OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/New York City, New York/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Oversight on Mental Health Care in NYC Jails and Three Introductions – September 23, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, September 23, 2026
BodyNew York City, New York
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:06:22

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Welcome today's New York City Council Hearing for the Committee on Criminal Justice.

0:04

Please silence all phones.

0:06

If you wish to speak in today's hearing, you could fill out an apparent's card with one of the sergeants moving forward.

0:12

No one is to approach the dance.

0:14

Chair, you may begin.

0:20

Thank you.

0:23

And good morning once again.

0:25

I am still Councilmember Sylvina Brooks Powers and I am the chair of the Committee on Criminal Justice.

0:30

I want to welcome everyone to today's hearing on mental health care in New York City jails.

0:36

The committee will also be hearing introduction number 809, sponsored by myself in relation to requiring the Department of Correction to create and implement policies to address medical needs during and after lock-ins.

0:51

Introduction 453, sponsored by Councilmember Stevens in relation to the provision of mental health services for children visiting incarcerated individuals.

1:00

And introduction number 133, sponsored by Councilmember Kaban in relation to extending the minimum duration of and updating of the requirements pertaining to the task force created to address policies related to the treatment and housing of transgender, gender nonconforming, non-binary, and intersex individuals in the custody of the Department of Correction.

1:25

I am joined by Council members Morano, Narcis, Brewer, and Kaban.

1:40

Ensuring that people in custody with mental health needs receive appropriate care while navigating a system that was never designed to serve as a substitute for a comprehensive behavioral or mental health system.

1:54

Today, approximately 60% of people in city jails have a documented mental health need.

2:01

And approximately one in five people in custody has been identified as having a serious mental illness.

2:09

For many New Yorkers in custody, incarceration has become the point at which they first receive consistent access to mental health services.

2:19

Specialized units and treatment models exist, but the prevalence of serious mental illness in our jails raises important questions about whether individuals are receiving care at the appropriate level, whether treatment is accessible when needed, and whether the current system is equipped to support people with complex behavioral health needs.

2:44

People experiencing serious mental illness may require consistent medication management, therapeutic services, and specialized housing to prevent further deterioration.

2:57

When access to care is disrupted, whether because of missed appointments, staffing challenges, housing limitations, or operational issues, those disruptions can have serious implications for individuals' health and safety.

3:13

Today's hearing will examine the continuum of mental health care available within city jails, including mental observation units, programmed to accelerate clinical effectiveness or PACE units, and the city's new outposted therapeutic housing units.

3:32

We will examine how these programs function, how individuals are identified for placement, how quickly they can access appropriate levels of care, and whether existing capacity meets the needs of the current jail population.

3:50

The committee will also examine concerns regarding access to treatment during jail operations, including the impact of lock-ins on medical and mental health appointments.

4:00

When individuals are unable to access scheduled care, particularly those with serious mental illness who rely on consistent treatment.

4:09

It is critical that there are clear procedures to ensure continuity of care.

4:16

As the city works towards closing Rikers Island and transition into a borough-based jail system, these questions take on added urgency.

4:25

This transition can only happen successfully if our jail population is reduced.

4:32

And if a substantial share of the population is not having their mental health needs met, then we are not moving towards our goal.

4:40

Meeting these needs through treatment inside our jails today, through discharge planning and through diversion to keep people out of custody in the first place, is not separate from the closure plan.

4:51

It is a necessity for it.

5:00

For that reason, today's hearing aims to better this council's understanding on how mental health care is provided to the individuals currently housed in our jails, and what additional investments or reforms are needed to ensure that incarceration does not become the default response to unmet behavioral needs, health needs.

5:18

I would like to thank my staff and committee staff for their hard work.

5:23

Jahari Frazier, counsel to the committee, Chad Benjamin, policy analyst, Casey Lasky, financial analysts, Owen Brady, my policy and budget director, and Renee Taylor, my chief of staff.

5:36

I look forward to a productive discussion about how we can strengthen mental health care within our jail system, improve access to treatment, and ensure that New Yorkers and custody receive the support and services they need.

5:51

With that, I am going to pause to allow Councilmember Cabine to give remarks pertaining to her bill.

5:59

Thank you, Chair.

6:00

Good morning.

6:01

Entering Rikers Island is a potential death sentence for any New Yorker, but that is doubly true for trans, non-binary, and gender nonconforming people who are incarcerated there.

