fund money. Um, and the other thing is, you know, collecting outstanding property taxes. I wonder if an audit firm does anything to put pressure on a city to get those taxes collected, wastewater bills. 30 seconds per um I think that's an issue too.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com