Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The North Salem Planning Board held a work session on April 16, 2025, to continue refining draft regulations for short-term rentals. The board reviewed the April 3rd draft line-by-line, incorporating feedback from the Town Board meeting and legal research. Key topics included definitions, operational standards, enforcement mechanisms, and coordination with existing codes. The board reached several consensus decisions and tasked Planning Board member Will with incorporating changes for a final review at the May 7th regular meeting, after which the proposal will be forwarded to the Town Board for a public hearing.
Okay, I'm gonna call the uh planning board meeting to order. Uh the first item on the agenda asked to be held over to the May meeting. So we're gonna go right into the work session, short-term rentals. Um I did take the matter over to the town board and gave them an overview of what we were doing, and generally speaking, they agreed that we are on the right track. Um it was a little rough going in that um Supervisor Lucas thought that we were regulating for more than 30 days, and I think what happened here is that remember initially we were going to say that you couldn't do anything less than 30 days. So we kind of had that mindset, but eventually he um he caught on and he said we're on the right track, so that was good. Um several good comments came up at the town board meeting, and I'd like to take the time to go through each of those, um, as well as some of the ones that um I had, and I'm sure that some of you have on this last one. So we're working off of the April 3rd draft. Um correct? Yeah, yes, okay. So um I don't have anything on the first page, but on the second page, um at some point I talked about using including the professional office district, and as most of you know, we have single family homes in the professional office district. We have them in the GB district, the professional office district. I'm not sure if we have any in the NB district. Um so I should look at that. Maybe I thought we said there were. Well, definitely PO and definitely GB. The NB is uh right here at North Salem Center. And I just want to see if the house down the road is in it. No. No. There's none at Salem Center and up. Uh the Trump House is in. I no, no, it's not. So we don't we don't have any homes in the NB districts. So we could eliminate that if we wanted to, or just add the PO district. Well, I definitely think we should add the PO if there is a home in the PO district, but I mean NB, I guess if there's none, there's no reason to include it. Unless in the future would there be one in the future? Is that possible? It's anything's possible with an administration changing the boundaries of districts. So let's let's add PO and um keep the NB. I would just just highlight the NB for now. Will I'm gonna go and do a um a double check on the town's GIS, but looking at the map, it appears as though we probably shouldn't bother with the NB district. Okay. Um also on that page under the definition of dwelling unit. The can you remind me, Will, why we have the highlighting there? Is that something you were suggesting? I think on the next page it tells us if that's staying or going. Highlighting on the definition of dwelling. Uh the definition of dwelling, you have boarding or rooming house, fraternity house, and inner lodging highlighted in yellow. Um