6:11

And on top of the other dangers and indignities of incarceration at Rikers, transgender nonconforming, nonbinary, and intersex individuals are routinely denied access to housing that matches their gender identity.

6:22

They're forced to live in an environment where they face discrimination and the risk of violence.

6:26

And I saw that firsthand as my time in my time as a public defender.

6:31

You know, it's unconscionable that in this city we are treating queer folks like this.

6:36

The task force on issues faced by TGNC NBI people in custody has already done crucial oversight to bring this to the attention of council members, members of the administration, community-based organizations, and the public at large.

6:49

Their 2022 report did remarkable work, bringing the experiences of trans and non-binary New Yorkers in DOC custody to light.

6:57

Their work is so vital because we cannot pass legislation without understanding the nature and scale of the issue at hand.

7:03

They need not just a mandate, but our full support.

7:07

And that is why it is essential that we pass my bill, intro 133 to extend this task force and ensure that the DOC and correctional health services substantively participate in its work.

7:17

And I want to say that alongside intro 133, I've also put forward intro 134, which would give New Yorkers incarcerated at Rikers recourse to be housed in units where they will be safe from gender based and sexual violence.

7:28

And so I hope that we can consider that bill to act on the recommendations of the task force.

7:33

Thank you to Chair Brooks Prowers and to my colleagues for supporting the bill, the folks that have signed on, and I'm I'm really glad that it's being heard today.

7:42

Thank you, Chair.

7:46

Thank you.

7:51

I'm gonna ask for the administration testifying to come to the dais.

8:33

Do you affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth before the committee and to respond honestly to council member questions?

8:40

All right, thank you.

8:41

You may be giving ready.

8:47

Thank you.

8:48

Good morning, Chair Brooks Powers and members of the committee on criminal justice.

8:52

My name is Dr.

8:53

Joseph Otanakar.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Mental Health Awareness█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Criminal Justice Reform██████████████16%
LGBTQ+████████10%
Public Safety████████9%
Youth Programs███4%
Procedural███4%
Public Health██2%
Homelessness██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Oversight on Mental Health Care in New York City Jails – September 23, 2026

The New York City Council Committee on Criminal Justice, chaired by Selvena N. Brooks-Powers, held a hearing on September 23, 2026, to examine mental health care in city jails, including specialized housing, medication access, discharge planning, and the impact of lock-ins. The committee also heard three introductions: Int 0133 (extending the TGNC/NBI task force), Int 0453 (mental health referrals for children visiting incarcerated individuals), and Int 0809 (policies for medical needs during lock-ins). All three introductions were laid over by the committee.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Legal Aid Society (Barbara Hamilton): Reported that clients with serious mental illness are often deadlocked (isolated) for extended periods without meaningful treatment, citing a client deadlocked for about a year (on and off) as of spring 2026, and another in a PACE unit denied recreation and basic hygiene supplies. Contradicted DOC’s sworn testimony that deadlocking is not occurring.
  • New York County Defender Services (Raji Deyat Mangalum): Shared success stories of two clients diverted to community-based treatment via alternative-to-incarceration (ATI) courts, urging the council to support the Treatment Court Expansion Act to divert more people from jail.
  • Task Force Advocates (Ethan Lowe, Lucas Marquez, Rachel Golden, Maya Zelkind, Camila Ruda): Expressed strong support for Int 0133 with amendments to strengthen task force independence, and urged passage of Int 0134 (gender-aligned housing protections). Testimony from a formerly incarcerated trans woman described repeated sexual assault and denial of gender-aligned housing.
  • Freedom Agenda (Darren Mack): Called for immediate investments in community-based housing and mental health services, noting that 49.6% of people leaving Rikers with a mental health diagnosis return within a year. Supported Int 0134.
  • Independent Rikers Commission (Zachary Katzen Nelson): Criticized DOC for failing to implement new deadlocking prevention measures beyond telling staff to stop, and noted that crisis intervention training has fallen apart.
  • Osborne Association (Tereny Garamella): Opposed Int 0453 as written, arguing DOC should not assess children’s mental health; instead, community-based resources should be made available at visiting areas.
  • Women’s Prison Association (Miriam Goodman): Opposed Int 0453, stating that trauma-responsive care cannot be provided by the correctional system; invested in community-based providers.
  • CACES (Nadia Chite): Described a client released without a needed long-acting injectable, Medicaid set to inactive, and no prescription sent to a pharmacy – highlighting systemic failures in discharge planning.
  • Justice for Families (Janet Bocanegra): Strongly opposed Int 0453, warning that assessments could lead to child welfare involvement; urged investment in community resources.
  • Exalt Youth (Giselle Castro): Supported all three introductions but emphasized need for multi-year flexible contracts for frontline organizations.
  • Other speakers (Urban Justice Center, Make the Road New York, Exodus Transitional Community, Children of Promise NYC, and individuals with lived experience): Generally supported Int 0133 and Int 0134, opposed Int 0453 as written, and called for expanded community-based mental health services, better discharge planning, and diversion from jail.

