OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Salem, New York/Town Board & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Salem Board of Appeals Hearing - February 12, 2026

Town Board & Boards — Thursday, February 12, 2026
BodyNorth Salem, New York
SessionTown Board & Boards
DateThursday, February 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 29:37

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Abrams on on Mills Road.

Unassigned speaker

0:05

If

Speaker 1

0:05

you're on Zoom rate, raise a hand, then I'll

Speaker 2

0:07

struggling to hear anything.

0:08

Yeah, I told them.

0:10

Yeah,

Unassigned speaker

0:10

but

Speaker 1

0:12

who's here for Abrams?

0:13

If you can call it in here.

Speaker 2

0:18

I I heard Abrams, and we're here representing Abrams, uh, but I haven't heard anything past that.

0:23

It seems like when you get close to the mic, it seems to be distorted, perhaps.

Speaker 1

0:26

All right, how's that?

0:27

Can you hear me

Unassigned speaker

0:28

now?

Speaker 2

0:30

Much better.

0:31

Much better.

Speaker 1

0:32

Okay.

0:32

All right.

0:33

So uh just go ahead and give us your quick synopsis.

0:36

It's a very straightforward application.

0:38

Uh I've been to the property on several occasions, so uh we'll just have a few questions after you um tell us about your application.

0:56

Could you hear any of that?

Speaker 3

1:04

It broke up a little bit, but yes, uh we we could hear that.

1:07

Um Nick, would you like me to speak here?

1:10

Yeah, go ahead.

1:13

Uh we believe that uh just with um these piers in the gate, um that it meets the aesthetic of the uh the neighborhood.

1:26

Um we think given the size of the property that uh it's a great entryway um that leads to uh their state.

1:32

Um they are set back at 72 feet, so uh really there's no sort of um hindrance to the road uh by any means.

1:44

Um and uh just what the client want and what we designed.

1:50

Um I feel met the uh like I said, the aesthetics of the property.

1:56

Um the height uh of the required height, but um I feel like it's very fitting.

2:06

Um as far as um you know uh uh what we're asking for is we're asking for this variance because I mean I I feel like uh just given that it's so push back from the road,

Unassigned speaker

2:21

it

Speaker 3

2:22

really

Unassigned speaker

2:23

it

Speaker 3

2:23

doesn't hinder the public by any means.

2:26

Um and uh like I stated before, it's pretty fitting

Unassigned speaker

2:30

to

Speaker 3

2:31

the care the property.

Speaker 1

2:33

Okay, thank you.

2:34

Um as I said, I I was uh at the property uh even three weeks ago.

2:40

Um and I think it's as you say it's set back, uh aesthetically pleasing, fits the character of the neighborhood.

2:49

Um you need the variance because for that size gate for a driveway that width uh be difficult to get it done properly with the four foot piercing.

3:01

So um uh only question I have is uh are there any plans?

3:05

I didn't know if there if it was lit at all.

3:08

Is there a plan for lights on top of the pier?

Speaker 2

3:13

No, uh no lights.

3:15

The club has opted to place a few solar powered lights up the driveway, uh, but but the piers nor the driveway at that portion.

Speaker 1

3:26

Okay.

3:26

Um any questions from members of the board.

Unassigned speaker

3:30

No,

Speaker 4

3:31

I think the piers look great set back, they're set so far back, but there is um one thing I did notice that the uh posts that hold up the deer fence that go around, you know, that that go from there are really uneven.

3:46

And I thought, well, this is just because they have the new part going, but it looks like the old part was the same way, so they might want to just level those off just for the aesthetic of

Unassigned speaker

3:54

it.

Unassigned speaker

3:55

They're

Speaker 4

3:55

all

Speaker 2

3:55

different.

3:56

I I completely agree.

3:58

That was the one section that we did not construct if it matters.

4:01

Uh that that was brought to Cynthia's attention as well.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████99%
Procedural█1%
Summary of Proceedings

North Salem Board of Appeals Hearing - February 12, 2026

The Town of North Salem Board of Appeals met on February 12, 2026, at 7:00 PM in person and via Zoom. The board set the next meeting for March 12, 2026; it heard four area variance applications and held one application to the March meeting. The transcript opens mid-meeting. No meeting minutes were available, and the agenda listed acceptance of the October 9, 2025, November 13, 2025, and December 11, 2025 minutes.

Consent Calendar

  • According to the agenda, minutes from October 9, 2025, November 13, 2025, and December 11, 2025 were listed for acceptance; the transcript does not capture that item.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public offered comments during the public hearings; each hearing was closed after the board confirmed no public comments.
  • For BA26-04, applicant representative Kellyn Cantrell reported that neighbor Mr. Schwartz had raised objections but, after discussing the proposal, was satisfied that the retaining wall would be at grade on his side. Mr. Schwartz's letter was placed in the record.

Discussion Items

BA26-01 - Cynthia Vance-Abrams, 235 Mills Road (listed on the agenda as a held-over hearing)

  • Request: Area variance for a gate with 6 ft.-3 in. stone pillars within the required front yard, a pillar-height variance of 2 ft.-3 in. where 4 ft. is allowed and 6 ft.-3 in. is proposed.
  • The applicant's representative said the gate is set back 72 ft. from the road, fits the property and neighborhood aesthetics, and would not hinder the public. The board confirmed no pillar lights are proposed; solar lights will be placed up the driveway. A board member noted uneven deer-fence posts; the representative said that section was not constructed by them and had been brought to the owner's attention. The speaker box is about 54-55 ft. from the road, so vehicles can pull off the road to use it.
  • Board action: Approved unanimously.

