The Newport Zoning Board of Review convened for its regular November meeting on Monday, November 24, 2025. The agenda included routine approvals, a summary calendar of four petitions, and three full hearing petitions. The Board unanimously approved the October 27 minutes, extended a permit expiration for 282 Thame Street, and allowed the withdrawal of a request for Atlantic Street. Four summary calendar petitions were approved unanimously, including one conditioned on restricted generator testing hours. The full hearing for 594-596 Thame Street was continued to January 2026 to allow for amendments regarding parking. The hearing for 22 Narragansett Avenue concluded with a 4-1 vote to approve the petition. A third full hearing petition, Three Butler Street, was continued to the December meeting.
594-596 Thame Street (Protective Club Expansion)
Supporters:
Objectors: Linda Stevenson (10 Dixon Street): Expressed opposition, arguing that the neighborhood has an acute parking shortage (citing a deficit of 18 spaces in nearby households) and that the expansion exacerbates this. She expressed concern regarding the loss of tree canopy, the increase in lot coverage, and the potential for the club to operate as an entertainment venue until 1 a.m. Gail Holmes (10 Dixon Street): Expressed opposition based on acoustic concerns regarding the proposed all-glass walls, arguing glass does not provide soundproofing and will propagate noise. She questioned the necessity of an entertainment license until 1 a.m. and argued that the club attracts 5,000 Instagram followers, indicating it is not just a local neighborhood bar. Chuck Boldock (10 Dixon Street): Expressed opposition to the physical plan and intensified use, arguing that a business of this nature should be located in a General Business district rather than a Limited Business zone adjacent to residential areas.
22 Narragansett Avenue (Roof Deck)
We're good. I love doing that. Ladies and gentlemen, uh, this is the uh regular November meeting of the Newport Zoning Board of Review. Uh today is Monday, uh uh excuse me, Monday, November 24th. And uh we've got a full schedule, so let's get right into it. Uh starting off the roll call of um of our members tonight. We will have a couple of different voting groups tonight due to recusals and other such uh things. Uh but uh our our to start off our uh our voting members will be uh Nicole Chevry, um our vice chairman Dave Riley, uh myself, Wick Rudd, uh Bark Rimes will be acting secretary today. Russell Johnson is not with us and uh sitting uh in review, except for one where she has to recuse herself is Melissa Padovina. She will be a voting member and uh Richard uh Richard Berlinski will be uh joining us on a couple of votes tonight um with different recusals happening. So we will have full five voting members for every uh petition that we have. Um and so moving on. Uh we want to uh have a uh we have the draft minutes of October 27th, 2025. Uh have we all reviewed that? Are there any comments on it? And if not, can I have a motion to accept those minutes, please? I moved it. We accept the minutes. Uh uh October 27th, uh 2025. Do I have a second? Second. All favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, that motion passes unanimously. Um now moving on to communications. We have another extension request for 282 Thame Street. Um Nick, this is the second 12-month extension that we we've had request? Correct. Okay. And is there any particular explanation for why they need you know that this this ex this extra 12 months? We in other words, we've already given them a 12-month extension. Is that correct? Correct. I believe they said that there was trouble getting uh the construction started, but the applicant may be here and he could probably explain that. Please. If you don't mind. Good evening, Tanner Jackson, on behalf of the applicant, the aim street, uh LLC. Um, so I submitted the extension request uh for an additional 12 months. I identified three issues that have prevented the construction of the uh rooftop uh service area. One is that the original project architect that did the design plans is no longer involved with the project. So the applicant has had to seek an additional architect to come on board and supervise the construction. They have since gotten another architect who's becoming is coming on board now. The other one is of course financing. This is an expensive project, and financing has just taken a little bit longer to get than originally anticipated. That has also been rectified, so that's no longer an issue. But that has prevented construction up until now. And then third, and then perhaps um most importantly, there's been water damage to the interior of the property with a mysterious leak that's been, they don't really know where it where it came from. Uh there have been multiple incursions with water over this past year, which have um occupied a lot of time identifying where the water's been coming in and how to fix it. And eventually the the roof was just repaired, and that has since fixed it.