6 o'clock.

All right, it is 6 o'clock.

I'm gonna go ahead and call tonight's planning and zoning commission meeting to order.

Today is Tuesday, August 18th, 2026.

Um we've already noted that we don't have enough of a quorum to approve the minutes, so we're gonna table those for our next meeting.

Uh so we'll move on to item two, minor site plan amendment request, uh, minor site plan amendment to create two phases for previously approved site plan known as Atlantic Edge, consisting of eight multifamily condominium units arranged across four duplex style buildings.

Subject property is described as lots 22 and 23, block 22, map 118, parcel 8845A of the Fenwork 4 Plat.

The properties known locally as 14142nd Street in the town of Ocean City, Maryland.

Applicant Atlantic Planning and Development for 142nd Street, development of Ocean City in the care of Jeff Thaler, principal PZ file number 25-181000 two.

Evening everyone.

So this is in the R3A Moderate Residential Zoning District.

Um the applicant proposes to split the previously approved projects into two phases, including units one, two, three, and four as phase one, and units five, six, seven, and eight as phase two, in order to proceed with the certificate of certificates of occupancy for phase one.

Um the entire project consisted of eight multifamily condominium dwelling units in the form of four duplex buildings, um, each containing two attached units.

These buildings are arranged as four units accessed by 142nd Street.

Each unit of these is three stories plus a habitable attic as a loft, totaling five bedrooms, four point five bathrooms at approximately twenty-seven square foot square feet per unit, and the other is four units access via rear alley through internal streets.

Um each unit is three stories containing three bedrooms, three and a half baths, and about eighteen fifty square feet per unit.

Um the TRC meeting was held in March of 2025.

Uh following staff feedback, the applicant reduced the project from 10 to 8 units.

Um there was a subsequent TRC meeting that was conducted in July 2025.

Um and the revised site plan dated July 25th addressed all of staff comments and concerns and any necessary updates.

Um the planning commission did issue an official approval that had 22 conditions on July 31st, 2025.

So just last year this was approved.

Um the conditions of approval include all original planning commission conditions of the approval from July of last year.

All site uh plan approvals are subject to building code, fire code, and all other applicable government regulations.

Um all work shall be completed as shown on the approved site plan and any revisions to the approved site plan needs to be in accordance with section 110-184.

And of course, site site plan approval shall expire 18 months after the date of approval unless a building permit for the uh project is obtained prior, therefore there too pursuant to uh section 11052 C2.

Um so I'm going to go over the exhibits and use the document camera now.

Staff exhibit one is the previous staff report dated July 31st, 2025.

And this is several pages that goes through all of the previous comments, all of the staff conditions of approval from last July.

All of the parking calculations.

Applicant exhibit one is the phasing request letter dated August 10th, 2026.

Exhibit number two are the phasing plans dated August 8th, 2026.

Exhibit number three is the phasing documentation letter from August 11th, 2026.

Exhibit number four is the construction phasing report dated August 2026.

Um there are several pages to this.

It is stapled, it goes through all of the construction documentation.

Exhibit number five is the final as constructed survey dated August 8th, 2026.

Here you will see phase one, which is already constructed, and the proposed phase two, which is pending construction.

And applicant exhibits six and seven are the elevation certifications for the four units in phase one.

These are all stapled and one section as well, including pictures.

Planning and community development staff recommends approval of the site plan as presented, subject to the conditions as I noted above.

Compliance with all applicable governmental regulations to ensure maximum code compliance and any additional requirements the planning commission may impose following their review.

Awesome, thank you.

Any questions for KP?

Or any questions for the applicant?

Seems pretty straightforward.

No.

Okay.

If not, I'll entertain a motion.

As presented.

Approved as presented.

Okay, motion to approve.

Tony second.

Any further discussion?

All those in favor?

All right.

Very good.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you very much.