The Ocean City Board of Zoning Appeals met on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The meeting covered administrative approvals of prior meeting minutes and findings of fact, discussion of a proposed amendment to the Board’s rules of procedure, and two public hearings for special exception requests. All votes were unanimous unless noted.
I'd like to call to order tonight's Town of Ocean City Board of Zoning Appeals meeting for Thursday, May the 28th, 2026. We're going to start off with some administrative matters and then we're going to move into public hearings. Board members, this is all in your packets. The floor is open for discussion and emotion. And I did have one correction here just on item C under number one. It's missing the actual vote on that one. Thank you. I'll make that change. All right. Any further discussion? No. Right. And we'll entertain a motion. I'll motion to approve as amended. Okay, we have a motion to approve is amended. Second. And a second from Mr. Moran. Um all those in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed, seeing none, let the record show the uh admin or excuse me, the um the minutes from April 23rd are meeting are adopted. Uh next item, we've got the findings of fact for BZA 2737. This is Regan Smith Esquire for Nolan Graves. The floor is open for discussion and a motion. I have no substantive changes. I've reviewed and I didn't catch anything either. Any further comments? The only thing that I thought is under the conclusion on page 12 where it says this design will not create a substantial impact, if that should say a substantial negative impact. Yes. And I just want to make sure. There's no evidence. Not create a substantial negative pocket. Well, get rid of the not. No evidence that this design will create a substantial negative. Well, no, that's wrong too. No. Nope. I think just adding negative. Yeah. It is a double negative. Because they have to show that it won't have an adverse impact. Or we could, or it could say there is evidence that this design will create a substantial impact to adjacent properties. That's a different statement. Yeah. Well, I think the the issue is it being being a adverse or negative impact. So that's why I just felt we should have that. And there's no evidence before that, too, so there is a lot of uh double and triple negatives. With a negative, it parses out. There is no evidence of what?