Newport Zoning Board of Review Meeting - October 27, 2025
Newport Zoning Board of Review Meeting - October 27, 2025
The Newport Zoning Board of Review convened its regular monthly meeting on October 27, 2025, with a full roster of five voting members, an alternate, and a second alternate. The agenda began with a postponement of the Protective Club application and a withdrawal of the 51 Lawrence Street application, both without prejudice. The Board unanimously approved two summary calendar petitions for dimensional variances at 12 Gardner Street and 1 Bartlett Court, followed by an abbreviated calendar approval for a revision to existing variants at 125 Old Fort Road. The remainder of the evening focused on full hearings for two significant properties: a guesthouse conversion at 134-136 Spring Street and a redevelopment at 61-63 K Street, both of which received unanimous approval after extensive discussion on parking logistics, historic constraints, and neighborhood character.
Consent Calendar
- Petition of Brian Ross (12 Gardner Street): Unanimously approved dimensional variances to construct third-floor dormers reaching 33 feet height (exceeding the 30-foot limit) in an R10 zone. No objectors were present; the petition was granted with 12-month completion conditions.
- Petition of Lynn McKesson (1 Bartlett Court): Unanimously approved dimensional variances to convert an existing commercial unit back to a second dwelling unit on a 2,250 sq ft property (below the 5,000 sq ft requirement for two-family conversion). The applicant confirmed the business closed in July. The petition was granted with 12-month completion conditions.
- Petition of Stephen and Grace Turkot (125 Old Fort Road): Unanimously approved an abbreviated summary revision to increase a previously approved rear addition by 40.7 sq ft and a front porch by 52.5 sq ft, raising lot coverage to 33.6% (from an permitted 27.4%). The Board acknowledged the slight oversight due to design communication issues. The petition was granted with 12-month completion conditions.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Petitioners at 1 Gardner St and 1 Bartlett Ct: Mr. Ross and Ms. McKesson were confirmed to be present; no objections were raised, and the Board noted the lack of written or oral objectors allowed for summary handling.
- Petitioners at 125 Old Fort Rd: Mr. Turkot testified that the revision was due to a communication oversight between the designer and builder regarding furniture placement requirements, specifically to accommodate a bed.
- A1 Roofing/Construction LLC (134-136 Spring St): David Martlin (attorney) and Sean Napolitano (applicant) testified regarding the conversion to a five-bedroom guesthouse. They emphasized that the lot is 3,050 sq ft with significant physical constraints against on-site parking expansion. They proposed a lease for four off-site spaces at 130 Bellevue Avenue and argued that the guesthouse use is less intensive regarding parking than the prior college rentals.
- Real Estate Expert (James House): Testified that the lot's size (3,050 sq ft) creates a hardship where adding parking is physically impossible. He supported the petition, noting the location is a "walkers paradise" and that future owners may not maintain the same low-impact parking management, though the current applicant demonstrated strong stewardship.
- Public Comment (Ed Shea): Initially objected to limited parking but withdrew his objection after being informed of the proposed off-site lease agreement at 130 Bellevue Avenue.
- Public Comment (Cynthia Barton/Andy Barton - 61-63 K St): Testified that the family (three generations) requires the space; the mother plans to move in full-time after renovations. She denied allegations of illegal short-term rentals or RV storage, stating all tenants have had designated on-site parking.
- Neighbor Comment (Spiro Celiopolis, 38 Everett St): Stated he is in favor of the new garage remaining at its current location (1.7 ft setback) and that moving it back would negatively impact his property.
- Neighbor Comment (Elaine Nigro, 65 K St): Expressed concerns regarding privacy, noise, and fire danger due to the new structure being only 1 foot 7 inches from her property line, though she did not formally object. She requested that existing landscaping/screening be maintained.
- Neighbor Comment (Dorothy Durdan): Voice of public support, praising the applicant's past work on the historic property and the necessity of fixing the stairway configuration.
Discussion Items
- Parking at 134-136 Spring Street: Board members debated the adequacy of the off-site lease versus on-site stacking. Concerns were raised that designating specific spots at 130 Bellevue might take them off the public market with little use. The Board decided that a half-mile radius condition is sufficient without mandating dedicated marked spots, allowing flexibility if the location changes.
- Hardship at 134-136 Spring Street: Members agreed the hardship is the physical impossibility of expanding parking on the 3,050 sq ft lot. The Board noted that the guesthouse use (approx. 75% occupancy) is likely less parking-intensive than five college students.
