OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Ocean City Mayor and Council Work Session – May 26, 2026

Mayor and City Council & BoardsTuesday, May 26, 2026
BodyOcean City, Maryland
SessionMayor and City Council & Boards
DateTuesday, May 26, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:16

All right, good afternoon, everyone.

0:18

I apologize for the delay.

0:19

We're getting started a little late here today.

0:21

Closed session ran long.

0:24

Welcome to this work session of the mayor and city council.

0:27

Today's Tuesday, May 26, 2026.

0:30

Like I said, just after 1 p.m.

0:32

First, on the agenda, I have our notice and report on our closed session.

0:36

Prior to the mayor and city council's open session being held at 1 p.m.

0:40

on May 26, 2026.

0:42

A closed session was held today beginning at 10 30 a.m.

0:46

here at City Hall.

0:49

The following is a report of the closed session.

0:56

Not what it normally says.

1:15

Topics of discussion were legal, real estate, and public security matters.

1:20

Persons present were Mayor Rick Meehan, City Manager Terry McGean, Deputy City Manager J.R.

1:24

Harmon, Council President Matt James, Council Secretary Will Savage, Council Members John Garrick, Jake Metrisick, Peter Buis, and Jeff Heiser.

1:33

City Clerk Diana Chavis, City Solicitor Heather Stansbury.

1:37

We're also joined by Mark Cropper from her office, police chief Ray Austin, and police captain Dennis Eid, Deputy Communications Manager, Ashley Miller, Ocean City Fire Department, Community Engagement Officer, and the Public Information Officer Ryan Whittington, Government Relations Manager Lauren Davis, Public Works Director Hal Atkins, and our tourism and business development director, Tom Perlazzo.

2:02

I had a motion from Secretary Savage, seconded by Councilmember Heiser to close the closed session.

2:08

That passed with five in favor at 123 p.m.

2:12

With Councilmember Bus out of the room and Councilmember Proctor absent.

2:16

And for the record, Councilmember Proctor will be absent for the entire meeting today.

2:23

Moving on, we have comments from the public.

2:26

Any person who may wish to speak on a matter scheduled for discussion on the work session agenda may be heard during comments from the public for a period of three minutes or such time as may be deemed appropriate by the council president.

2:36

Anyone wishing to be heard shall state their name, their address, and the agenda item on which he or she wishes to speak.

2:42

Would anyone like to speak today?

2:44

Sir.

4:10

Actual physical occupancy with an ocean city for the majority of the calendar year.

4:22

Number three, I have is the continue a residency requirement.

4:26

I believe we have two years right now.

4:29

I don't know if it's one year or two years.

4:31

I do think it's one year.

4:32

I looked around and Berlin has one year to be in the Maryland General Assembly, it's one year to be the Baltimore City Mayor.

4:40

It's one year.

5:00

Um clarifying the treatment of outside property owners, obviously, making sure that the ownership outside of Ocean City does not disqualify anyone, but it's just used as their second home, and again, making sure they're not getting any benefits with that property.

5:12

Uh five, very big one, making sure that the prohibitive rental and claimed primary residence cannot be lease rented or otherwise given exclusive occupancy for that residence.

5:23

I would like to clarify year-round residency expectations.

5:26

The intent of service should be that residency within the community is during all seasons, not periodic or part-time.

5:33

Um I appreciate those that want a snowbird, but that's not what the intent of this charter is.

5:37

It's that you're here for all the seasons for the residents and the businesses throughout the year.

5:43

Um is very important to me as well.

5:46

I think that we need to either one move to the board of Worcester County elected election committee to verify the candidates, or at the very least, the council members that are up for the next cycle for the election, they should be put on an abstention of voting because it's very hard in transparency and optics for someone to vote on someone's ability to run when you may be their opposition in the next cycle of the election process.

6:19

Also, um, given the importance of effectiveness and effective dates for this, I do think that this should be for the November 3rd cycle.

6:27

I do not feel that anyone that is a council member now should be put to the the you know litmus test of what what you decide today.

6:36

It should be started new, and as one half of the people that have actually filed for the November 3rd election cycle, I do believe that we should have to refile and make sure that we're under the same scrutiny of everyone else running.

6:51

And then is all I have for today.

6:53

Thank you very much.

6:55

Anyone else today?

7:06

Hi, good afternoon.

7:07

Leslie Smith 107 Convention Center Drive.

7:11

Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.

7:12

I would like to speak regarding the residency requirements being discussed today for council and mayor positions.

7:20

As we revisit this topic and continue discussions stemming from former council member DeLuca's residency situation, I would like to propose that the current requirement prohibiting someone from holding a rental license for the two-year prior to an election be eliminated.

7:37

I do not believe that requirement is necessary.

7:40

Instead, I would recommend keeping the language that prohibits an elected official from possessing a rental license while serving on council or as mayor.

7:50

The current proposal asks someone to give up something of value with no guarantee they will ultimately be elected.

7:56

Even though they may lawfully reside within the town and otherwise meet residency requirements, I believe that creates an unnecessary burden on prospective candidates.

8:05

Residency and Domicile can already be determined through numerous existing factors such as your tax records, voter registration, driver's license, mailing information, utility bills, etc.

