OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Salem, New York/Town Board & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Salem Planning Board Work Session: September 3, 2025 – Short-Term Rentals & Croton Falls Update

Town Board & Boards — Wednesday, September 3, 2025
BodyNorth Salem, New York
SessionTown Board & Boards
DateWednesday, September 3, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:46:17

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:04

Okay.

0:04

I'm calling to order the planning board meeting of September 3rd.

0:11

The first item on the agenda, the public hearing is for the Grant Road LLC, is going to be carried over to the October meeting.

0:18

Before we get into the work session, I'll give you an update on some recent happenings over the past couple of weeks.

0:37

So I ended up doing that.

0:39

I had to throw together a PowerPoint, a 10-minute PowerPoint while it was on Nantucket, it's all started.

0:48

Came back, and thanks to Maria Holeschko, I got it thrown together and this morning presented to them.

0:56

I did a brief overview of course the whole Croton Falls plan, which you know, emphasizing the limitations because of Route 22 that goes right through the middle of it, its narrowness, difficulty to get crosswalks in and sidewalks, no recommendation to expand the zoning.

1:17

And that's like a multi-level issue with infrastructure because if you add more commercial and their wet uses, it's going to draw more on the water supply, which isn't that great.

1:27

They just drilled well number four, and that's going to go into service, and they have to be filtered, and that's very costly.

1:34

And we've got the proposed sewer district coming in and went through the whole thing, the historic character, etc.

Unassigned speaker

1:41

And

Speaker 1

1:41

I kind of anticipated at least one of the questions at the end, and that was about affordable housing and more opportunities for affordable housing.

1:50

So, you know, I mentioned the ones that were there.

1:53

Um, who knows?

1:56

It is GB district does have multifamily housing and multi-family affordable housing if someone wanted to do

Unassigned speaker

2:03

it.

Speaker 1

2:03

Um after a couple of questions going back on affordable housing, I said, but one of the things we also have to keep an eye on as a responsible municipality is yes, we support affordable housing, we amended our um code

Unassigned speaker

2:21

uh

Speaker 1

2:21

to be in line with the county's model ordinance, but the next level of housing, you know, the 300,000, 400,000, which we have a lot of in that area, it's just as important to keep that affordable for the people who are currently living there.

2:37

And when you add more layers of infrastructure in those costs, that's going to impact them.

2:42

So we're trying to look at the bigger picture of you don't want

Unassigned speaker

2:46

a

Speaker 1

2:46

town of affordable housing and then million dollar homes.

2:49

You want to preserve all the ones in between, otherwise those people are going to end

Unassigned speaker

2:53

up

Speaker 1

2:54

needing affordable housing.

2:56

So you're creating another problem there.

2:58

So I hope one of the board members went, mmm, it's like your first time he heard it presented in that way.

3:04

And I I think it's very important.

3:06

I've always kept my eye on all the different levels of housing opportunities.

3:11

Um, and I think that's important for Croton Falls.

3:14

And uh the other one, which

Unassigned speaker

3:16

I

Speaker 1

3:16

never thought of doing as part of this plan because the area is so small and the development potential is not gonna be increased that much with the sewer, you know, is already a fair number of apartments.

3:29

There can be a couple more apartments above stores,

Unassigned speaker

3:32

um,

Speaker 1

3:32

and there are a few accessory apartments, but they said you don't have a build-out.

3:36

You know, how many new um homes are you projecting with this plan?

3:42

And um I said, no, we didn't do it.

3:44

And I said, you know, it's it's a good point.

3:46

I'll talk to the board about it.

3:48

Um I said normally you would do something like that when you do a whole comprehensive plan for a town, and I said that's something the town board is thinking about its time.

3:56

It's 2011, it's now 2025.

3:59

It's time to consider

Unassigned speaker

4:01

that.

Speaker 1

4:01

But um,

Unassigned speaker

4:02

I

Speaker 1

4:02

don't know if the town board even wants us to even bother to do that, but that's something that's a question I think that the town board needs to answer, whether

Unassigned speaker

4:10

we

Speaker 1

4:10

do a projected build

Unassigned speaker

4:12

out.

Speaker 1

4:12

Um, and it might tie in very nicely with the proposed sewer district,

Unassigned speaker

4:16

and

Speaker 1

4:16

I'll talk to Jim Hahn about that because in preparing a map plan and report for a proposed sewer district, we took all of the information from the water district usage, and in doing that, when I did an Excel spreadsheet of all the properties, I also did a description of each property, which ones had accessory apartments,

Unassigned speaker

4:38

um,

Speaker 1

4:38

which one some of them are two family, etc.

4:41

So by all of that data is already on an Excel spreadsheet.

4:44

Um, so it wouldn't take much to project

Speaker 2

4:48

if

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Short Term Rentals█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Zoning And Land Use███████████████████████████29%
Procedural████████9%
Legal And Compliance███████7%
Public Engagement████4%
Affordable Housing█1%
Privacy Concerns█1%
Signage█1%
Summary of Proceedings

North Salem Planning Board Work Session – September 3, 2025

The Planning Board met on September 3, 2025, at 7:00 PM to carry over a public hearing, discuss proposed short-term rental regulations, review a petition from Purdy’s Hamlet residents, and handle routine business. The chair also reported on a presentation made that morning to the Westchester County Planning Board regarding the Croton Falls Master Plan. The board worked through a revised draft of the short-term rental ordinance, making key decisions on owner limits, zoning bulk requirements, and permit enforcement.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A petition signed by approximately 40 Purdy’s Hamlet residents was submitted, arguing that short-term rentals would harm property values, increase traffic and congestion, strain police and garbage services, and create fire/safety burdens on taxpayers. The chair reviewed the petition point by point, calling many claims unfounded and noting that the draft code already addresses these concerns through conditioning uses, annual fire inspections (with fees), and noise/occupancy limits. Board members noted that similar concerns have been raised in other North Salem hamlets (e.g., Peach Lake) and that enforcement of the code will be critical.