- Setback and Height at 61-63 K Street: Discussion centered on the 1.7 ft side setback and 33'7" height variance for the stair tower. The Board acknowledged the historic context: moving the garage back to meet the 10 ft code would disrupt a neighbor's (McLaughlin) view corridor and gardens. The Historic District Commission (HDC) had already approved the siting.
- Parking at 61-63 K Street: Despite the variance for a two-way drive aisle, Board members were satisfied that the property's unique layout (semicircular driveway and linear drive) allows ample room for six vehicles without backing onto K Street. Mr. Jackson clarified that the driveway width does not meet code technically but is functionally sufficient.
- Future Stewardship: Members discussed the risk of future owners mismanaging the properties. For the K Street property, the Board noted the new owner's mother moving in full-time would likely mitigate noise concerns. For the Spring Street property, annual lease renewal conditions were proposed to ensure parking solutions remain in place.
Key Outcomes
- Continuance: The application for Protective Club (594-596 Thame Street) was continued to the November meeting at the applicant's request.
- Withdrawal: The application for 51 Lawrence Street was withdrawn without prejudice.
- Approved Petitions:
- 12 Gardner Street: Variance granted for dormers (33 ft height).
- 1 Bartlett Court: Variance granted for 2-unit conversion.
- 125 Old Fort Road: Revision granted for addition/porch expansion (33.6% coverage).
- A1 Roofing/134-136 Spring St: Approved with conditions: (1) Project start/complete within 12 months; (2) Off-site parking lease must be within a half-mile; (3) Advertising must indicate available spaces and direct parking away from the neighborhood; (4) Zoning officer must conduct a parking study; (5) Lease must be provided annually for license renewal. The Board explicitly decided against requiring dedicated, marked spots at 130 Bellevue to avoid wasting public parking capacity.
- Cynthia Barton/61-63 K St: Approved unanimously (5-0). The Board granted variances for side setback (1.7 ft), height (33'7"), two-way drive aisle, and special use permit for unit relocation. Conditions include 12-month completion and adherence to HDC site certification. The Board noted the hardship stems from existing structures and the desire to preserve neighbor views."
Meeting Transcript
I'll do that right up front. Yeah. Yep. Absolutely. Okay, folks. I'm going to open uh tonight's um regular monthly meeting of the Newport Zoning Board of Review. Uh today is uh Monday, October 27th, uh 2025. And uh we have our five regular voting members here, uh starting over on my left, Nicole Chevry. Uh we have uh Vice Chairman Dave Riley, we have our secretary, uh Russ Johnson, myself, Wick Rudd, and uh we also have Bart Grimes is also gonna be a voting member. And in addition, we have our first and second alternates. Uh uh first also is uh Melissa Padovina, our second alternate is uh Richard Berlinzer. So we've got a pretty much a full roster tonight of of people here. Um what we don't have is we don't have uh uh all of a sudden a full roster of uh hearings. Um I found out tonight when I came in that uh the first full hearing, which is gonna be for the protective club on Thame Street, has been uh has been postponed, I understand, until next month. Is that correct? And um at their behest, um they decided they wanted to regroup uh and come back next month. And so um do I need to make a motion for that, Nick, uh to continue that? Yeah, let's make a motion to continue. I'll entertain a motion to continue that, please. I'd like to entertain a motion to continue the application of 594-596 Thame Street LLC to the November meeting. Great. Can I have a second? Second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none. That has been moved. So anybody, the reason I did that at the beginning of the meeting is anybody who's here, either in favor of or objecting to the uh the protective club um variants that they're asking for um that will be heard next month, uh, not this month. So uh I understand they got word out, right, Nick, to their folks. So looks like that worked. Um moving on, uh, we did roll call, the minutes of September 22nd, 2025. Uh that would be our last meeting. Does anybody have any comments or can I entertain a motion to uh accept the minutes as written? Uh Ms. Chairman had one correction if I could. Sure. Um it's on the last uh the last uh uh petition, eight Peckham Avenue. Um what did I read? It lists that uh bot Grimes was uh uh uh the member who voted against the petition, and it was actually myself because bot was not uh uh at that meeting. Wasn't here wow, okay thank you. We wanted that correct. I uh I missed that. So just want to make that change. That's all too good about that, huh? You're not even here and you're voting things down. Okay. Um very good. Okay, so we'll correct that.
openpublica.com