OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Salem, New York/Town Board & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Town of North Salem Planning Board Meeting - April 15, 2026

Town Board & Boards — Wednesday, April 15, 2026
BodyNorth Salem, New York
SessionTown Board & Boards
DateWednesday, April 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 45:47

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

No,

Speaker 2

0:00

I'm

Speaker 1

0:00

kidding.

0:02

And my daughter were no

Speaker 2

0:03

soon enough.

Speaker 1

0:07

Yeah, and here comes Will.

0:11

All right.

0:12

As Will is uh coming on, we have um the first item on our agenda

Unassigned speaker

0:18

is

Speaker 1

0:18

gonna be the North Salem Open Land Foundation.

0:22

Um John.

0:24

Um couple weeks ago we gave an overview, and we had Chris Brockmeyer here who had a recuse himself, and uh we did not have Ed.

0:35

So tonight we have Ed, so we're gonna be a little repetitive, but I think it's worth it.

0:40

Um Ed did have the advantage of reading um the minutes, so he's uh do you have any specific questions you want to start with?

Speaker 3

0:49

Um I did have one question.

0:50

Should we could you explain eclipse?

0:53

Eclipse that was used in the minutes.

0:56

Oh that's something that eclipsed in wait, I could pull that

Unassigned speaker

1:01

up.

Unassigned speaker

1:02

Oh that that was what I was talking to about then finalizing that.

Speaker 3

1:08

Oh, okay.

Unassigned speaker

1:09

It's just a part of the discussion.

Unassigned speaker

1:12

It sounded like that was before.

Speaker 1

1:14

Do you know who's who spoke it?

Speaker 3

1:15

Uh Emily.

1:16

Oh that I could well

Speaker 1

1:18

something that sounds like eclipse.

Speaker 3

1:20

It did sound like eclipse.

1:22

All

Speaker 1

1:23

right, well, we're not gonna worry about it because there's no special eclipses going on on the wild property that the rest of us aren't aware

Unassigned speaker

1:32

of.

Speaker 1

1:33

Um so the predicament is that we have a use uh in an R4 district, um, and we should think about whether or not we would recommend to the town board to permit

Unassigned speaker

1:46

it

Speaker 1

1:46

in some capacity, either as an accessory to what's an existing special permit use for recre um passive recreation um activities, or if we do it as a standalone.

2:08

Um Will, since you suggested that Ed Um raised a question, which I think is a very good one.

2:15

If we wrote it as a standalone for one type of nonprofit,

Unassigned speaker

2:20

uh

Speaker 1

2:20

are we gonna get in trouble because we're not writing it as a standalone?

2:23

That is uh office use for any of the other non-for-profits in town, bridal trails, GBH, historical, any of those.

2:32

No, I

Speaker 4

2:33

I think we would write it as a nonprofit or a conservation-oriented organization.

Speaker 1

2:38

And you think it's okay to just isolate that one type of use as a standalone?

Speaker 4

2:46

Yeah, as opposed to the other being more of a uh recreational use is more encompassing, but it's it's mostly it is a lot mostly recreational.

Speaker 1

2:59

And it's more likely well, I know the historical Saudi owns property, but I don't think the other groups, nonprofits do, right including lions and bridles.

3:10

So

Speaker 4

3:11

land trusts do, right?

Speaker 1

3:12

Oh, yes, definitely land trusts.

3:14

Yes, so any kind of land trust, it could be a standalone.

3:19

Umce Chris re is recusing himself, it's really gonna be up for the moment it's gonna be up to the three of us to uh decide what direction we want to go in.

3:32

Um and sometimes what helps us think think through the process is to have an initial draft of

Unassigned speaker

3:40

it.

Speaker 1

3:41

Um and then we can better see, you know, what are the parameters?

3:45

Is it really gonna work and in any R4 or R2 wherever this use is uh I assume we would follow the same places where the use is allowed, Will, or because office is

Speaker 2

3:59

more

Speaker 1

4:00

inclined for you know NB districts and PO districts, but if you jump over the other residential zones to R4, how do we justify

Unassigned speaker

4:10

that?

Speaker 1

4:10

Because they're larger pieces of land, we can make acreage a uh factor, 10 acres or more or something like

Unassigned speaker

4:19

that.

Speaker 4

4:20

Yeah, I mean the recreational is I don't know, 10 to 50 acres or something.

4:25

Right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████37%
Building Code Compliance█████████████████████21%
Environmental Protection███████████████████19%
Parks and Recreation█████████████13%
Public Engagement█████5%
Procedural█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Town of North Salem Planning Board Meeting - April 15, 2026

The Town of North Salem Planning Board met on April 15, 2026, at 7:00 PM in a hybrid in-person and Zoom meeting. The board discussed three agenda items: a pre-application for the North Salem Open Land Foundation regarding office use in a residential zone, a regular application for property changes at 2 Brookside Ln. involving wetlands and conservation easement compliance, and a work session to refine the proposed tree ordinance with the Conservation Advisory Council (CAC). Key outcomes included directions to draft a zoning recommendation for conservation-related office uses, conditional approval of a revised landscape plan for the Brookside property pending consultant review, and a directive to restructure the tree ordinance into a two-tier permit system.