Discussion Items

  • Carryover of Public Hearing (Grant Road LLC, 658 Grant Road): The public hearing was carried over to the October 1, 2025 regular meeting without discussion.
  • Croton Falls Master Plan Update: The chair summarized her 10-minute presentation to the Westchester County Planning Board that morning. She emphasized the limitations imposed by Route 22 (narrowness, difficulty for crosswalks), the lack of recommendation to expand zoning, infrastructure constraints (water supply and proposed sewer district), and the need to preserve “missing middle” housing (homes in the $300,000–$500,000 range) to avoid creating more demand for affordable housing. She noted that the county asked for a build-out projection, which the board may consider as part of a broader comprehensive plan.
  • Short-Term Rental Ordinance (Work Session):
    • The board reviewed a new draft prepared by Will and Lisa. Key decisions included:
      • Deleted the NB district from eligibility because it contains no homes; kept GB district with a bulk requirement of 20,000 square feet (bulk table “K”), mirroring the adjacent R‑1 ½ zone.
      • Clarified that short-term rentals are a permitted accessory use subject to a conditional use permit (not by right).
      • Owner occupancy: An owner may hold only one short-term rental permit in the town, regardless of the number of properties owned. Long-term rentals are unaffected.
      • Permit duration and renewal: Permits are for two years; new owners must obtain their own permit.
      • Eligibility period: New owners must own the property for two years before applying for a short-term rental permit.
      • Violations: Operating without a permit will be handled by the building inspector through existing code (fines, court), not through an ineligibility provision. However, the board voted to add a minimum 12‑month ineligibility for permit revocations based on false information.
      • The board removed the “ineligibility” language from the general violation section (F2) and kept the revocation/suspension powers for permit holders.
      • Accessory apartments: Pre‑existing non‑conforming accessory apartments were discussed; the board will seek legal advice from Lisa on whether a change of ownership can trigger a requirement to obtain a new special permit.
      • Quarterly log reports: The board agreed that logs need only record dates and number of occupants, not names, to verify compliance with occupancy limits.
    • The board expects to finalize the draft at its September 17 work session and then refer it to the Town Board.
  • Signs: The board discussed whether to allow temporary directional signs for community events in public rights‑of‑way. No action was taken due to liability concerns (sight‑distance, accidents) and existing code prohibition. The zoning enforcement officer will continue to pull signs from rights‑of‑way.

Key Outcomes

  • Public hearing (Grant Road LLC) carried over to October 1, 2025.
  • Short‑term rental draft: Substantial revisions agreed upon; final review set for September 17 work session.
  • Financial report for August 2025 approved unanimously.
  • Minutes of August 6 and August 20, 2025 approved unanimously.
  • Next meetings: Work session – September 17, 2025; Regular meeting – October 1, 2025.
  • Executive session: The board entered executive session with counsel to discuss a legal matter, then adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. I'm calling to order the planning board meeting of September 3rd. The first item on the agenda, the public hearing is for the Grant Road LLC, is going to be carried over to the October meeting. Before we get into the work session, I'll give you an update on some recent happenings over the past couple of weeks. So I ended up doing that. I had to throw together a PowerPoint, a 10-minute PowerPoint while it was on Nantucket, it's all started. Came back, and thanks to Maria Holeschko, I got it thrown together and this morning presented to them. I did a brief overview of course the whole Croton Falls plan, which you know, emphasizing the limitations because of Route 22 that goes right through the middle of it, its narrowness, difficulty to get crosswalks in and sidewalks, no recommendation to expand the zoning. And that's like a multi-level issue with infrastructure because if you add more commercial and their wet uses, it's going to draw more on the water supply, which isn't that great. They just drilled well number four, and that's going to go into service, and they have to be filtered, and that's very costly. And we've got the proposed sewer district coming in and went through the whole thing, the historic character, etc. And I kind of anticipated at least one of the questions at the end, and that was about affordable housing and more opportunities for affordable housing. So, you know, I mentioned the ones that were there. Um, who knows? It is GB district does have multifamily housing and multi-family affordable housing if someone wanted to do it. Um after a couple of questions going back on affordable housing, I said, but one of the things we also have to keep an eye on as a responsible municipality is yes, we support affordable housing, we amended our um code uh to be in line with the county's model ordinance, but the next level of housing, you know, the 300,000, 400,000, which we have a lot of in that area, it's just as important to keep that affordable for the people who are currently living there. And when you add more layers of infrastructure in those costs, that's going to impact them. So we're trying to look at the bigger picture of you don't want a town of affordable housing and then million dollar homes. You want to preserve all the ones in between, otherwise those people are going to end up needing affordable housing. So you're creating another problem there. So I hope one of the board members went, mmm, it's like your first time he heard it presented in that way. And I I think it's very important. I've always kept my eye on all the different levels of housing opportunities. Um, and I think that's important for Croton Falls. And uh the other one, which I never thought of doing as part of this plan because the area is so small and the development potential is not gonna be increased that much with the sewer, you know, is already a fair number of apartments. There can be a couple more apartments above stores, um, and there are a few accessory apartments, but they said you don't have a build-out. You know, how many new um homes are you projecting with this plan? And um I said, no, we didn't do it. And I said, you know, it's it's a good point. I'll talk to the board about it. Um I said normally you would do something like that when you do a whole comprehensive plan for a town, and I said that's something the town board is thinking about its time. It's 2011, it's now 2025. It's time to consider that. But um, I don't know if the town board even wants us to even bother to do that, but that's something that's a question I think that the town board needs to answer, whether we

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com