OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Newport, Rhode Island/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Newport City Council Stormwater Utility and Sewer Rate Discussion - October 20, 2026

Meeting Portal — Tuesday, October 20, 2026
BodyNewport, Rhode Island
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, October 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 48:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:04

Good evening, everybody.

0:06

I'm uh Rob Schultz.

0:08

I lead the city city's utility department, and I want

Unassigned speaker

0:12

to

Speaker 1

0:12

on a high level just go over how we're paying for sanitary sewer and stormwaters today.

0:20

And uh this is to help the council uh for us to move forward with stormwater uh rules and ordinance change.

0:27

Uh one of the important things that I I want to make clear is that we're not setting any rates tonight and we're not changing any bills tonight, and so yeah.

0:56

Um tonight really is just about moving the ordinance forward.

1:03

Um the system is gonna need money either way.

1:07

We actually are trying to expedite the ordinance uh over what was proposed so that we cannot go forward with a 15% floor across the board increase.

1:19

Uh so we want to give council the option during the next budget cycle that they could keep the cost in the sewer bill, or we could move those costs over to a uh stormwater fee based on the hard surface area, so roofs, pavement, and every other things that are generating right

Unassigned speaker

1:35

off.

Speaker 1

1:36

So that's the choice is just keep it moving along, and we'll set the rates in that future.

1:41

Um, and those bills would only start once the entire program is done.

Unassigned speaker

1:47

So

Speaker 1

1:47

I want to kind of just quickly go over on a high level what what stormwater is.

1:51

So stormwater is any water that rains comes hits a roof, sidewalks, roadway, your own road, generating that, and it winds up in the city system, whether that's through drains, through a swale, through a stream, or rolls off into the harbor.

2:12

We fix all those pumps, pipes, we treat that rainwater before it reaches the bay, and we have to work to keep all that water clean.

2:21

We need to build and replace that system as we go, and the stormwater budget pays for a portion of that

Unassigned speaker

2:26

work,

Speaker 1

2:28

and what leaves that plant is clean, and we actually get criteria on what happens.

2:36

So, how did we get here?

2:38

Um, many of the northeast or older systems have combined systems, so they use one pipe to magically make everything disappear, and that's kind of why the sewer bill wound up paying for the majority of our stormwater cost.

2:51

We split the much of the system starting in the 70s, but some of that shared uh piping remains and and will remain.

3:00

And as we go through that,

Unassigned speaker

3:02

the

Speaker 1

3:03

federal grants helped a lot of that work was triggered in the 70s.

3:07

We've now made it through the focus from the sewer to getting to the stormwater.

3:12

We know stormwater is driving the water quality, flooding, and other impacts, and so as part of that long-term consent decree and the permits that we have, that's that transition point we're at now, and it makes sense to um start transitioning that.

3:28

Now, the major reason that we're looking to try to do this for July of 27 and not the July 1st of 28 as originally planned is the plant needed 20 million dollar bond.

3:40

That 20 million dollar bond came earlier, and so that money is is due sooner.

3:47

Um so who pays for rain today?

3:50

Any homeowner or business that uses water pays for it today.

3:53

It's hidden inside that water and sewer bill.

3:57

What doesn't pay or doesn't pay their share is anything that has a high impervious area.

4:02

It's oversimplified, but I'll use a paved lot.

4:06

Um that paved lot, say it's 24,000 square feet, and if it doesn't have that sewer or water account, it pays zero today.

4:14

And there's around a thousand of these accounts in the city.

4:18

So the thousand counts that are getting the benefit of that stormwater system that do not pay.

Unassigned speaker

4:25

Um the other element of it is a few large accounts pay for most of the sewer charges, and it's it's inverted if you were look at any best practices.

Speaker 1

4:37

This is not how you would want to set it up.

4:40

So the top five percent or around 470 of our accounts pay over 50 percent of the fee that we need to run that system around $8 million.

Unassigned speaker

4:50

The next 5% pay another eight and a half, nine percent, and then the remaining 90% of the accounts only make up 38, 40 percent of of what we need.

