STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The New York City Council Committee on General Welfare, chaired by Crystal Hudson, met at 1:00 PM on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, in Hearing Room 3 at 250 Broadway for an oversight hearing on shelter safety and to consider two transparency bills. Members present included Hudson, Avilés, Morano, Nurse, Ung, and Wilson; Councilmember Brewer and Public Advocate Williams also attended. The committee heard from a formerly homeless panel, public witnesses, and Department of Social Services and Department of Homeless Services leadership, then laid over both proposed bills.
Good afternoon. Welcome to the Committee on General Welfare. At this time, we ask that you please silence all electronics. If you wish to testify, please see one of the sergeant at arms in the back. And at no point, please do not approach the dais. Chair, you may begin. Thank you. Good afternoon. I'm Crystal Hudson, chair of the New York City Council's General Welfare Committee, and my pronouns are she her. Thank you all for joining us for today's hearing on shelter safety. We are additionally joined by Council members Morano, Ung, and Wilson. Sorry, I thought there was somebody else over there. Um every New Yorker deserves a safe place to live, including New Yorkers who turn to the city for shelter during a period of crisis. Shelter must be more than a roof over someone's head. It must be a place where people can rest without fear of violence, access the support they need, and be treated with respect. However, we have heard too many concerns about conditions that can make shelters unsafe, including deteriorating facilities, overcrowding, violence, theft, and insufficient staffing. When people feel that entering a shelter puts their safety, security, or dignity at risk, they may choose not to enter shelter at all. Some of the major safety issues we will look at today include not just security incidents such as arrests, thefts, or violence, but also how the shelter systems systems design can impact physical and mental health and well-being, exacerbate trauma, and deter New Yorkers from engaging with our shelter system and making use of the robust social safety net DSS can provide. The New York City shelter system is sprawling. In the 1980s, a series of lawsuits resulted in the establishment of a right to shelter in New York City. This was an incredibly important step towards serving unhoused New Yorkers and resulted in the city needing to increase shelter capacity. Over the last 40 years, the number of shelters and the shelter population has grown. Just this past Sunday, over 83,000 individuals slept in our shelters. Today, there are over 500 shelters throughout the city that serve single adults, adult families, and families with children. The majority of shelters are operated by contracted nonprofit organizations. And while most of these organizations are dedicated to serving New Yorkers, third-party contracting can result in oversight and compliance challenges, including sometimes funding unscrupulous actors, subsidizing exorbitant executive salaries, or inadvertently developing contracts that force providers to focus more on volume than long-term sustainable outcomes and client well-being. Further, the additional layer of administration can make it difficult for providers to make essential repairs or changes to premises that improve safety and security. Last week at our joint hearing with the Committee on Veterans, for example, we heard about the difficult and length lengthy process for making essential repairs to the Borden Avenue veterans' residence, resulting in a multi-year process to repair a leaking roof. Today's hearing is an opportunity to hear from DSS about how they address shelter safety concerns, conduct oversight of challenges to shelter safety, and to hear from the public about what the city can do better. In addition to today's oversight on shelter safety, we will also consider two bills intended to strengthen transparency and accountability in the shelter system. Introduction 99, sponsored by Councilmember Gail Brewer, would require the Department of Homeless Services to report annually on the number of families with children placed in shelters in the same or an adjoining zip code as their last address. Councilmember Brewer, I now pass to you to make a statement about the legislation you're sponsoring today. Thank you very much. Families entering the shelter system, as you uh know, should be able to remain close to their schools, their child care, their doctors, their jobs, and their community support networks whenever possible. Placing families far from their former homes creates additional hardships, particularly for families with young children who rely on nearby child care and family support. We in the council and the public need to know how often families are placed in shelters in their former zip code or an adjoining zip code. Currently, this information is not regularly reported. Intro 99 requires DHS to report annually on shelter placements with data broken down by borough and by families with children under age three and those with older children. I believe that this reporting will help the council identify where families are being displaced from their communities and push for shelter placement policies that minimize disruption to children's lives. I must admit, during the issue when we had so many wonderful migrants here, I really appreciated the work that the Adams administration did despite all the challenges and housing people with DSS at the time. We work really hard to keep if people move shelters to keep them in their uh school zone. And to me, uh, based on all of this uh criteria to remain close, schools are the most important. And I want this bill particularly to try to keep the families near their schools. The absenteeism at DOE, or whatever the hell it's called now, New York City Public Schools, um, is huge. And I have a horrible feeling that part of it is because people just can't get to school.