8:18

Additionally, the fact that someone may not spend every weekend or every moment at their domicile does not automatically mean they do not live there.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████33%
Elected Official Residency█████████████████████21%
Election Procedures███████████████15%
Parks and Recreation█████████9%
Community Engagement███████7%
Public Safety███3%
Transportation Safety██2%
Parking Management██2%
Engineering and Infrastructure██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Ocean City Mayor and Council Work Session – May 26, 2026

The Mayor and City Council held a work session on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, starting shortly after 1:00 PM, following a closed session that ran from 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM (legal, real estate, and public security matters). The meeting included public comments, consent agenda items, updates on the 5th Street Post Office demolition and downtown parking, approval of the Racquet Center redevelopment design, and a lengthy discussion on elected official residency requirements and potential charter amendments.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: The council approved the work session minutes of May 12, 2026, and regular session #9 minutes of May 18, 2026. Motion carried with six in favor.
  • Standing Committee Reports Acknowledged: Police Commission (May 18) and Recreation and Parks Committee (May 14) reports were noted without discussion.
  • Pension Committee Recommendation Approved: The council approved the recommendation to change the international manager and reallocate funds. Motion carried with six in favor. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee report was tabled at council's request.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Unidentified Speaker (male): Spoke in favor of several charter changes: clarifying year-round residency requirements (actual physical occupancy for majority of calendar year), reducing the residency requirement from two years to one (citing Berlin, Salisbury, and Maryland General Assembly as examples), ensuring that outside property ownership does not disqualify candidates, prohibiting the rental or exclusive occupancy of a claimed primary residence, and shifting the judging of candidate qualifications to the Worcester County Board of Elections or requiring abstention of council members up for election. He urged that any new rules apply to the November 2026 election cycle and that current council members should not be grandfathered.
  • Leslie Smith (107 Convention Center Drive): Proposed eliminating the requirement that candidates surrender their rental license two years prior to election, arguing that residency can be determined by other factors (tax records, voter registration, driver’s license, etc.). She recommended requiring surrender of the rental license only upon assumption of office, and that the charter should continue to allow challenges to an elected official’s continuing residency.
  • Vince Gisriel (1408 Sailing Road, Ocean City): Favored the Board of Supervisors of Elections as the deciding body on candidate qualifications, noted that the current two-year requirement is too long (other towns have one year), and opposed the short-term rental license provision as an unnecessary add-on. He noted existing appeal provisions in the charter (Section C-505) as safeguards.