Speaker 1

5:02

And so it's a very narrow section of accounts that's really subject to quite a bit of changes.

5:18

No, the majority of them are going to be large water users.

5:22

If you were to look at our number one customer, it's actually Newport Housing.

5:41

Most of the estates in that actually don't meet that top 10%.

5:46

They would fall in the bottom 90%.

5:52

And so we've done a number of different presentations.

5:58

And this isn't again, we're kind of a moving target.

6:01

We don't know what the bond rate is.

6:02

We have some projections.

6:04

We don't know what some of the new contract stuff will be.

6:07

So we're looking at at ranges for that.

6:10

But basically, a low water using account with less roof and pavement would pay a little more.

6:18

If you had more roof and pavement, you'd pay quite a bit

Unassigned speaker

6:22

more.

Speaker 1

6:24

And so that's making up that difference.

6:26

If you had a typical, and there's no really no such thing as a typical, but say you use 3,000 gallons a month, which would be near our average for for a home, you'd actually probably pay slightly less or equal to what you're paying today.

6:42

And if you were a large water user, but in a typical home, you'd pay less because we're shifting that over, trying to recover those stormwater costs with what's driving them, and using that impervious area as a as a gauge.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management█████████████████████████████████████████████63%
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████19%
Taxation███████10%
Short Term Rentals██████8%
Summary of Proceedings

Newport City Council Stormwater Utility and Sewer Rate Discussion - October 20, 2026

Rob Schultz, head of the city's utility department, presented a high-level overview of how the city funds sanitary sewer and stormwater services, with the goal of moving forward a stormwater ordinance change. The presentation emphasized that no rates or bills were being set that evening; the purpose was to preserve the option for the council to decide between keeping stormwater costs in the sewer bill or shifting to a separate stormwater fee based on impervious surface area by July 1, 2027. The current system charges based on water usage, which the department considers inequitable because 5% of accounts (about 470) pay over 50% of the needed $8 million, while about 1,000 parcels with high impervious area but no water meter pay nothing.