BA26-02 - Peter Vincent, 11 Locust Road

  • Request: Area variance to expand the first floor off the southeast corner of the house on approximately 0.16 acres in an R-1 district. Variances sought: front yard setback of 8 ft. where 30 ft. is required (28 ft. existing; 22 ft. proposed); building coverage of 13.4% where 10% is permitted (21.4% existing; 23.4% proposed); and development coverage of 3.3% where 25% is permitted (26% existing; 28.3% proposed).
  • Representative Richard Vale described a small porch addition and a mud-room extension pulled forward about 8-9 ft., with a new central foyer. The board reviewed a letter from the Vale's Grove cooperative and observed that the work does not go closer to neighbors, does not reduce off-street parking, and blends architecturally. The applicant agreed to full-cutoff outdoor lighting.
  • Board action: Approved unanimously.

BA26-03 - William Dall, 25 Bonnieview Street

  • Note: The agenda lists the applicant as William Dall; the transcript refers to William Dahl.
  • Request: Area variance to construct new decks within required side yards on approximately 0.26 acres in an R-1/2 district. Variances sought: combined side yard of 11 ft./30 ft. where 15 ft./40 ft. is required (4 ft./16.5 ft. existing; 4 ft./10 ft. proposed); building coverage of 7.7% where 10% is permitted (12.3% existing; 17.7% proposed); and development coverage of 4.3% where 25% is permitted (24.3% existing; 29.3% proposed).
  • Representative Richard Vale said the house has existing decks on the west and south sides but no lake-facing deck; the proposal connects decks around the house, replaces railings with cable rail, and follows dark-sky lighting. The new lake-facing deck is about 10 ft. deep with connector/catwalk sections.
  • Board action: Approved unanimously.

BA26-04 - Jerry Simon, 31 Whittier Hills Drive

  • Request: Area variance to decrease the rear yard setback on approximately 3.5 acres in an R-1 district to construct a wall on the rear yard side of a proposed Gunite in-ground pool. Variance sought: 33 ft. where 50 ft. is required; 89.7 ft. existing; 17 ft. proposed.
  • Representative Kellyn Cantrell said the home, completed in 2003, sits far to the rear; the front yard contains septic and tank, and a well and steep slopes restrict placement. The retaining wall will be at grade on the rear neighbor's side and about 4.5 ft. high on the applicant's side at its peak. The proposal includes a code-compliant pool barrier/fence, a small patio, three drywells for excess impervious surface, and a trench drain. No lighting is proposed except the pool light. The closest neighboring house is about 175 ft. away; the rear neighbor (Mr. Schwartz) is roughly 2,000 ft. away on a hillside. No trees will be removed.
  • Board action: Approved unanimously.

BA26-05 - Barbara Gatfield, 685 Titicus Road

  • Request: Area variance to install a gate in the required front yard in an R-4 district, a gate and pillar height variance of 2 ft. where 4 ft. is allowed and 6 ft. is proposed.
  • Held over: Board staff reported the public hearing notice was not published in the newspaper due to a publication error. The applicant was notified and agreed to wait for the March meeting; the notice will be republished. No decision was made.

Key Outcomes

  • The board unanimously approved BA26-01, BA26-02, BA26-03, and BA26-04.
  • BA26-05 was held over to March 12, 2026 because the public hearing notice was not published.
  • The board set its next meeting for March 12, 2026 and adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Abrams on on Mills Road. If you're on Zoom rate, raise a hand, then I'll struggling to hear anything. Yeah, I told them. Yeah, but who's here for Abrams? If you can call it in here. I I heard Abrams, and we're here representing Abrams, uh, but I haven't heard anything past that. It seems like when you get close to the mic, it seems to be distorted, perhaps. All right, how's that? Can you hear me now? Much better. Much better. Okay. All right. So uh just go ahead and give us your quick synopsis. It's a very straightforward application. Uh I've been to the property on several occasions, so uh we'll just have a few questions after you um tell us about your application. Could you hear any of that? It broke up a little bit, but yes, uh we we could hear that. Um Nick, would you like me to speak here? Yeah, go ahead. Uh we believe that uh just with um these piers in the gate, um that it meets the aesthetic of the uh the neighborhood. Um we think given the size of the property that uh it's a great entryway um that leads to uh their state. Um they are set back at 72 feet, so uh really there's no sort of um hindrance to the road uh by any means. Um and uh just what the client want and what we designed. Um I feel met the uh like I said, the aesthetics of the property. Um the height uh of the required height, but um I feel like it's very fitting. Um as far as um you know uh uh what we're asking for is we're asking for this variance because I mean I I feel like uh just given that it's so push back from the road, it really it doesn't hinder the public by any means. Um and uh like I stated before, it's pretty fitting to the care the property. Okay, thank you. Um as I said, I I was uh at the property uh even three weeks ago. Um and I think it's as you say it's set back, uh aesthetically pleasing, fits the character of the neighborhood. Um you need the variance because for that size gate for a driveway that width uh be difficult to get it done properly with the four foot piercing. So um uh only question I have is uh are there any plans? I didn't know if there if it was lit at all. Is there a plan for lights on top of the pier? No, uh no lights. The club has opted to place a few solar powered lights up the driveway, uh, but but the piers nor the driveway at that portion. Okay. Um any questions from members of the board.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com