Discussion Items

  • Oversight – Mental Health Care in City Jails: Chair Brooks-Powers opened with statistics: 60% of people in city jails have a documented mental health need, and approximately 1 in 5 has a serious mental illness (SMI). Dr. Otanakar (CHS) testified that 61% of patients receive mental health services and 22% have SMI. He described the continuum of care: general population (outpatient model), 17 Mental Observation (MO) units (629 patients), STEP, and 10 PACE units (including a 20-bed unit at Bellevue). CHS reported that about 10% of mental health appointments are missed due to non-production (no escort, alarm, lockdown). IBO presented analysis: of 19,000 discharges in FY26, 58% had a history of mental illness, 30% had both mental illness and homelessness, and 93% of TGNC/NBI individuals had mental illness history. Councilmembers questioned DOC and CHS on housing placements, medication access, the 83% increase in SMI since 2022, and the impact of lockdowns on care.
  • Int 0133 – Extending the TGNC/NBI Task Force: Councilmember Cabán sponsored the bill to extend the task force. She noted that trans, non-binary, and intersex individuals face discrimination and violence in DOC custody. Advocates supported the bill but urged amendments to ensure independent administration, meaningful agency participation, and transparency. DOC expressed support for the task force but had not implemented key recommendations (e.g., automatic independent review of housing denials). DOC data showed 106 denials out of 231 applications for gender-aligned housing in FY26.
  • Int 0453 – Mental Health Services for Children Visiting Incarcerated Individuals: Councilmember Stevens sponsored the bill, sharing a personal story of a young person who needed support after a parent’s incarceration. DOC stated it does not believe it is the best agency to deliver these services, and advocates strongly opposed the bill as written, warning of potential surveillance and child welfare involvement. The bill was laid over.
  • Int 0809 – Medical Needs During Lock-Ins: Chair Brooks-Powers sponsored the bill. DOC testified that 0.1% of missed medical appointments in 2026 were due to lock-ins, but the department could not provide granular data on lock-in frequency or duration. CHS said it works to reschedule missed appointments. Chair expressed frustration that DOC came without data to inform the legislation.
  • Deadlocking Allegations: DOC testified that deadlocking (isolating individuals in cells, often without access to care) is not occurring and that any past allegations were investigated. However, Legal Aid testified that in 2026 they have clients who have been deadlocked, citing ongoing court proceedings. This direct contradiction was noted.
  • Discharge Planning and Compliance: CHS reported it is close to full staffing of social workers (only one vacancy), but IBO and advocates noted persistent gaps in ensuring released individuals have medication, Medicaid, and community appointments. The Brad H. settlement remains a concern.