Discussion Items

  • Proposed Stormwater Utility Timeline: Schultz explained that the original target of July 1, 2028, is being accelerated to July 1, 2027, due to an earlier-than-expected $20 million bond needed for the wastewater plant. The ordinance must pass two readings; the next council meeting (late October 2026) is the deadline to keep the timeline feasible. Missing that meeting could push the start to January or February 2027, making the July 1 target unrealistic.
  • Rate Increase Necessity: Schultz stated that without a stormwater utility, a minimum 15% across-the-board sewer rate increase would be required for fiscal year 2027 to cover bond payments (4.4%), operating cost increases (5%), and deferred repairs (5.5%). Even at 15%, $13 million in capital repairs would still be deferred. Waiting would not reduce costs, and the system has already lost roughly $9 million in deferred investment since 2019.
  • Credit Program and Customer Protections: The draft ordinance includes a credit program for properties that reduce runoff (e.g., rain barrels, pervious pavement, rain gardens). The credit manual is not final and will be developed through workshops with community groups. Other protections include no double billing, a 30-day correction period, and a three-year lookback for errors. Estimated letters sent in August did not start any clock.
  • Alternative Approaches: A public commenter argued for a simpler per-lot fee (like property tax) or a property tax-based system rather than a complex impervious-area-based fee. Schultz responded that a property tax would be subject to state levy caps, commingle enterprise funds with the general fund, and eliminate tools for development incentives and public-private partnerships. The proposed tiered approach (3-4 bands based on impervious area) is the most common among stormwater utilities and balances fairness with administrative burden.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • First Commenter: Expressed strong opposition to the proposed impervious-area-based fee, arguing it is administratively intensive, requires additional staffing (which the city cannot accommodate), and relies on imperfect drone estimates that missed structures (e.g., one neighbor's shed was not captured). He advocated for a flat per-lot fee, which is simpler and fairer, and criticized the department for not listening to public input from the four previous sessions. He also questioned the fairness of charging based on impervious area vs. lot size, citing his own property where a large lot absorbs most runoff.
  • Second Commenter: Questioned why the stormwater costs cannot be funded through property taxes, as everything is based on property value. He also asked about the city's bond capacity and noted that the tax cap might not be as restrictive as stated. Schultz replied that revenue bonds (tied to utility revenues) are different from general obligation bonds, and that the city council previously denied a request for general obligation bonds for this purpose. The bond market conditions are poor but refinancing is possible later.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or decisions were taken; the presentation was informational and aimed at gathering council feedback to move the ordinance forward.
  • The department committed to providing a draft credit manual by the following week for public review.
  • The council was urged to pass the enabling ordinance at the next meeting (late October) to preserve the July 1, 2027, stormwater utility timeline. Delays beyond November would likely make the timeline unfeasible.
  • The utility department will continue parallel work on the credit manual, outreach, and billing system development, contingent on council action.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everybody. I'm uh Rob Schultz. I lead the city city's utility department, and I want to on a high level just go over how we're paying for sanitary sewer and stormwaters today. And uh this is to help the council uh for us to move forward with stormwater uh rules and ordinance change. Uh one of the important things that I I want to make clear is that we're not setting any rates tonight and we're not changing any bills tonight, and so yeah. Um tonight really is just about moving the ordinance forward. Um the system is gonna need money either way. We actually are trying to expedite the ordinance uh over what was proposed so that we cannot go forward with a 15% floor across the board increase. Uh so we want to give council the option during the next budget cycle that they could keep the cost in the sewer bill, or we could move those costs over to a uh stormwater fee based on the hard surface area, so roofs, pavement, and every other things that are generating right off. So that's the choice is just keep it moving along, and we'll set the rates in that future. Um, and those bills would only start once the entire program is done. So I want to kind of just quickly go over on a high level what what stormwater is. So stormwater is any water that rains comes hits a roof, sidewalks, roadway, your own road, generating that, and it winds up in the city system, whether that's through drains, through a swale, through a stream, or rolls off into the harbor. We fix all those pumps, pipes, we treat that rainwater before it reaches the bay, and we have to work to keep all that water clean. We need to build and replace that system as we go, and the stormwater budget pays for a portion of that work, and what leaves that plant is clean, and we actually get criteria on what happens. So, how did we get here? Um, many of the northeast or older systems have combined systems, so they use one pipe to magically make everything disappear, and that's kind of why the sewer bill wound up paying for the majority of our stormwater cost. We split the much of the system starting in the 70s, but some of that shared uh piping remains and and will remain. And as we go through that, the federal grants helped a lot of that work was triggered in the 70s. We've now made it through the focus from the sewer to getting to the stormwater. We know stormwater is driving the water quality, flooding, and other impacts, and so as part of that long-term consent decree and the permits that we have, that's that transition point we're at now, and it makes sense to um start transitioning that. Now, the major reason that we're looking to try to do this for July of 27 and not the July 1st of 28 as originally planned is the plant needed 20 million dollar bond. That 20 million dollar bond came earlier, and so that money is is due sooner. Um so who pays for rain today? Any homeowner or business that uses water pays for it today. It's hidden inside that water and sewer bill. What doesn't pay or doesn't pay their share is anything that has a high impervious area. It's oversimplified, but I'll use a paved lot. Um that paved lot, say it's 24,000 square feet, and if it doesn't have that sewer or water account, it pays zero today. And there's around a thousand of these accounts in the city. So the thousand counts that are getting the benefit of that stormwater system that do not pay. Um the other element of it is a few large accounts pay for most of the sewer charges, and it's it's inverted if you were look at any best practices. This is not how you would want to set it up. So the top five percent or around 470 of our accounts pay over 50 percent of the fee that we need to run that system around $8 million. The next 5% pay another eight and a half, nine percent, and then the remaining 90% of the accounts only make up 38, 40 percent of of what we need. And so it's a very narrow section of accounts that's really subject to quite a bit of changes. No, the majority of them are going to be large water users. If you were to look at our number one customer, it's actually Newport Housing. Most of the estates in that actually don't meet that top 10%. They would fall in the bottom 90%. And so we've done a number of different presentations. And this isn't again, we're kind of a moving target.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com