Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Town of North Salem Planning Board met on April 15, 2026, at 7:00 PM in a hybrid in-person and Zoom meeting. The board discussed three agenda items: a pre-application for the North Salem Open Land Foundation regarding office use in a residential zone, a regular application for property changes at 2 Brookside Ln. involving wetlands and conservation easement compliance, and a work session to refine the proposed tree ordinance with the Conservation Advisory Council (CAC). Key outcomes included directions to draft a zoning recommendation for conservation-related office uses, conditional approval of a revised landscape plan for the Brookside property pending consultant review, and a directive to restructure the tree ordinance into a two-tier permit system.
1. Pre-Application: North Salem Open Land Foundation (3 Willow Ln.)
2. Regular Meeting: Bossi Property (2 Brookside Ln.) – Proposed Changes
3. Work Session: Continuation of Tree Ordinance Discussion with CAC
No, I'm kidding. And my daughter were no soon enough. Yeah, and here comes Will. All right. As Will is uh coming on, we have um the first item on our agenda is gonna be the North Salem Open Land Foundation. Um John. Um couple weeks ago we gave an overview, and we had Chris Brockmeyer here who had a recuse himself, and uh we did not have Ed. So tonight we have Ed, so we're gonna be a little repetitive, but I think it's worth it. Um Ed did have the advantage of reading um the minutes, so he's uh do you have any specific questions you want to start with? Um I did have one question. Should we could you explain eclipse? Eclipse that was used in the minutes. Oh that's something that eclipsed in wait, I could pull that up. Oh that that was what I was talking to about then finalizing that. Oh, okay. It's just a part of the discussion. It sounded like that was before. Do you know who's who spoke it? Uh Emily. Oh that I could well something that sounds like eclipse. It did sound like eclipse. All right, well, we're not gonna worry about it because there's no special eclipses going on on the wild property that the rest of us aren't aware of. Um so the predicament is that we have a use uh in an R4 district, um, and we should think about whether or not we would recommend to the town board to permit it in some capacity, either as an accessory to what's an existing special permit use for recre um passive recreation um activities, or if we do it as a standalone. Um Will, since you suggested that Ed Um raised a question, which I think is a very good one. If we wrote it as a standalone for one type of nonprofit, uh are we gonna get in trouble because we're not writing it as a standalone? That is uh office use for any of the other non-for-profits in town, bridal trails, GBH, historical, any of those. No, I I think we would write it as a nonprofit or a conservation-oriented organization. And you think it's okay to just isolate that one type of use as a standalone? Yeah, as opposed to the other being more of a uh recreational use is more encompassing, but it's it's mostly it is a lot mostly recreational. And it's more likely well, I know the historical Saudi owns property, but I don't think the other groups, nonprofits do, right including lions and bridles. So land trusts do, right? Oh, yes, definitely land trusts. Yes, so any kind of land trust, it could be a standalone. Umce Chris re is recusing himself, it's really gonna be up for the moment it's gonna be up to the three of us to uh decide what direction we want to go in. Um and sometimes what helps us think think through the process is to have an initial draft of