Key Outcomes

  • All three introductions (Int 0133, Int 0453, Int 0809) were laid over by the committee (no vote taken). The committee will consider further amendments and testimony.
  • Chair Brooks-Powers publicly requested that all agencies submit testimony at least 24 hours in advance of future hearings, expressing frustration that the administration failed to do so for this hearing, impeding meaningful preparation.
  • The committee will follow up on deadlocking allegations after Legal Aid provided information about current court orders and clients in isolation.
  • DOC committed to providing additional data on lock-in frequency, duration, and reasons, as well as on the clinic production dashboard pilot.
  • Multiple public testimonies urged the council to pass Int 0134 (gender-aligned housing protections), which was not on today’s agenda but was referenced as a priority by advocates and co-sponsored by the chair.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome today's New York City Council Hearing for the Committee on Criminal Justice. Please silence all phones. If you wish to speak in today's hearing, you could fill out an apparent's card with one of the sergeants moving forward. No one is to approach the dance. Chair, you may begin. Thank you. And good morning once again. I am still Councilmember Sylvina Brooks Powers and I am the chair of the Committee on Criminal Justice. I want to welcome everyone to today's hearing on mental health care in New York City jails. The committee will also be hearing introduction number 809, sponsored by myself in relation to requiring the Department of Correction to create and implement policies to address medical needs during and after lock-ins. Introduction 453, sponsored by Councilmember Stevens in relation to the provision of mental health services for children visiting incarcerated individuals. And introduction number 133, sponsored by Councilmember Kaban in relation to extending the minimum duration of and updating of the requirements pertaining to the task force created to address policies related to the treatment and housing of transgender, gender nonconforming, non-binary, and intersex individuals in the custody of the Department of Correction. I am joined by Council members Morano, Narcis, Brewer, and Kaban. Ensuring that people in custody with mental health needs receive appropriate care while navigating a system that was never designed to serve as a substitute for a comprehensive behavioral or mental health system. Today, approximately 60% of people in city jails have a documented mental health need. And approximately one in five people in custody has been identified as having a serious mental illness. For many New Yorkers in custody, incarceration has become the point at which they first receive consistent access to mental health services. Specialized units and treatment models exist, but the prevalence of serious mental illness in our jails raises important questions about whether individuals are receiving care at the appropriate level, whether treatment is accessible when needed, and whether the current system is equipped to support people with complex behavioral health needs. People experiencing serious mental illness may require consistent medication management, therapeutic services, and specialized housing to prevent further deterioration. When access to care is disrupted, whether because of missed appointments, staffing challenges, housing limitations, or operational issues, those disruptions can have serious implications for individuals' health and safety. Today's hearing will examine the continuum of mental health care available within city jails, including mental observation units, programmed to accelerate clinical effectiveness or PACE units, and the city's new outposted therapeutic housing units. We will examine how these programs function, how individuals are identified for placement, how quickly they can access appropriate levels of care, and whether existing capacity meets the needs of the current jail population. The committee will also examine concerns regarding access to treatment during jail operations, including the impact of lock-ins on medical and mental health appointments. When individuals are unable to access scheduled care, particularly those with serious mental illness who rely on consistent treatment. It is critical that there are clear procedures to ensure continuity of care. As the city works towards closing Rikers Island and transition into a borough-based jail system, these questions take on added urgency. This transition can only happen successfully if our jail population is reduced. And if a substantial share of the population is not having their mental health needs met, then we are not moving towards our goal. Meeting these needs through treatment inside our jails today, through discharge planning and through diversion to keep people out of custody in the first place, is not separate from the closure plan. It is a necessity for it. For that reason, today's hearing aims to better this council's understanding on how mental health care is provided to the individuals currently housed in our jails, and what additional investments or reforms are needed to ensure that incarceration does not become the default response to unmet behavioral needs, health needs. I would like to thank my staff and committee staff for their hard work. Jahari Frazier, counsel to the committee, Chad Benjamin, policy analyst, Casey Lasky, financial analysts, Owen Brady, my policy and budget director, and Renee Taylor, my chief of staff. I look forward to a productive discussion about how we can strengthen mental health care within our jail system, improve access to treatment, and ensure that New Yorkers and custody receive the support and services they need. With that, I am going to pause to allow Councilmember Cabine to give remarks pertaining to her bill. Thank you, Chair. Good morning. Entering Rikers Island is a potential death sentence for any New Yorker, but that is doubly true for trans, non-binary, and gender nonconforming people who are incarcerated there. And on top of the other dangers and indignities of incarceration at Rikers, transgender nonconforming, nonbinary, and intersex individuals are routinely denied access to housing that matches their gender identity. They're forced to live in an environment where they face discrimination and the risk of violence. And I saw that firsthand as my time in my time as a public defender. You know, it's unconscionable that in this city we are treating queer folks like this. The task force on issues faced by TGNC NBI people in custody has already done crucial oversight to bring this to the attention of council members, members of the administration, community-based organizations, and the public at large. Their 2022 report did remarkable work, bringing the experiences of trans and non-binary New Yorkers in DOC custody to light. Their work is so vital because we cannot pass legislation without understanding the nature and scale of the issue at hand. They need not just a mandate, but our full support. And that is why it is essential that we pass my bill, intro 133 to extend this task force and ensure that the DOC and correctional health services substantively participate in its work. And I want to say that alongside intro 133, I've also put forward intro 134, which would give New Yorkers incarcerated at Rikers recourse to be housed in units where they will be safe from gender based and sexual violence. And so I hope that we can consider that bill to act on the recommendations of the task force. Thank you to Chair Brooks Prowers and to my colleagues for supporting the bill, the folks that have signed on, and I'm I'm really glad that it's being heard today.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com