Discussion Items

1. Pre-Application: North Salem Open Land Foundation (3 Willow Ln.)

  • The board discussed whether to recommend to the Town Board permitting office use as an accessory to passive recreation or as a standalone use for conservation-oriented nonprofit organizations in the R4 zoning district. Members expressed support for limiting such use to land trusts or conservation organizations and requiring the use to be on land owned by the organization. The board decided to have the applicant's planner (Will) draft a proposed zoning amendment, with potential research into similar ordinances in other towns. The applicant agreed to fund the drafting through an escrow account.

2. Regular Meeting: Bossi Property (2 Brookside Ln.) – Proposed Changes

  • Applicant representative Alan Singer presented revised plans for a property subject to a conservation easement with the town and wetland regulations. The board noted that the conservation easement prohibits any path or trail other than an approved four-foot pedestrian trail. The applicant agreed to remove all references to a defined trail and replace it with “no mow grass” that may be walked on without formal maintenance. The board also noted that the revised planting plan includes 65 trees and 176 shrubs (equivalent to 22 additional trees) for a total replacement of 71 removed stumps. The board directed the applicant to update the plans to remove trail references and then submit to the town’s wetlands inspector and CAC for review before a final decision.

3. Work Session: Continuation of Tree Ordinance Discussion with CAC

  • Rob West from the CAC presented a draft revision to the town’s tree ordinance. The board discussed structuring the ordinance similarly to the freshwater wetlands code: an administrative permit for removal of up to 10 trees (issued by the building inspector) and larger or more sensitive removals requiring planning board approval. Members emphasized requiring a certified arborist report for dead/diseased tree removal, giving the building inspector discretion to refer borderline cases to the planning board, and considering erosion control and buffer impacts. The board asked the town planner (Will) to reorganize the draft to reflect these tiers and bring back a revised version.

Key Outcomes

  • North Salem Open Land Foundation: The board directed staff to draft a zoning recommendation allowing office use for conservation organizations on land they own in R4 districts, with the applicant covering drafting costs via escrow. A draft is expected at a future meeting.
  • Bossi Property: The applicant will revise plans to remove all trail references and resubmit. The board will refer the updated plan to the wetlands inspector and CAC for review. A decision is anticipated at the May 6 regular meeting or later.
  • Tree Ordinance: The board tasked the planner with reorganizing the ordinance into a two-tier permit system (administrative for ≤10 trees, planning board for larger removals) and incorporating safeguards such as arborist reports and building inspector discretion. A revised draft will be presented at a future work session.
  • Next Meetings: Regular meeting on May 6, 2026; work session on May 20, 2026 (chair not available, so Vice Chair Chris Brockmeyer may preside if quorum is present).

Meeting Transcript

No, I'm kidding. And my daughter were no soon enough. Yeah, and here comes Will. All right. As Will is uh coming on, we have um the first item on our agenda is gonna be the North Salem Open Land Foundation. Um John. Um couple weeks ago we gave an overview, and we had Chris Brockmeyer here who had a recuse himself, and uh we did not have Ed. So tonight we have Ed, so we're gonna be a little repetitive, but I think it's worth it. Um Ed did have the advantage of reading um the minutes, so he's uh do you have any specific questions you want to start with? Um I did have one question. Should we could you explain eclipse? Eclipse that was used in the minutes. Oh that's something that eclipsed in wait, I could pull that up. Oh that that was what I was talking to about then finalizing that. Oh, okay. It's just a part of the discussion. It sounded like that was before. Do you know who's who spoke it? Uh Emily. Oh that I could well something that sounds like eclipse. It did sound like eclipse. All right, well, we're not gonna worry about it because there's no special eclipses going on on the wild property that the rest of us aren't aware of. Um so the predicament is that we have a use uh in an R4 district, um, and we should think about whether or not we would recommend to the town board to permit it in some capacity, either as an accessory to what's an existing special permit use for recre um passive recreation um activities, or if we do it as a standalone. Um Will, since you suggested that Ed Um raised a question, which I think is a very good one. If we wrote it as a standalone for one type of nonprofit, uh are we gonna get in trouble because we're not writing it as a standalone? That is uh office use for any of the other non-for-profits in town, bridal trails, GBH, historical, any of those. No, I I think we would write it as a nonprofit or a conservation-oriented organization. And you think it's okay to just isolate that one type of use as a standalone? Yeah, as opposed to the other being more of a uh recreational use is more encompassing, but it's it's mostly it is a lot mostly recreational. And it's more likely well, I know the historical Saudi owns property, but I don't think the other groups, nonprofits do, right including lions and bridles. So land trusts do, right? Oh, yes, definitely land trusts. Yes, so any kind of land trust, it could be a standalone. Umce Chris re is recusing himself, it's really gonna be up for the moment it's gonna be up to the three of us to uh decide what direction we want to go in. Um and sometimes what helps us think think through the process is to have an initial draft of

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com