Discussion Items

  • Update on 5th Street Post Office Demolition and Parking (Hal Adkins, Public Works Director): Demolition of the post office building is expected to be complete by Friday, May 29, 2026. Public Works will begin site preparation on Tuesday, June 2 (grading, stabilization with asphalt millings/crushed concrete, temporary lighting). The lot is targeted to open for paid parking by June 11, ahead of the air show. Adkins also noted historical discoveries (an old parking garage slab from the 1930s) and provided broader context on downtown public parking: a 2006 study showed a deficiency of nearly 500 spaces; since then, the city added 63 spaces at the former Whiteside lot and gained about 30 spaces at the Worcester Street lot, but lost 31 spaces at Somerset Street/Baltimore Avenue when the police substation was built. Major events like the C3 music festival temporarily take about 1,700 parking spaces out of public use.
  • Racquet Center Redevelopment Design Update (Hal Adkins, Kate Gaddis – Recreation & Parks Director, Taylor Hershey – Engineering Project Manager): The project is moving to 100% design development and bidding in July 2026, with construction anticipated to go to the bond market in November/December 2026. The proposed site plan includes new pickleball courts, resurfaced tennis courts (clay courts in good condition), and a new 2,600 sq ft building (double the current 1,500 sq ft) that unifies the coastal highway and racquet center sides. The building will feature retail space, an office, a multi-purpose room for camps/socials, bathrooms accessible without entering the main building, and storage. The design mirrors the architectural theme of the Ocean Bowl building. Council discussed adding shade structures on the deck and potential fencing/gating. The Recreation and Parks Committee had previously recommended moving forward. The council voted unanimously (5-0, with Councilmember Metrisick and Proctor absent) to proceed to 100% design development and authorize bidding.
  • Further Discussion of Elected Official Residency Requirements and Charter Changes (City Solicitor Heather Stansbury): Stansbury reviewed the history of charter amendments since July 2025, including the change from four months to two years residency and the rental license provision. She presented three topics from the February 2026 special meeting: (1) who should judge candidate qualifications, (2) whether additional qualifications should be added, and (3) whether changes should apply to current council members. Council feedback included:
    • Judge of Qualifications: Consensus to keep the council as the judge (rather than the Board of Supervisors of Elections), but to allow approval of candidates on a rolling basis as they file, not only at the October meeting, to give candidates earlier certainty.
    • Additional Qualifications: Stansbury offered four options: (A) a brief, clear rule; (B) a rebuttable presumption; (C) a legislative intent statement; (D) do nothing. Council rejected options A and B (too specific or burdensome). There was interest in option C (legislative intent statement) – language clarifying that candidates must maintain Ocean City as their true, fixed, primary residence and that mere technical compliance with domicile is insufficient. Councilmember Heiser suggested adopting the legislative intent but also removing the current charter subsection C (the rental license prohibition). However, other council members noted that changing the rental license provision would unwind the July 2025 changes and that the current council might not have a full complement to make such a change. Ultimately, no consensus was reached on altering the rental license or two-year requirements.
    • Application to Current Council: Stansbury advised that if charter changes are made, they would apply to current council members immediately. Some council members (e.g., Councilmember Buis) expressed concern about changing rules for an individual case and suggested waiting for a full council.
  • Vote on Charter Direction: Council agreed to have the City Solicitor draft a charter amendment resolution incorporating the items on which there was consensus (keep council as judge, allow rolling candidate approval, possibly a legislative intent statement). The draft will be brought back to the next work session with a full council present (Councilmember Proctor was absent, and Councilmember Metrisick had left). No vote was taken on any charter changes.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved Racquet Center Redevelopment Design: Motion passed 5-0 to proceed to 100% design and authorize bidding.
  • Consent Agenda Approved: Minutes, committee reports (police, recreation), and pension committee recommendation approved.
  • 5th Street Parking Lot on Track: Demolition finishing May 29; site prep starting June 2; lot to open for paid parking by June 11.
  • Residency Requirements – Direction Given: Council affirmed staying as the judge of qualifications, will explore earlier candidate approval, and may add a legislative intent statement. Rental license and two-year requirements were discussed but no change was directed; a draft charter amendment will be prepared for the next full-council work session.
  • Closed Session Notice: Reported as held from 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM on legal, real estate, and public security matters with the specified officials present.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good afternoon, everyone. I apologize for the delay. We're getting started a little late here today. Closed session ran long. Welcome to this work session of the mayor and city council. Today's Tuesday, May 26, 2026. Like I said, just after 1 p.m. First, on the agenda, I have our notice and report on our closed session. Prior to the mayor and city council's open session being held at 1 p.m. on May 26, 2026. A closed session was held today beginning at 10 30 a.m. here at City Hall. The following is a report of the closed session. Not what it normally says. Topics of discussion were legal, real estate, and public security matters. Persons present were Mayor Rick Meehan, City Manager Terry McGean, Deputy City Manager J.R. Harmon, Council President Matt James, Council Secretary Will Savage, Council Members John Garrick, Jake Metrisick, Peter Buis, and Jeff Heiser. City Clerk Diana Chavis, City Solicitor Heather Stansbury. We're also joined by Mark Cropper from her office, police chief Ray Austin, and police captain Dennis Eid, Deputy Communications Manager, Ashley Miller, Ocean City Fire Department, Community Engagement Officer, and the Public Information Officer Ryan Whittington, Government Relations Manager Lauren Davis, Public Works Director Hal Atkins, and our tourism and business development director, Tom Perlazzo. I had a motion from Secretary Savage, seconded by Councilmember Heiser to close the closed session. That passed with five in favor at 123 p.m. With Councilmember Bus out of the room and Councilmember Proctor absent. And for the record, Councilmember Proctor will be absent for the entire meeting today. Moving on, we have comments from the public. Any person who may wish to speak on a matter scheduled for discussion on the work session agenda may be heard during comments from the public for a period of three minutes or such time as may be deemed appropriate by the council president. Anyone wishing to be heard shall state their name, their address, and the agenda item on which he or she wishes to speak. Would anyone like to speak today? Sir. Actual physical occupancy with an ocean city for the majority of the calendar year. Number three, I have is the continue a residency requirement. I believe we have two years right now. I don't know if it's one year or two years. I do think it's one year. I looked around and Berlin has one year to be in the Maryland General Assembly, it's one year to be the Baltimore City Mayor. It's one year. Um clarifying the treatment of outside property owners, obviously, making sure that the ownership outside of Ocean City does not disqualify anyone, but it's just used as their second home, and again, making sure they're not getting any benefits with that property. Uh five, very big one, making sure that the prohibitive rental and claimed primary residence cannot be lease rented or otherwise given exclusive occupancy for that residence. I would like to clarify year-round residency expectations. The intent of service should be that residency within the community is during all seasons, not periodic or part-time. Um I appreciate those that want a snowbird, but that's not what the intent of this charter is. It's that you're here for all the seasons for the residents and the businesses throughout the year. Um is very important to me as well. I think that we need to either one move to the board of Worcester County elected election committee to verify the candidates, or at the very least, the council members that are up for the next cycle for the election, they should be put on an abstention of voting because it's very hard in transparency and optics for someone to vote on someone's ability to run when you may be their opposition in the next cycle of the election process. Also, um, given the importance of effectiveness and effective dates for this, I do think that this should be for the November 3rd cycle. I do not feel that anyone that is a council member now should be put to the the you know litmus test of what what you decide today. It should be started new, and as one half of the people that have actually filed for the November 3rd election cycle, I do believe that we should have to refile and make sure that we're under the same scrutiny of everyone else running. And then is all I have for today. Thank you very much. Anyone else today? Hi, good afternoon.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com